- Joined
- Sep 30, 2004
- Messages
- 34,209
- Likes
- 50,388
I understand some of the MIL-SPEC stuff, but this also reminds me of the time one of my x-ray machines needed repairs. I was on vacation at the time and it was handled by our purchasing director.I'm assuming you are referring to toilet seats for an aircraft. What is the cost to the Mfg'r to have those toilet seats Mil-Spec'd and FAA certified? The answer will surprise you maybe.
I use to be bothered by those costs until I researched the cause. It's crazy but necessary in most cases.
Especially when if he'd bother to read the thread (those skills are clearly lacking) I pointed out just one of the grifts Chemonics and DAI used to do to ensure they're never held responsible.Pretty much
Oh, yeah. I got a comparable job after being laid off 10 months. I almost got fired because I refused the vaccine. I stalled long enough for the religious exempt forms to kick in.the dem socialists did not care when puddinhead was dishonorably discharging military personnel when they did not want the jab
In a 20g half sine shock profile a 10 lb piece now weighs 200 lbs. And the analysis is used to show the structural integrity of the item and the fasteners holding it to the airframe won’t yield under that load. That is an example of a basic analysis.So... the projectile weighs 50 tons instead?
A seatbelt on the toilet would have been the practical solution.We all agree that the test regime needs to align with the use. The onus is on the contracting authority to set those requirements. That means they need to know what the hell they are doing. .
Like I said the system is designed to produce the exact equipment they are getting… whether it makes sense or not.