Vaccine or not?

[kiddiedoc]

All one has to is speak with someone who cuts hair..sounds stupid but hey

Yeah, the large group of local Pediatricians and Subspecialists here that were ready to leave Staff if Children's Hospital started requiring the shots are probably all idiots, too, with me.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Ekeng and Nouri had cardiac events in consecutive years too, why pray tell would it matter whether they are on the same team or different teams doctor? You think heart problems are contagious?

You're probably right. You're the expert.

 

[kiddiedoc]

Keep in mind that post-shot myocarditis is much more common in adolescent and young adult males than younger children.

 

[NashVol11]

You're probably right. You're the expert.

We watched you in real time find out a random anecdote and make it your entire argument, so it's very clearly not you

 

[Orangeburst]

View attachment 565526

When do anecdotes matter? I must of had several dozen anecdotes over the years with people that do not discuss politics

 

[kiddiedoc]

We watched you in real time find out a random anecdote and make it your entire argument, so it's very clearly not you

We who? I've been following this info for 3.5 years and read the EUA when deciding my stance on the shots. Where have you been?

Here, two simple questions (this is how we do science):

1. Are there appreciable, possibly life- threatening risks to young people taking the shots?

2. What is the benefit of administering CV19 shots to children/young adults?

I will appreciate your response.

 

[NashVol11]

We who? I've been following this info for 3.5 years and read the EUA when deciding my stance on the shots. Where have you been?

Here, two simple questions (this is how we do science):

1. Are there appreciable, possibly life- threatening risks to young people taking the shots?

2. What is the benefit of administering CV19 shots to children/young adults?

I will appreciate your response.

I would retreat back to talking points too if I made the ghoulish suggestion that Bronny has a vaccine injury and then couldn't back it up experts, amirite?

 

[NashVol11]

Ekeng and Nouri had cardiac events in consecutive years too, why pray tell would it matter whether they are on the same team or different teams doctor? You think heart problems are contagious?

"I will appreciate your response" lmao

 

[NashVol11]

It’s not a growing number, there are just more conspiracy weirdos that care. It’s been the leading cause of death for young athletes for decades now. Feel free to support your opinion with statistics on athletes as opposed to “I heard today that it’s 2 people from the same team!!!!” anecdotal garbage

"I will appreciate your response" x2

Well, other than this. Lmao

2. On. The. Same. Team.

 

[kiddiedoc]

"I will appreciate your response" lmao

Ok thanks. Good talk.

 

[NashVol11]

Ok thanks. Good talk.

So no response hahahahahahaha "experts"

 

[Orangeburst]

Ok thanks. Good talk.

You are dealing with an immature person that cannot have a response without a LOL..Check the stats.
Very weak for some high IQ guy

 

[kiddiedoc]

Remember when you numbskulls lmao'd and insulted us for suggesting that the virus came from a lab, that cloth masks are useless, that kids needed to go back to school immediately, and that shots would not stop a respiratory virus from mutating and spreading?

Good times.

 

[DC_Vol]

Remember when you numbskulls lmao'd and insulted us for suggesting that the virus came from a lab, that cloth masks are useless, that kids needed to go back to school immediately, and that shots would not stop a respiratory virus from mutating and spreading?

Good times.

I remember when the branding was this is now a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”. Straight up lies!

 

[kiddiedoc]

I remember when the branding was this is now a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”. Straight up lies!

"If you take these vaccines, you aren't going to catch COVID." - Joe Biden

 

[rekinhavoc]

"If you take these vaccines, you aren't going to catch COVID." - Joe Biden

Vaxxed & 2X Boosted Sen. Durbin is COVID Positive For 3rd Time in a Year.

 

[VolinWayne]

I would retreat back to talking points too if I made the ghoulish suggestion that Bronny has a vaccine injury and then couldn't back it up experts, amirite?

To totally write off or dismiss the covid vaccine as possibly being the cause of cardiac issues (when it's known to cause myocarditis) is just as dumb as saying it's definitely the vaccine that's causing it. There has never been a time when this many well know athletes and movie actors are having career ending health issues. We all know that there have always been heart issues....just not nearly this many

 

[kiddiedoc]

To totally write off or dismiss the covid vaccine as possibly being the cause of cardiac issues (when it's known to cause myocarditis) is just as dumb as saying it's definitely the vaccine that's causing it. There has never been a time when this many well know athletes and movie actors are having career ending health issues. We all know that there have always been heart issues....just not nearly this many

Often, silence speaks louder than words.

Why are we not aloud to entertain the possibility? Do people not care if the vaccine might have been/is a huge mistake for young people?

 

[Orangeburst]

Dang this is ugly truth

 

[Orangeburst]

So no response hahahahahahaha "experts"

I will take a Physician response over some one who espouses his HS SAT scores...
That is funny as shirt.

