Spartacavolus
Big Member
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2010
- Messages
- 31,673
- Likes
- 191
It's almost like GSP doesn't try to finish a fight before it goes the distance. He's not a physical freak like some just a master technician at what he does. It's not the most entertaining but I respect it. He knew Diaz was no match on the ground & Diaz didn't do much when he had his chances.
Well IMO if he wants to be judged with the greats he has to finish someone. They talk about top p4p fighters and GSP and Silvia are the 2 mentioned. Again IMO GSP isn't even close to Anderson or Bones.
Then why did you respond to my post where I was discussing takedown points in the pan am games? I didn't say anything about ufc technique and power. Was just giving another example of takedowns earning more points than they should.
You really can't be that dense not to understand what I meant. Fighting not to lose, GSP and Jon Fitch, fighting to win Silva or Bones. It's really not hard to figure out.
I honestly don't think he wanted to finish Diaz & his last fight vs condit I believe he was rusty & condit is no slouch.
They spent more time standing than on the ground tonight. First 3 minutes of round 4 were up. Diaz couldn't do anything and he gsp wasn't running.
Just my opinion but take downs are an actual executed move versus attempted moves. I love seeing guys pull off the submission holds & counters but it takes more than just technique to do it.
I assume you mean "fighting to finish."
I'll say it a third time...GSP does what he has to do to win. It's really not that hard to figure out.
Then why ask what I meant? Oh cause it's you.
And I'll say it for a third time, GSP is the most boring champ in the history of the UFC....PERIOD. Which is all I said. I never said GSP wasn't effective, I said he was boring. You are trying to create an argument that I about something that i never even said. Kinda pathetic, like GSPs fighting style.
I asked you what you meant because you made a stupid statement about "fighting to win." If you meant "fighting to finish," then that's what you should have said.Then why ask what I meant? Oh cause it's you.
And I'll say it for a third time, GSP is the most boring champ in the history of the UFC....PERIOD. Which is all I said. I never said GSP wasn't effective, I said he was boring. You are trying to create an argument that I about something that i never even said. Kinda pathetic, like GSPs fighting style.
You said he must finish people to be considered one of the best, and I'm asking you why. Obviously, you are too dense to answer the question. I'm not creating anything.
I asked you what you meant because you made a stupid statement about "fighting to win." If you meant "fighting to finish," then that's what you should have said.
I said IMO. Can you not comprehend what that means? You are such a pathetically whiny human being. Also I said most boring champ ever, and he is.