Wade Houston (65-90, .419)
1989-90 16 14 10 8 T-4th
1990-91 12 22 3 15 T-8th
1991-92 19 15 8 8 3rd (E)
1992-93 13 17 4 12 6th (E)
1993-94 5 22 2 14 6th (E)
O'neill's record over 3 years was 36-47 so how is that any better than Houston's? Then he goes to Northwestern and spends 3 seasons with a record of 30-56. His last season was 5-25. Pearl won immediately with kids that were not his. Now he is winning with his recruits, even though we had a down year this past season compared to our current expectations. "IF" Pearl can recruit the right balance of talent, he will win a championship. I will take the proven winner all day long over a coach with a consistent losing track record.
Although stats can be skewed to favor anyone's argument, its still hard to see why anyone likes Kevin O'Neill as a coach. What is Kevin O'Neill's biggest accomplishment as a coach? Anyone?? Was his his
ONE sweet 16 appearance with a very talented Marquette team? Or perhaps his NCAA appearance that was handed to him by the NCAA solely to let the streak of NCAA appearances continue at Arizona? Or was it the remarkable accomplishment of not even winning a single conference game in the mighty Big Ten during his final season at Northwestern? (That was probably the hardest thing to do!)
Kevin O'Neill is a consistent loser, or mediocre at best. Pearl has accomplished more in his lone 4 years here at Tenn than O'Neill has accomplished in his career. Pearl has taken a Mid-Major just as far in the tourney as O'Neill did with Marquette. Regardless if he is "a friend" of yours or not, or if you are a huge O'Neill fan, you cannot logically state that O'Neill is a proven winner. O'Neill is not.
Pearl may not be a great X's and O's guy, and he may be a bit out there with the whole PR thing, but no way in hell I'd trade him for O'Neill.