Checker_the_Shire
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2017
- Messages
- 2,667
- Likes
- 6,763
The point I’m making has nothing to do with quickness. I agree with you on quickness. If the goal is natty in two years, sure target only portal players and point your resources that direction. But in order to have long term, sustainable success, you have to have a base to build on, hence HS recruits. I would much rather have a long term plan that sees success for a solid decade than one year of strong run followed by years of mediocrity because all those guys left after 1 year and there was nothing in the reserves to step up and maintain the success.Again, change your perspective. The biggest obstacle to success is not adapting. This ain’t 1995. And you’re talking as if this thing has been around for decades. Usually the first one to do anything is ridiculed until it becomes the norm. Instead of saying this has never been done, think, damn maybe there is a new way this can be done.
The game is different. Not just slightly different, it’s completely different.
Top 3 recruiting classes in the last 3 years have lost more than a 25% of their 4 and 5 stars to the portal.
Thats not a blip, it’s a trend.
What quicker way to turn things around then to snag some guys who have experience at the level you’re trying to reach?
What Deion is doing in Colorado may work for Colorado now, but once he bolts to a bigger and better brand, what happens to Colorado then? If Saban leaves tomorrow, unless they just hire some Butch 3.0 (Beamer is 2.0), then the guy is set up for immediate success and has a solid foundation to build on. Can the same be said of whoever follows Deion in 2 years if he’s just been shopping portal and not HS?
Edit: hit reply in accident before I was done. But meant to say…so yes, you’re correct. It is about perspective but I’d also say it’s about what your main goal is: immediate success or long term sustainability?