TrumPutinGate

Sure.

Partly because of being a wimp.

And because of McConnell's threats about taking the knowledge public.

so it wouldn't have been an issue if Hillary had won?

and what knowledge? seems like anything McConnell would have had Obama would have had better of. and not sure of how it could be damning except that Obama knew this terrible truth and did nothing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
so it wouldn't have been an issue if Hillary had won?

and what knowledge? seems like anything McConnell would have had Obama would have had better of. and not sure of how it could be damning except that Obama knew this terrible truth and did nothing.

I agree with an earlier suggestion that if there's Russian interference the Obama admin knew about and sat on, then it was in the hopes of handing it to the expected Clinton admin to give them a year's worth of investigations, inquiries, and headlines while trying to pass it off as republican collusion, and not just Trump. They hoped to use that as a smear going into 2018 and 2020.

Bit them in the butt if they do have info but sat on it.
 
Hypothetical Hollywood exec reading a screenplay of all of this a couple years back. Screenwriter is seated opposite his desk, listening:

"The president implicated in Russian espionage actually meets with the Russian leader with only his secretary also implicated in the spying? And a translator?

Then his son admits publicly that he also participated in the operation and even self-incriminated himself by releasing his own emails?

Wait. Then they have the FBI Director confirmation hearing the following day? A hearing for the position that the president admitted to the Russians he cleared so as to end the investigation?

Get the hell outta here! And don't come back to you give me something the American people might actually buy!"

Jr.publicly waived is right to plead the 5TH when he appears before the intel committee.
 
I agree with an earlier suggestion that if there's Russian interference the Obama admin knew about and sat on, then it was in the hopes of handing it to the expected Clinton admin to give them a year's worth of investigations, inquiries, and headlines while trying to pass it off as republican collusion, and not just Trump. They hoped to use that as a smear going into 2018 and 2020.

Bit them in the butt if they do have info but sat on it.

Typical cut and paste job lifted from one of the many right wing conspiracy "news"sites" :whistling: :lol:
 
Worth pointing out here that transparent D Jr. didn't disclose anything until the Fake News was publishing or about to publish it.

[twitter]https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/885081181980590084[/twitter]

The donald's director nominee testified he doesn't see it as a witch hunt and affirmed his support for Mueller.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
so, can you prove otherwise or look stupid?

What you did is obvious , stupid. No creditable publication would give any creedence to such a "story", it's a fabrication floated about by yellow "journalists" promoting an agenda and not reporting actual or factual news. Of course there's an audience for that type of stuff which makes it even sadder. :question:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Last thing I'll post tonight.

Speaking of Mogilevich, the FBI did a major roundup of both the Lucchese and the Russian mob about two months ago. In New York.

The giant Schneiderman-Mueller pincer move of the American republic is coming, folks.

Buckle up, little buckaroos.

12:31am?? You was up awful late watching the same chit over and over on CNN and still never got to yell gotcha.

Someone mentioned you had a forklift accident a couple weeks back. You do realize your suppose to honk your horn as you come up to an aisle, or atleast that's how I see Lowes do it when shopping there.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
so, can you prove otherwise or look stupid?

Conspiracy theories don't need to be proved otherwise. Nobody needs to prove to conspiracy theorists that Bush didn't orchestrate 9/11 and nobody needs to prove to them that we also did actually land on the moon. They'll never believe otherwise, no matter what the facts show. Because then they'll just question their legitimacy and eventually what a "fact" even is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
I have a hard time believing you typed this with a straight face.

I'll go you one further. Because she was a government official at the time, my prediction is that the GOP will convene some sort of committee to investigate it so as to have the taxpayers pay the bill for them to snipe at her.

Quote from a gator.
 

VN Store



Back
Top