The Breakerboy
DBU
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
- Messages
- 28,668
- Likes
- 8,885
i really don't think talent is the problem. if a football team's success would be solely up to the talent and players on the field, i seriously think ut would be up there in the top tier of the conference. coaching has had alot to do with where we are now.
the team I saw against UCLA looked damn slow at the skill positions on offense. half of the pac-10 has better speed at the skill positions than tenn.
USC is not faster, they're bigger.Cal
USC
Oregon
are much faster
ASU
OSU
UA
are probably faster
Yeah. I tell you what if Spurrier was our coach then our receivers would line up like this: G.Jones, D.Moore, L.Taylor, and Ahmad Paige. Then we would see if your so much faster than us. If anybody looked slow it was UCLA. Also I remember our experienced secondary of 06 making Desean Jackson look rather pedestrian.
wouldn't beat Hardesty, Creer and Poole like that. Best is clearly faster.I remember cal's speed last year shredding your team. Best and Vereen this year for cal would beat foster in a foot race by 10 yards.
I bet our D is miles faster and I guarantee you that there aren't 4 starters at Cal faster than all of UT's starters.Shows how little you know about pac-10 football. Cal has 4 players on offense faster than anyone on Tenn offense. Your defense is probably faster with berry and such but it isn't by a mile.
USC is not faster, they're bigger.
Cal might be faster because you run an easy to tackle scat back, a la Holliday at LSU.
Oregon didn't look faster in the game I watched.
The others simply aren't faster. You've let Arian Foster invade your thinking.
I remember cal's speed last year shredding your team. Best and Vereen this year for cal would beat foster in a foot race by 10 yards.
yeah best is easy to tackle that's why he is 3rd in the country in rushing. i'm telling you from an objective observer who was rooting for tenn. . .you looked slow on offense. It shocked me actually.