You didn’t read my other thread. Alabama and Georgia have dropped every time they lost the championship game. Over the past seven years. Why should this year be different?I don't think either team has a right to biotch either way. Very even resumes. And I don't see UGA dropping if they lose in the SEC title game. The committee can not let schools be punished for conference championship losses. Otherwise the noise to make them go away increases. That's bad for business. Don't care what's happened in the past. New day new playoff new rules
Bc the whole system is different. They are not going to punish a team for losing in the conference championship. You already have coaches mouthing off about not wanting to go if it will hurt them. This is big business. It's not about right or wrong or how they did it yesterday. I'm just telling you what's going to happen and why.You didn’t read my other thread. Alabama and Georgia have dropped every time they lost the championship game. Over the past seven years. Why should this year be different?
You didn’t read my other thread. Alabama and Georgia have dropped every time they lost the championship game. Over the past seven yI don't think either team has a right to biotch either way. Very even resumes. And I don't see UGA dropping if they lose in the SEC title game. The committee can not let schools be punished for conference championship losses. Otherwise the noise to make them go away increases. That's bad for business. Don't care what's happened in the past. New day new playoff new rules
And I’m telling you you’re wrong. Georgia will be in the 8/9 game if they lose. Guess we will see.Bc the whole system is different. They are not going to punish a team for losing in the conference championship. You already have coaches mouthing off about not wanting to go if it will hurt them. This is big business. It's not about right or wrong or how they did it yesterday. I'm just telling you what's going to happen and why.
How about the fact that in their last game they looked horrid and scored a mere 10 points on their home field to a 6 win team and their coach will be fired as soon as the season ends?
Game Opponent H/A SOR Opponent H/A SOR 1 UTC Home FCS Akron Home 111 2 NCSt Neutral 68 WMich Home 103 3 Kent Home 134 Marsh Home 40 4 OU Away 31 MSU Away 66 5 Ark Away 45 Iowa Home 37 6 UF Home 25 Ore Away 1 7 Bama Home 10 Neb Home 52 8 UK Home 63 PSU Away 4 9 MissSt Home 105 Pur Home 117 10 UGA Away 2 NW Away 85 11 UTEP Home 127 IU Home 8 12 Vandy Away 41 Mich Home 30
We played an FCS team, so it's only fair to drop OSU's highest number for comparison.
SOR Points
UT 651
OSU 537*
Points Per Game For-Against
UT 34-15
OSU 36-11*
Yards Per Game For-Against
UT 440-283
OSU 423-242
-We are both 10-2
-We both played 4 away games
-We both average +0.5 Turnover margin
On paper, OSU looks like the slightly better team. They did not play an FCS opponent this year, which helps them, and their average opponent strength is above ours. Considering their Playoff presence the last few years/brand recognition/etc, I do not anticipate we get put in over them unless the committee uses some logic-less word salad reason.
Yeah but "not punishing" them can mean dropping them to the 12 seed but still leaving them in the playoffs.Bc the whole system is different. They are not going to punish a team for losing in the conference championship. You already have coaches mouthing off about not wanting to go if it will hurt them. This is big business. It's not about right or wrong or how they did it yesterday. I'm just telling you what's going to happen and why.
The logic is protect the championship games. With UGA it's even easier to wash away. They've already beaten Texas. So it's a wash. I don't think you all understand how the committee will not allow conference championship games to be viewed as a henderence. Can't happenYeah but "not punishing" them can mean dropping them to the 12 seed but still leaving them in the playoffs.
To say that you can lose a huge title game and not drop a single spot in the rankings is utter lunacy.
If Georgia loses they still deserve to be a playoff team but NOT a host team.
You would never say that if Texas lost that they would not drop and not be any consequences! That's terrible logic.
Well it’s a bit worse, 2 guys are from Missouri and we know Missouri hates the Vols due to a couple of 65 point beat downs. Wait, maybe that is the Michigan sentiment and it helps us? No wait actually OH St never beats Michigan so they like them highly rated. Oh well!Chairman is from michigan, one other member played at Nebraska, but when they where Big12 not big10. The rest are scattered across the country. Sec has 1 dude from Arkansas.
The logic is protect the championship games. With UGA it's even easier to wash away. They've already beaten Texas. So it's a wash. I don't think you all understand how the committee will not allow conference championship games to be viewed as a henderence. Can't happen
If this is the logic then Clemson should be in the playoffs without question because they are the second best team in the ACC win or lose.The logic is protect the championship games. With UGA it's even easier to wash away. They've already beaten Texas. So it's a wash. I don't think you all understand how the committee will not allow conference championship games to be viewed as a henderence. Can't happen
My projections have us easily in front of OSU. It seems some people haven't watched the OSU MICH game.
You can't un-see that. It's too fresh..........
It's not like they looked good at all. If the people on the committee watched the game (as they should have) we should be good.