Not necessarily against Oregon. That's apparantly up in the air now. They'll be worn at some point. The other discussed alt is dead.
They've sold light gray polos, jackets, and other "sideline" gear for a couple of years now, that's nothing newsworthy.
That was a possibility for a home game, yes. It's not happening. The gray will the only alternate worn during the regular season in a game TBD.
The game will be announced when the uniform is unveiled.
That was a possibility for a home game, yes. It's not happening. The gray will the only alternate worn during the regular season in a game TBD.
The game will be announced when the uniform is unveiled.
Did Oregon not agree to it or something ? I think there is something in the rules where both schools need to agree on a road uniform color other than white, unless its the true road uniform. BTW will the uniform be grey jersey, pants, helmet ? Any hint yet ?
That was a possibility for a home game, yes. It's not happening. The gray will the only alternate worn during the regular season in a game TBD.
The game will be announced when the uniform is unveiled.
Are they totally ditching the other alt, or will we maybe see it next season? I'm curious to see exactly what it would have looked like, even if the changes were subtle.
They will be doing an alt every year, so it's possible, but I would say that by next year there will be a whole new set of concepts from adidas to pick from.
There were dozens to pick from this year, you'll never see the ones that weren't selected.
DP, in a discussion in another section of VN, it was said that Adidas was a 'bad partner' for UT, supposedly by someone who has 'been inside the AD for years", and that UT would likely move towards Nike or UA.
Your thoughts? Primarily about the "bad partner" thing. The Nike/UA business has been covered.
Who said that? Based on everything that's been said here by people like DP who actually know, Adidas treats us way better than Nike would.
DP, in a discussion in another section of VN, it was said that Adidas was a 'bad partner' for UT, supposedly by someone who has 'been inside the AD for years", and that UT would likely move towards Nike or UA.
Your thoughts? Primarily about the "bad partner" thing. The Nike/UA business has been covered.
matt42012 said it. He said that he had seen a lot of players with stress fractures and foot injuries because of the footwear. He said he thinks Nike is our future.
Don't know what kind of credibility he has, but he's always seemed to have a bit of a inside knowledge.
It's in the "Cruitin' Football Talk" thread I think.
DP, in a discussion in another section of VN, it was said that Adidas was a 'bad partner' for UT, supposedly by someone who has 'been inside the AD for years", and that UT would likely move towards Nike or UA.
Your thoughts? Primarily about the "bad partner" thing. The Nike/UA business has been covered.
matt42012 said it. He said that he had seen a lot of players with stress fractures and foot injuries because of the footwear. He said he thinks Nike is our future.
Don't know what kind of credibility he has, but he's always seemed to have a bit of a inside knowledge.
It's in the "Cruitin' Football Talk" thread I think.