TrumPutinGate

So the Russian lawyer is associated with FusionGPS who are the publishers of the bogus piss dossier.

Russian lawyer who met with Donald Trump Jr linked to investigation group behind salacious Steele Dossier | The Independent

Interesting timeline...

April 26th, 2016: Trump declares himself the presumptive GOP nominee.
April 29th, 2016: DNC learns its computer system has been breached.
April 30th, 2016: DNC hires CrowdStrike.
[Late April-Early May]: Democrats begin funding Fusion GPS.
May 1st, 2016: CrowdStrike determines Russia perpetrated the hack.
May 3rd, 2016: Reince Priebus declares Trump the presumptive GOP nominee.
June 9th, 2016: Don Jr. meets with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya at the apparent request of a Fusion GPS operative.
June 14th, 2016: The DNC publicly discloses the Russia hacked its computer network.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
The source for this claim is Mark Corallo, a GOP operative. What is Mr. Corallo's proof that the Russian lawyer is "linked" (whatever that means) to FusionGPS?

Veselnitskaya has a prior relationship with Fusion GPS as they worked together in defense of Prevezon, a Russian holding company in Cyrpus, against Justice Dept charges of money laundering.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Wife: "Hey honey where were you last night?"

Husband: "I was at the office. Real late night."

Wife: "Really because I saw you were at a restaurant..."

Husband: "Oh uhh... yeah. Me and the boys from work decided to grab a bite to eat."

Wife: "Well I saw you at the restaurant at a 2-person table with another woman."

Husband: "Ohh that's just Jackie. She doesn't get out much so I thought I'd buy her dinner for working so hard."

Wife: "I have all these text messages from her saying she wanted to hook up and that you were interested."

Husband: "Oh well yeah. See take a look at all my text messages that you already have. She says she wanted to hook up, and I was down for it, but then it just never happened."

Wife: "Well I applaud your transparency.


Or this:

Policeman to burglar: "You're under arrest for burglary. The neighbor saw you break a window and enter the house and called us. We caught you running away from the scene".

Burglar to policeman: "You can't arrest me for this. Since they didn't have anything worth stealing I've done nothing wrong".





.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 6 people
In fact, the meeting w Don Jr happened to abut with her work with Fusion GPS on the Prevezon case, which was abruptly settled by the US Govt.
 
Last edited:
Or this:

Policeman to burglar: "You're under arrest for burglary. The neighbor saw you break a window and enter the house and called us. We caught you running away from the scene".

Burglar to policeman: "You can't arrest me for this. Since they didn't have anything worth stealing I've done nothing wrong".

Or this:

Policeman to random person: "You're under arrest for the crime of murder. Even though I never saw the physical evidence, we have witness statements from the victim's friends that said you did it."

Suspect to policeman: "So, you're going off the word of others without ever seeing the evidence for yourself?"

Policeman to random person: "Yes, we believe it because they said so and wrote it down."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
Or this:

Policeman to random person: "You're under arrest for the crime of murder. Even though I never saw the physical evidence, we have witness statements from the victim's friends that said you did it."

Suspect to policeman: "So, you're going off the word of others without ever seeing the evidence for yourself?"

Policeman to random person: "Yes, we believe it because they said so and wrote it down."

Or this...

Policeman to suspect: "You're under arrest for the crime of murder. There is no eyewitness, but you denied ever meeting the victim. Then you changed your story and admitted to a casual momentarily meeting the victim, but well before the day of the murder. The you admitted being the last person to see the victim alive and the victim was blackmailing you, but claimed you had nothing to do with the murder"

Suspect to policeman: "So, you're arrest me without an eyewitness?"

Policeman to random person: "Yes, we believe it because you've repeatedly lied and now you've admitted a motive."
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
Or this...

Policeman to suspect: "You're under arrest for the crime of murder. There is no eyewitness, but you denied ever meeting the victim. Then you changed your story and admitted to a casual momentarily meeting the victim, but well before the day of the murder. The you admitted being the last person to see the victim alive and the victim was blackmailing you, but claimed you had nothing to do with the murder"

Suspect to policeman: "So, you're arrest me without an eyewitness?"

Policeman to random person: "Yes, we believe it because you've repeatedly lied and now you've admitted a motive."

I think mine is more apt.
 

VN Store



Back
Top