USC Please Give me a break.

#201
#201
droski said:
You don't realize how far you have fallen obviously. Cal isn't elite, nor is Tenn. Elite teams don't lose to that UCLA team.
Click to expand...

nobody is saying tenn is an elite team anymore. but one things for sure.....ut did not lose against ucla because of talent.
 
#204
#204
droski said:
example please? ASU is the only recent example and anyone with half a brain realized they were overrated. unfortunetly georgia is probably going to lay the wood on ASU and we'll have to hear about SEC dominance while the SEC completely disregards Tenn losing to Cal, UCLA, Penn State and Michigan beating florida and Wisconsin beating Auburn, yet takes two national championship games as some sort of divine evidence of sec superiority.
Click to expand...
Outside of USC who won the last NC for the PAC10?
 
#206
#206
duckman398686 said:
nobody is saying tenn is an elite team anymore. but one things for sure.....ut did not lose against ucla because of talent.
Click to expand...

true. you have better talent than UCLA. UCLA's talent probably puts them 6th in the pac-10. you lack of speed on offense is what kept UCLA in the game.

the problem was:
1) coaching
2) your slow wrs and rbs
3) your qb was horrible
 
#210
#210
VolfanMike said:
I'll answer it. Washington in 1991 and UCLA back in the sixties.
Click to expand...
That stat should end all conversation about why the SEC is more superior to the PAC 10. Sorry Droski, but outside of USC you guys are a bunch of middle of the road bottom feeders.
 
#211
#211
droski said:
true. you have better talent than UCLA. UCLA's talent probably puts them 6th in the pac-10. you lack of speed on offense is what kept UCLA in the game.

the problem was:
1) coaching
2) your slow wrs and rbs
3) your qb was horrible
Click to expand...

#1....ok

#2 is off. your basing your entire argument around foster for our rbs. hardesty was anything but slow.

as for #3.....i think what you saw from crompton was him at the lowest. i doubt he plays that bad again. if he does, i seriously put too much stock in him.
 
#216
#216
Listed below is every SEC versus Pac-10 head-to-head matchup going back to the year 2000.









2000 Alabama 24, UCLA 35 {PAC10}




2001 UCLA 20, Alabama 17 {PAC10}




2002 Auburn 17, USC 24 {PAC10} Mississippi State 13, Oregon 36 {PAC10}




2003 USC 23, Auburn 0 {PAC10} LSU 59, Arizona 13 {SEC} Oregon 42, Mississippi State 34 {PAC10}




2004 Oregon State 21, LSU 22 {SEC}




2005 Arkansas 17, USC 70 {PAC10} LSU 35, Arizona State 31 {SEC}




2006 USC 50, Arkansas 14 {PAC10} Washington State 14, Auburn 40 {SEC}Arizona 3, LSU 45 {SEC} California 18, Tennessee 35 {SEC}




2007 Tennessee 31, California 45 {PAC10}

The Pac-10 ends up with a 9-6 record against the SEC. So much for the speed and athleticism of the SEC catching up with them.




The most alarming part is that if we take the two powerhouses, USC and LSU, out of the equation, the Pac-10 is 5-2 against the SEC.




It's interesting how every SEC fan who wants to derail the "Pac-10 Football Is Better Than SEC Football" argument claims the Pac-10 proponents only lean on USC. Well, we took them out of the equation—and the Pac-10 still rules the day.




There's not much else to say on this topic: The Pac-10 is better against SEC opponents than the SEC is against Pac-10 opponents.




I don't know what SEC fans are going to do to explain this one. Maybe they'll claim that the SEC doesn't try out of conference, or that the game wasn't big enough so they probably just threw it.




Whatever excuses are made by SEC fans, the fact remains that the Pac-10 has a 9-6 record against the SEC since 2000. If you take out USC and LSU, the Pac-10 owns a 5-2 record.
 
#217
#217
The elite Pac10 teams beat up middle of the road B12 teams. That does not say much for the Pac10 in my book.
 
#219
#219
droski said:
I thought the SEC middle of the road teams would win the pac-10 and dominate?
Click to expand...
I never said that. I was just saying from top to bottom the SEC is the most superior league. USC will do great in whatever conference they are put in.
 
#221
#221
droski said:
I thought the SEC middle of the road teams would win the pac-10 and dominate?
Click to expand...

I never said that, but its not far from the truth. After USC, Oregon, and Cal at times, who else on that coast is any good? I mean really Droski, you cant, and I know you're not hanging your argument on UCKLA beating Tennessee this year. You're certainly not hanging on to it with Cal's Cotton bowl win over aTm so....Im making the point that Pac 10 teams would not survive in the SEC. Heck, they wouldnt survive in the B12.

Your looking at top schools in the NCAA out of both conferences vs only 2, maybe 3 schools out of the Pac 10. It aint happening man.
 
#223
#223
HATINGBAMAISAWAYOFLIFE said:
I hate to say it but I think USC by far the best team in the country right now.
they may beat osu by 30
Click to expand...
I think USC is the best in the country to. But, it seems they always drop a game or two that they should have won. I would have loved to have seen them and UGA play last year. Both teams were at the peak of their game.
 
#224
#224
HATINGBAMAISAWAYOFLIFE said:
I hate to say it but I think USC by far the best team in the country right now.
they may beat osu by 30
Click to expand...

Kill that noise. I think OSU will give everybody the game they expect. I think they tried to cruise through a Frank Solich coached team that came to play. But they'll be alright. Heck may pull an upset if they up to their talent level.
 
#225
#225
Lockdown1 said:
Why don't you stop with your nonsense. You just will never get respect down here. Your conference is a rinky dink conference that's it that's all to it.
Click to expand...

let me ask you a serious question. how many pac-10 games have you watched over the past 3 years?
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top