TrumPutinGate

[hog88]

I get a good sampling of your personal character and moral worth nearly every day on this forum.

Both are virtually non-existent.

Son you know ****.

 

[FLVOL69]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

Ratings

 

[InVOLuntary]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

She's an easy target. Put her on there then roast her after the interview. Dissect her every word and change it into something it wasn't.

 

[volprof]

Actual expert calls it what it is:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...f_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.2a8614719567

VolNation parody experts along shortly to tell us why he's wrong.

 

[CABVOL]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

The same reason GMA does: To argue and get ratings. George Snufulupogus loves arguing with Kellyanne.

 

[hog88]

Actual expert calls it what it is:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outl...f_story.html?tid=sm_tw&utm_term=.2a8614719567

VolNation parody experts along shortly to tell us why he's wrong.

Who's paying him?

 

[Vol8188]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

Ummm, have you ever watched fox? They always have someone giving the liberal side of an argument. Doesn't make them any less biased

 

[volprof]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

My wife and I were actually having this very discussion this morning. CNN takes the "be objective journalists" too far. They should never have Jeffrey Lords, Conways, Millers, Gorkas, etc. on. I've lost a good deal of respect for them and most just watch MsNBC now, when I'm watching news.

Also, the whole "liberal media" talking point is fake news. More Americans consume local news, which is primarily owned by conservative media groups like Sinclair, which require conservative talking point segments.

As we all know, talk radio - consumed by millions of American males - is primarily just a space for so-called "conservative" men, who think they're tough, to go and fondle one another. The left is barely even in the game.

Fake news.

 

[VolStrom]

Ummm, have you ever watched fox? They always have someone giving the liberal side of an argument. Doesn't make them any less biased

Whats wrong with having a bleeding heart liberal trying to explain why they want free sh!t for all?

 

[volprof]

Who's paying him?

Boris and Natasha.

 

[tumscalcium]

CNN fake news. On a serious note: If CNN was so liberal and slanted, why do they have kellyanne conway on their shows? Why do they feel it necessary to show what she has to say?

Are you saying that CNN is not liberal or liberally slanted?

 

[volprof]

Are you saying that CNN is not liberal or liberally slanted?

CNN is neither liberal nor liberal-slanted. I used to think they were, but they're not.

They just go with the ratings.

Also, while we're on this subject, let's retire the false Fox and MsNBC equivalency. One is a propaganda site meant to stir half of Americans into enraged frenzy (if not even violence), while the other is merely selective in its coverage. The two are not the same thing.

 

[McDad]

My wife and I were actually having this very discussion this morning. CNN takes the "be objective journalists" too far. They should never have Jeffrey Lords, Conways, Millers, Gorkas, etc. on. I've lost a good deal of respect for them and most just watch MsNBC now, when I'm watching news.

Also, the whole "liberal media" talking point is fake news. More Americans consume local news, which is primarily owned by conservative media groups like Sinclair, which require conservative talking point segments.

As we all know, talk radio - consumed by millions of American males - is primarily just a space for so-called "conservative" men, who think they're tough, to go and fondle one another. The left is barely even in the game.

Fake news.

MSNBC?

Thought you were an NPR guy?

Imo, NPR and BBC news is about as factual as can be found. NPR tends to editorialize in the news report though.

 

[VolStrom]

My wife and I were actually having this very discussion this morning. CNN takes the "be objective journalists" too far. They should never have Jeffrey Lords, Conways, Millers, Gorkas, etc. on. I've lost a good deal of respect for them and most just watch MsNBC now, when I'm watching news.

Also, the whole "liberal media" talking point is fake news. More Americans consume local news, which is primarily owned by conservative media groups like Sinclair, which require conservative talking point segments.

As we all know, talk radio - consumed by millions of American males - is primarily just a space for so-called "conservative" men, who think they're tough, to go and fondle one another. The left is barely even in the game.

Fake news.

It's interesting that you point that out. Being an old fart I have taken the local newspaper for decades and have now decided to cancel it. The Knoxville News-Sentinel was bought out by whatever company owns the USA Today network and they have become too liberal for my money. So they can kiss my $29 a month goodbye.

