volbound1700
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2007
- Messages
- 8,610
- Likes
- 12,019
NIL isn't meant to bring parity to schools. In fact, it's not meant to bring anything to any school. It's for the individual athlete's right to make a living off of their name, image and likeness.
I get that but it is bringing more parity than the old system which seemed to be setup to support only 2-3 schools. The NCAA wasn't creating parity but doing the opposite.
College Football was quickly becoming the Alabama, Clemson, Ohio State show and it lost a ton of fan support/energy as a result. I mean, why watch as a Tennessee fan when you are losing 15 straight against a rival and have no shot at competing?
To me, it is like playing monopoly and having a player start with Board Walk, Park Place, and $ 1000 extra dollars. They are going to win most of the time in that scenario. The system was setup that way for Alabama to win at the expense of its rivals. As I cited in another post, LSU, Auburn, Ole Miss, and Tennessee all faced NCAA Investigations during Saban era but no one touched Alabama and Saban despite players talking about getting paid and the Jeremy Pruitt connections to Saban and Smart.