TrumPutinGate

#17,332
#17,332
TennTom said:
Not sure what you're getting at.
Click to expand...
I haven’t honestly heard Graham pounding that drum in quite a while and that article is 13 months old.

Several Rs have stated recently they’d oppose the removal of Mueller but I’d say the defense of Sessions is not what it was 13 months ago.
 
#17,333
#17,333
BowlBrother85 said:
This gets back to the Sessions recusal. If Trump wanted an Attorney General who would oversee any investigation into his 2016 election campaign, then he should not have nominated a person for Attorney General who was a high profile member of that very same campaign. An Attorney General (with any integrity at all) is not going to oversee an investigation which involves him/her. That is just common sense. Trump has only himself to blame ... but of course, with Trump, his mistakes are always someone else's fault.
Click to expand...

I don’t have an issue with an impartial DOJ. I absolutely refuse to accept Rod Rosenstein as impartial in this matter and he also should have recused himself. His hands are all over this BS Russia Collusion made up narrative.
 
#17,334
#17,334
NorthDallas40 said:
I don’t have an issue with an impartial DOJ. I absolutely refuse to accept Rod Rosenstein as impartial in this matter and he also should have recused himself. His hands are all over this BS Russia Collusion made up narrative.
Click to expand...
Why should Rosenstein have recused himself? What matter, prior to the Russia probe, reveals either a conflict of interest or a potential bias on his part?
 
#17,335
#17,335
NorthDallas40 said:
I haven’t honestly heard Graham pounding that drum in quite a while and that article is 13 months old.

Several Rs have stated recently they’d oppose the removal of Mueller but I’d say the defense of Sessions is not what it was 13 months ago.
Click to expand...
He sponsored a bipartisan bill in the Senate Judiciary Committee to protect Mueller in late April. I'm not sure he's even on that train anymore. Something has happened.
 
#17,337
#17,337
BowlBrother85 said:
Why should Rosenstein have recused himself? What matter, prior to the Russia probe, reveals either a conflict of interest or a potential bias on his part?
Click to expand...

His finger prints (and actual signature) are all over the FISA warrants that form a good part of the background story for this whole Russia Collusion BS. But you knew that.

No way Rosenstein can have the perception of or be given the consideration of being impartial on this.
 
#17,339
#17,339
NorthDallas40 said:
Sessions is replaced with an AG that actually does his job.

New AG does his job and provides oversight of all DOJ business including the Mueller witch hunt. Rod is no longer needed in this role.

No need for Trump to replace Mueller at that point. He would have the oversight he is currently not held to.
Click to expand...

Sessions isn't going anywhere.
 
#17,341
#17,341
TennTom said:
He's not quite there yet, but Eric Swalwell will be a serious candidate for President soon.
He loathes Trump more than I do.
Click to expand...


GO TRUMP...........THERE'S A SERIOUS MOVEMENT WORKING BEHIND THE SCENES TO ABOLISH THE 22ND AMENDMENT IN THE NEXT YEAR...WHEN IT HAPPENS, HE'LL BE KING TRUMP
 
#17,343
#17,343
NorthDallas40 said:
His finger prints (and actual signature) are all over the FISA warrants that form a good part of the background story for this whole Russia Collusion BS. But you knew that.

No way Rosenstein can have the perception of or be given the consideration of being impartial on this.
Click to expand...
That doesn't reveal a bias against the Trump campaign at all. The surveillance of Carter Page began long before the Trump campaign even started. Paul Manafort was also under scrutiny by the Feds before being appointed Trump's campaign manager.
 
#17,344
#17,344
BowlBrother85 said:
That doesn't reveal a bias against the Trump campaign at all. The surveillance of Carter Page began long before the Trump campaign even started. Paul Manafort was also under scrutiny by the Feds before being appointed Trump's campaign manager.
Click to expand...

You probably believed Strzok too when he said he had no professional bias.

And yeah Manafort wasn’t worth prosecuting ten years ago. Suddenly he’s public enemy number 2 (right behind Trump). 🙄

And no the Page FISA warrant was first granted in Oct 2016 with two year reach back and two hops from Page. Pure coincidence I guess with Rod’s signature on it. 🙄
 
#17,346
#17,346
NorthDallas40 said:
You probably believed Strzok too when he said he had no professional bias.

And yeah Manafort wasn’t worth prosecuting ten years ago. Suddenly he’s public enemy number 2 (right behind Trump). 🙄

And no the Page FISA warrant was first granted in Oct 2016 with two year reach back and two hops from Page. Pure coincidence I guess with Rod’s signature on it. 🙄
Click to expand...
You are dead wrong about that. Page had been under surveillance long before the campaign began. With a high profile role (Manafort was campaign manager during the convention) in a presidential campaign, will come additional scrutiny and consequences if you are breaking laws (such as concealing assets and income from the federal government). Maybe Trump should have been hiring a better class of people? I don't suppose you have ever considered holding Trump accountable for these terrible hires, have you?
 
Last edited:
#17,349
#17,349
BowlBrother85 said:
You are dead wrong about that. Page had been under surveillance long before the campaign began. With a high profile role (Manafort was campaign manager during the convention) in a presidential campaign, will come additional scrutiny and consequences if you are breaking laws (such as concealing assets and income from the federal government). Maybe Trump should have been hiring a better class of people? I don't suppose you have ever considered holding Trump accountable for these terrible hires, have you?
Click to expand...

Wrong again B.B.! Womp womp

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cn...i-carter-page-surveillance-warrant/index.html

The more than 400-page document released Saturday, which includes the initial October 2016 FISA warrant on Page and three subsequent renewals, is heavily redacted.
Click to expand...

Btw nice edit to get rid of the “it was renewed” crap. No it was granted in Oct 2016 and renewed either two or three times after that. AFTER Trump was president elect.

It’s dirty as hell and Rosenstein is all over it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: SLICKYINC
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top