US may have killed Quds Force Commander Qasem Soleimani

#3,506
#3,506
Its getting worse.

President Trump suggested today that there was intelligence that Iranian general Qasem Soleimani was looking to blow up a US embassy.

“We caught a total monster. We took them out. And that should have happened a long time ago. We did it because they were looking to blow up our embassy. We also did it for other reasons that were very obvious. Somebody died…. People were badly wounded just a week before. And we did it," he said.

The administration has so far not been forthcoming on the imminent threat leading to the killing of Soleimani, citing protection of sources and methods.

Asked later about his comment that Iran was trying to blow up the American embassy in Baghdad, Trump referenced protests at the embassy at the start of last week.

He said it was "obvious" based on those protests what Iran's intentions were.
Click to expand...


He is drifting back and forth between preventing an imminent attack, and retribution for prior attacks.

I mean, if the guy was triggering a plan to blow up an embassy, I think anyone would be hard pressed to argue with taking him out. But then it seems to fall back on prior acts.

So which is it?
 
#3,507
#3,507
tvolsfan said:
Not yet. Just the recents you were talking about.
Click to expand...

Going back to my original statements .. why should we the public believe the a media that lies . Luther likes to dog Fox while ignoring the others . Keep in mind I said MEDIA. I haven’t even gotten to the others like NYTs,or WAPO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and tennvols77
#3,508
#3,508
lawgator1 said:
Its getting worse.




He is drifting back and forth between preventing an imminent attack, and retribution for prior attacks.

I mean, if the guy was triggering a plan to blow up an embassy, I think anyone would be hard pressed to argue with taking him out. But then it seems to fall back on prior acts.

So which is it?
Click to expand...
Who GAF? Either way the lib hero deserved to die
 
  • Like
Reactions: USMC-TNVOL, Orangeburst, kiddiedoc and 3 others
#3,509
#3,509
lawgator1 said:
Its getting worse.




He is drifting back and forth between preventing an imminent attack, and retribution for prior attacks.

I mean, if the guy was triggering a plan to blow up an embassy, I think anyone would be hard pressed to argue with taking him out. But then it seems to fall back on prior acts.

So which is it?
Click to expand...

He should just say it was both and do away with your verbage hang up . You are trying to hang him on the opinion it was not immediately necessary to do it right at that precise monument . It’s his judgment call that counts .
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64 and TrumpedUpVol
#3,510
#3,510
volfanjustin said:
Who GAF? Either way the lib hero deserved to die
Click to expand...


So you are saying Trump has been lying this whole time about the imminent attacks as justification to do it, and to do it now? Trump is lying?

Are you saying Trump is lying?

Let's be clear. Is Trump lying about this?
 
#3,511
#3,511
lawgator1 said:
Its getting worse.




He is drifting back and forth between preventing an imminent attack, and retribution for prior attacks.

I mean, if the guy was triggering a plan to blow up an embassy, I think anyone would be hard pressed to argue with taking him out. But then it seems to fall back on prior acts.

So which is it?
Click to expand...
I've noticed they like to throw out multiple rationales for actions, that way they avoid being locked down to just one.
 
#3,513
#3,513
lawgator1 said:
So you are saying Trump has been lying this whole time about the imminent attacks as justification to do it, and to do it now? Trump is lying?

Are you saying Trump is lying?

Let's be clear. Is Trump lying about this?
Click to expand...
Not only do I not know, and neither do you or the libs your worship in the dnc media, but I don't GAF why
 
  • Like
Reactions: C-south, AM64, allvol123 and 1 other person
#3,514
#3,514
lawgator1 said:
Its getting worse.




He is drifting back and forth between preventing an imminent attack, and retribution for prior attacks.

I mean, if the guy was triggering a plan to blow up an embassy, I think anyone would be hard pressed to argue with taking him out. But then it seems to fall back on prior acts.

So which is it?
Click to expand...
It is he needed killed. Stop with your propaganda adoring BS of a terrorist.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Zues1, AM64 and volfanjustin
#3,515
#3,515
volfanjustin said:
Not only do I not know, and neither do you or the libs your worship in the dnc media, but I don't GAF why
Click to expand...
And there you have it folks.
Trumpers don't GAF why. Trumpers don't GAF if Trump is lying to them while circumventing constitutional safeguards.
 
#3,516
#3,516
Mick said:
I've noticed they like to throw out multiple rationales for actions, that way they avoid being locked down to just one.
Click to expand...


Fair enough but that is expressly what did not happen here. Trump said, exclusively, that the reason for it was imminent attack coming from Soleimani. Pompeo said it. Others in the administration went out and said it. That was the ONLY explanation for several days.

Now it's more generic. Bad guy. Terrorist. Threat in the future, we don't know when.

Seems like the "imminent attack" line was an abject lie. Designed to justify an attack now so as to distract from impeachment trial. At least Lee and Paul willing to call him out on it. A shame to see so many other GOPers just go see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing on this. A complete abdication of their responsibilities.
 
#3,520
#3,520
lawgator1 said:
Fair enough but that is expressly what did not happen here. Trump said, exclusively, that the reason for it was imminent attack coming from Soleimani. Pompeo said it. Others in the administration went out and said it. That was the ONLY explanation for several days.

Now it's more generic. Bad guy. Terrorist. Threat in the future, we don't know when.

Seems like the "imminent attack" line was an abject lie. Designed to justify an attack now so as to distract from impeachment trial. At least Lee and Paul willing to call him out on it. A shame to see so many other GOPers just go see nothing, hear nothing, say nothing on this. A complete abdication of their responsibilities.
Click to expand...
I was speaking in more general terms as to all of the conflicting statements that have plagued this Administration . At one point the DOD said Soleimani was the mastermind of the Embassy protests.
 
#3,525
#3,525
tennvols77 said:
No, he doesn't know and you don't know either.

So much fuss over a dead pos terrorist.
Click to expand...

It has nothing to do with the terrorist . Ask Luther , he will tell you it’s always about getting rid of Trump with any legal means available to them . That’s why they have to screech about everything Trump does even if it makes them look like they are supporting a dead terrorist and a terrorist state .
 
  • Like
Reactions: MWR and volfanjustin
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top