 

[Orange_Crush]

CNN is neither liberal nor liberal-slanted. I used to think they were, but they're not.

They just go with the ratings.

Also, while we're on this subject, let's retire the false Fox and MsNBC equivalency. One is a propaganda site meant to stir half of Americans into enraged frenzy (if not even violence), while the other is merely selective in its coverage. The two are not the same thing.

That's a very good point. It's nice to see we have a common ground.





























Fox is very selective about their coverage.

 

[volprof]

It's interesting that you point that out. Being an old fart I have taken the local newspaper for decades and have now decided to cancel it. The Knoxville News-Sentinel was bought out by whatever company owns the USA Today network and they have become too liberal for my money. So they can kiss my $29 a month goodbye.

Maybe you'll find a nursing home that only offers Sinclair.

 

[volprof]

MSNBC?

Thought you were an NPR guy?

Imo, NPR and BBC news is about as factual as can be found. NPR tends to editorialize in the news report though.

I primarily watch MsNBC if I'm watching one of the major cable news networks, but I consult numerous sources, ranging from newspapers to foreign sources to blogs to etc. etc.

I used to even watch some Fox, but after the Seth Rich thing, I refuse to and will not allow it to be viewed in my home. That is, without question, the most disgusting thing I've ever seen a "media source" do.

 

[Burger]

I primarily watch MsNBC if I'm watching one of the major cable news networks, but I consult numerous sources, ranging from newspapers to foreign sources to blogs to etc. etc.

I used to even watch some Fox, but after the Seth Rich thing, I refuse to and will not allow it to be viewed in my home. That is, without question, the most disgusting thing I've ever seen a "media source" do.

Seth Rich is the only thing that makes sense logically.

 

[Obsessed]

CNN is neither liberal nor liberal-slanted. I used to think they were, but they're not.

They just go with the ratings.

Also, while we're on this subject, let's retire the false Fox and MsNBC equivalency. One is a propaganda site meant to stir half of Americans into enraged frenzy (if not even violence), while the other is merely selective in its coverage. The two are not the same thing.

What ratings?
Cnn has none.

 

[samanderson]

The fact of the matter is nothing occurred it's been it's been over a year man come on .this is red scare bull**** all over again kill the Rosenbergs!

Dude, please. Do you realize you come across like someone who has been brainwashed by a cult? That, though, is pretty common with a number of posters on both the left and the right here. And it is very spooky. Jim Jones could have flourished with a goodly number of folks around this place.

I rarely post here, but I do check in from time to time hoping to see some speck of evidence that we are still a civilized society. My disappointment still reigns supreme.

 

[Burger]

Dude, please. Do you realize you come across like someone who has been brainwashed by a cult? That, though, is pretty common with a number of posters on both the left and the right here. And it is very spooky. Jim Jones could have flourished with a goodly number of folks around this place.

I rarely post here, but I do check in from time to time hoping to see some speck of evidence that we are still a civilized society. My disappointment still reigns supreme.

The internet is not the best thing to check for that.

 

[McDad]

I primarily watch MsNBC if I'm watching one of the major cable news networks, but I consult numerous sources, ranging from newspapers to foreign sources to blogs to etc. etc.

It's fun until the witch hunt ends.

Witch hunt being the term used recently by a Democrat.

 

[FLVOL69]

Dude, please. Do you realize you come across like someone who has been brainwashed by a cult? That, though, is pretty common with a number of posters on both the left and the right here. And it is very spooky. Jim Jones could have flourished with a goodly number of folks around this place.

I rarely post here, but I do check in from time to time hoping to see some speck of evidence that we are still a civilized society. My disappointment still reigns supreme.

I have a feeling you're going to be disappointed for the next 7 1/2 years

 

[VolStrom]

Maybe you'll find a nursing home that only offers Sinclair.

Maybe one of these days you'll realize that people older than you are mostly smarter than you.

 

[Mick]

CNN is neither liberal nor liberal-slanted. I used to think they were, but they're not.

They just go with the ratings.

Also, while we're on this subject, let's retire the false Fox and MsNBC equivalency. One is a propaganda site meant to stir half of Americans into enraged frenzy (if not even violence), while the other is merely selective in its coverage. The two are not the same thing.

Yep ratings.