lawgator1
Senior Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 72,099
- Likes
- 42,598
Question 1. Why aren't Trump, Jr., and Manafort willing to testify under oath?
Question 2. Why have they not been subpoenaed to force them to do so?
.Answer 1. Why the hell should they? If they were your client would you advise them to testify?
NO. I WOULD NOT. BUT THAT IS AS AN ATTORNEY. AS A CITIZEN, I WANT TO KNOW EVERYTHING THAT WENT ON AND WHY THEY AND THE PRESIDENT HAVE REPEATEDLY LIED ABOUT IT.
Answer 2. I think we've seen over the past decade congressional subpoenas are worthless, maybe the committee chairmen have come to understand this.
IT'S IMPORTANT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT HAPPENED.
Originally Posted by hog88 View Post
Answer 1. Why the hell should they? If they were your client would you advise them to testify?
NO. I WOULD NOT. BUT THAT IS AS AN ATTORNEY. AS A CITIZEN, I WANT TO KNOW EVERYTHING THAT WENT ON AND WHY THEY AND THE PRESIDENT HAVE REPEATEDLY LIED ABOUT IT.
Answer 2. I think we've seen over the past decade congressional subpoenas are worthless, maybe the committee chairmen have come to understand this.
IT'S IMPORTANT WE UNDERSTAND WHAT HAPPENED.
Worth repeating again. Trump spouts Putin's line rather than the repeated reports by American intelligence.
Ask yourself why.
[twitter]https://twitter.com/lrozen/status/889338617172291585[/twitter]
American intelligence also proved that you can mask the source of hacking to have originated from any other country...
Also, they've produced zero proof to support their claims, and even admit that it's impossible to really know for sure.
You're embarrassing yourself. The CIA and NSA have concluded it was Russia. Must be fake news--along with Trump's fawning behavior toward Putin, the various meetings (none of which acknowledged), past links to Russians, etc. I'm sure you can put 2 and 2 together, but you may not like to add. I guess that's it.
Russia intervened with Truman and Reagans reelection, but weren't successful. Without servers and today's technology.
that's the main issue here. The issue is that we have an American president who is very keen to defend a dictator who has meddled in our democratic process--who refuses to acknowledge the meddling/hacking and who instead wants to impugn the integrity of our own intelligence services in order to curry favor with Putin. That should disturb EVERYBODY, Republicans and Democrats alike
that's the main issue here. The issue is that we have an American president who is very keen to defend a dictator who has meddled in our democratic process--who refuses to acknowledge the meddling/hacking and who instead wants to impugn the integrity of our own intelligence services in order to curry favor with Putin. He also thinks that it's OK that independent U.S. institutions can be used to cover up his dealings with Russia. He obstructed justice with the firing of Comey and has made other attempts to do so, and he's still doing it. All of this should disturb EVERYBODY, Republicans and Democrats alike