MakeTNGrtAgain
Respected on Both Sides
- Joined
- May 11, 2017
- Messages
- 889
- Likes
- 731
You're wanting cities to have total control over the rest of the state and certain cities control over the whole country. Is that just?
Good thing there are many people that are working towards modernizing our voter system.
The electoral college provides a check and balance to urban and costal dumb@$$ery. Arguing against this means you probably reside or align yourself with the brilliant minds in these bankrupt, crime ridden regions.
Jackson, TN crime rate is 57% higher than the Tennessee average and is 95% higher than the national average.
Yep. That's why I live in NW Madison County, away from all the crap. Thank goodness the rural counties around here provide the aforementioned check and balance to all of the idiots that live in what is now called little Memphis.
The electoral college provides a check and balance to urban and costal dumb@$$ery. Arguing against this means you probably reside or align yourself with the brilliant minds in these bankrupt, crime ridden regions.
Yep. That's why I live in NW Madison County, away from all the crap. Thank goodness the rural counties around here provide the aforementioned check and balance to all of the idiots that live in what is now called little Memphis.
There are many more examples of small towns with bad crime nowhere near any city. You are wrong about the EC and crime. Most conservative only know talking points like you though.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/crime-rates-by-county/
False maps have been shared through social media since the election comparing county-level election results to crime maps, but The Washington Post Fact Checker and Snopes.com determined that the implied relationship between voting patterns and crime was fallacious.
The question remains, though, what does the U.S. crime rate look like across the country on a county-size scale?
Counties across the South, the Pacific Northwest, California, New Mexico and the lower Mississippi River area show the highest rates of crime adjusted for population in 2014.
You can make numbers show whatever you want the desired outcome to show. This map makes a peaceful place look violent by taking a sparsely populated area that has a couple of crimes and making it look violent. Try again.
You are aware crime rates account for population right? That is why it is per 1000 people in the study. The numbers speak for themselves. Anytime people point out how dangerous some rural areas are yall cry about the small population. So on the same hand if the crime rate is lower in a big city but way more crimes due to size, why don't you acknowledge the large number of crimes is only due to high population?
Maybe you should actually look objectively at things instead repeating incorrect conservative talking points.
You are aware crime rates account for population right? That is why it is per 1000 people in the study. The numbers speak for themselves. Anytime people point out how dangerous some rural areas are yall cry about the small population. So on the same hand if the crime rate is lower in a big city but way more crimes due to size, why don't you acknowledge the large number of crimes is only due to high population?
Maybe you should actually look objectively at things instead repeating incorrect conservative talking points.
and this is just "crime" in general. and even if a city has the same rate as Bum*****ville MS, the city would still be much more dangerous. if Bum*****ville's rate is 14 in 1000 with a population of 3000; a city with a 1 to 1000 rate with 100,000 people is still more dangerous. The city would have to have a proportionally smaller rate of crime to population to be "safer".