85SugarVol
I prefer the tumult of Liberty
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2010
- Messages
- 32,523
- Likes
- 63,912
Pentagon Rolls Out 'Equity' Plan
Defense to Equalize Outcomes for Employees, Partners across Racial, Sexual and Gender Lines
The Department of Defense issued an equity report, aiming to equalize outcomes for employees and partners across racial, sexual and gender lines.
The DOD released its equity report alongside all other departments of President Biden's administration this week. In the text, the DOD explained a series of procedural changes to better align with the White House's demands for "equity."
"While the Department has historically focused on increasing equity within the DOD community, the collective actions described in this plan represent a shift in the Department’s approach and focus to better ensure that we leverage our capabilities to create opportunities for all Americans," the Department of Defense wrote in its report.
The DOD report offers a series of plans moving forward that "will identify potential barriers that underserved communities and individuals face regarding Federal programs."
Pentagon rolls out 'equity' plan
They should just fold the Marine Corps into the Army and be done with it. It's basically being destroyed from within.
The Marine Corps' plan to redesign the force will only end up breaking it
Wow..purely defensive force.
Defense will be favored over offense. Marines will not possess the type of units and equipment needed to “close with and destroy” an enemy.Infantry will no longer be the mainstay of the Corps; missiles and technologies are to be its strength.Without tanks and sufficient cannon artillery, there will be no basis for combined arms.Marines will not have a mobile, protected, direct-fire weapons system for the first time since 1923.
It’s all part of the Navy’s distributed warfare doctrine. I’m not saying it’s the right move.I just don't understand the why behind this decision.
It’s all part of the Navy’s distributed warfare doctrine. I’m not saying it’s the right move.
But it goes to your earlier point, and comments going back some 70 years now - just what the hell is the difference in the Army & Corps?
Long story short - Marines got out of their Armor & Artillery so they could return to the Sea.
The future of the Marine Corps (as long as China in the Pacific is the pacing threat) is smaller, more mobile, hunter-killer teams that can hop around and deploy anti-ship missiles.
They should just fold the Marine Corps into the Army and be done with it. It's basically being destroyed from within.
The Marine Corps' plan to redesign the force will only end up breaking it
Not enough NSW operators to duplicate what we are looking to do with the Marines. Don’t think we want them doing that anyways.That is what SOF is for.
Guess I can see dispersion as a solution though and seems to work in Ukraine. I think in any major peer war, all Big assets will be killed quickly. Munitions with precision just seem too lethal. An AEU would be sitting ducks even with included carrier support. Just look at the Falklands campaign.
Not enough NSW operators to duplicate what we are looking to do with the Marines. Don’t think we want them doing that anyways.
But yes, it’s all about this new push for distributed warfare. It’s why they want out of the Ticonderoga hulls.
You don’t want 1 platform loaded with 150 tomahawks.
You want 10 platforms loaded with 15 tomahawks each.
Not in today’s advanced missile technology environment.
Yea they are, and expensive to keep up too. Congress won’t let the Navy get out of them though, they just see a missile count.The Ticos are just worn out. Subs, B-21's and F-35B's are where we are headed.
Oh i was agreeing, the stealth aspect combined with that payload is probably unmatched. I wouldn’t want one lurking off my shores.It was meant a bit tongue in cheek, but honestly, that was probably the best use of an old missile sub. Easier to sneak in one boat carrying 154 TLAMs than six or more ships.