Volfan2012
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2012
- Messages
- 34,288
- Likes
- 63,155
Minutiae covering all the bases can be worked out in a nanosecond. There may be a lawyer in the whole bunch.They can, and probably will, but that doesn't address the elephant in the room.
That committee, if it doesn't compensate players, will be in violation of Federal Antitrust Law.
That committee, if it does compensate players, will be a pro sports league.
The sad thing is: lots of colleges cannot afford to pay football and basketball players, much less when other sports sue to be treated equally and paid also.Maybe college football finally gets recognized as what it really is G-league for the NFL.
If it could, the NCAA and/or SEC, B1G, etc would have worked it out.Minutiae covering all the bases can be worked out in a nanosecond. There may be a lawyer in the whole bunch.
Money isn’t dependent on the NCAA swooping in and threatening Steve Alford’s eligibility because he participated in a charity calendar. Big 10 could have ruled on that and shot it where it belongs without the spectacle. The SEC suspended Bruce Pearl from the first six games of the season outside of the NCAA’s behest…easy speazy. And it was the CONFERENCE that investigated Jauan Jennings for that sideline scrum against Vandy which led to him missing the first part of the bowl game. Conferences have the mainframe and structure to make their own unfair decisions. They don’t need the stuffed suits in Indianapolis.If it could, the NCAA and/or SEC, B1G, etc would have worked it out.
I'm skeptical there's a solution. It's VERY MUCH in the NCAA's financial interest and the financial interest of schools making huge media money to get this worked out ASAP.
Yet, no one has suggested a solution that isn't a pro-lite league formation.
You seriously believe they’ve been Joe Colleges from ole State U?They can, and probably will, but that doesn't address the elephant in the room.
That committee, if it doesn't compensate players, will be in violation of Federal Antitrust Law.
That committee, if it does compensate players, will be a pro sports league.
Congress can pass legislation on this stuff, but if you’ve read the SCOTUS decisions and some of the justices comments, particularly Kavanaugh,any attempt to legislate around this is as good as dead on arrival. 9-0 on the Alston case, so it’s not a split decision down ideological lines. You can’t mess with antitrust and interstate commerce and that’s exactly what the NCAA is trying to do. It’s a non-starter.I think they are trying to use this to get Congress to move on legislation that will benefit them. They know after SCOTUS they are in no man’s land.
The problem remains: interstate commerce is controlled by Federal Antitrust Law. If TN never plays outside of the state, sure...... abide by state laws and let's go.Money isn’t dependent on the NCAA swooping in and threatening Steve Alford’s eligibility because he participated in a charity calendar. Big 10 could have ruled on that and shot it where it belongs without the spectacle. The SEC suspended Bruce Pearl from the first six games of the season outside of the NCAA’s behest…easy speazy. And it was the CONFERENCE that investigated Jauan Jennings for that sideline scrum against Vandy which led to him missing the first part of the bowl game. Conferences have the mainframe and structure to make their own unfair decisions. They don’t need the stuffed suits in Indianapolis.
He will actually conference knows where this goes and it’s not just after Tennessee
No. Not at all. It's been dirty for decades. Players have been being paid for a long time.You seriously believe they’ve been Joe Colleges from ole State U?
Conference agreements trump all that. You’re interjecting doomsday scenarios when there’s billions of dollars that says sanity prevails.The problem remains: interstate commerce is controlled by Federal Antitrust Law. If TN never plays outside of the state, sure...... abide by state laws and let's go.
If TN plays vs GA, the players become subject to Federal Antitrust jurisdiction. Alston v NCAA already suggested the entire "student-athlete" model isn't workable and will lose in court. The SEC is just as subject to Federal law as the NCAA.
Without that, GA can just pass laws that paying players is fine, players staying until their 35-40yo is fine, etc and the SEC can't do anything either. It's chaos to allow each state to have vastly different laws when it comes to commerce because each state just tries to "out screw" the other states.
Again you’re not seeing the end here. This isn’t about Tennessee it’s about NIL. Tennessee is just the highest profile target that the NCAA had the most leverage on. It does not end with Tennessee. Any program that benefitted from nil is a target.I'm not so convinced he will unless a sacred cow is in the NCAA's sights.
The NCAA is not going to look into Texas or Texas A&M given the risk of really big money backing those schools. And you cannot compare the fever of that backing with the Big10 and even Michigan, although we basically saw Harbaugh say screw you NCAA.