 

[newyorkvol]

In case anyone cares…..

7 Core Elements of the Scientific Inquiry Process
From encouraging scientific questions to facilitating well-reasoned conclusions, the scientific inquiry process helps illuminate our understanding of the world. Here are seven core elements to the scientific inquiry process:

1. 1. Asking constant questions: At the center of both the scientific method and general scientific inquiry lies the ability to ask questions well. Make observations about a particularly interesting phenomenon and then pose questions about why such a thing happens. Let preexisting scientific theories guide your questioning, but keep in mind every theory continues to be just that—a theory—until scientific inquiry definitively proves or disproves it.
2. 2. Testing your inferences: Scientific progress hinges on your ability to experiment and test inferences about evidence. To do so, you need to set up an independent variable (something you will use to test) and a dependent variable (the thing or things you are testing). Seeing how well your inferences or predictions match up with the reality of a given experiment is essential to scientific inquiry.
3. 3. Making connections: As you make observations about a specific phenomenon, make connections with every other relevant topic you can remember from your past science lessons or research. Scientific knowledge is as much a result of old realizations as it is of new discoveries.
4. 4. Seeking evidence: As you seek to understand the natural world, there’s no substitute for hard evidence. Collect data and gather evidence relentlessly throughout your scientific investigations. The more evidence you have to answer your initial questions, the more ironclad your ultimate case will be when you draw conclusions.
5. 5. Classifying data correctly: Science is as much a process of data collection and classification as it is of asking and answering questions. This means knowing how to elucidate or graph out your discoveries in a way other people can understand. It also means using citations from other scientific journals and texts to bolster your ultimate argument as to why a particular phenomenon occurs.
6. 6. Drawing conclusions: Eventually, you need to draw conclusions from the data you collect. After you’ve made an exhaustive study of your specific focus, use inductive reasoning to make sense of all the new evidence you’ve gathered. Scientific ideas are always malleable and never completely concrete—alternative explanations are always possible, and new evidence should lead to new questions and conclusions.
7. 7. Sharing findings: Science is an innately group-centered discipline. The more people interpret data, the better chance there is to ensure there are no loopholes in new research. No one person’s understanding of science content is infinite, so it’s important to let other qualified people ask questions of your conclusions. Natural science is more of a never-ending collaborative process than one with a concrete point of termination.

 

[Orangeburst]

In case anyone cares…..

7 Core Elements of the Scientific Inquiry Process
From encouraging scientific questions to facilitating well-reasoned conclusions, the scientific inquiry process helps illuminate our understanding of the world. Here are seven core elements to the scientific inquiry process:

1. 1. Asking constant questions: At the center of both the scientific method and general scientific inquiry lies the ability to ask questions well. Make observations about a particularly interesting phenomenon and then pose questions about why such a thing happens. Let preexisting scientific theories guide your questioning, but keep in mind every theory continues to be just that—a theory—until scientific inquiry definitively proves or disproves it.
2. 2. Testing your inferences: Scientific progress hinges on your ability to experiment and test inferences about evidence. To do so, you need to set up an independent variable (something you will use to test) and a dependent variable (the thing or things you are testing). Seeing how well your inferences or predictions match up with the reality of a given experiment is essential to scientific inquiry.
3. 3. Making connections: As you make observations about a specific phenomenon, make connections with every other relevant topic you can remember from your past science lessons or research. Scientific knowledge is as much a result of old realizations as it is of new discoveries.
4. 4. Seeking evidence: As you seek to understand the natural world, there’s no substitute for hard evidence. Collect data and gather evidence relentlessly throughout your scientific investigations. The more evidence you have to answer your initial questions, the more ironclad your ultimate case will be when you draw conclusions.
5. 5. Classifying data correctly: Science is as much a process of data collection and classification as it is of asking and answering questions. This means knowing how to elucidate or graph out your discoveries in a way other people can understand. It also means using citations from other scientific journals and texts to bolster your ultimate argument as to why a particular phenomenon occurs.
6. 6. Drawing conclusions: Eventually, you need to draw conclusions from the data you collect. After you’ve made an exhaustive study of your specific focus, use inductive reasoning to make sense of all the new evidence you’ve gathered. Scientific ideas are always malleable and never completely concrete—alternative explanations are always possible, and new evidence should lead to new questions and conclusions.
7. 7. Sharing findings: Science is an innately group-centered discipline. The more people interpret data, the better chance there is to ensure there are no loopholes in new research. No one person’s understanding of science content is infinite, so it’s important to let other qualified people ask questions of your conclusions. Natural science is more of a never-ending collaborative process than one with a concrete point of termination.

I would say the gov and BF met Negative Zero. Who's fault is it for the discourse?

 

[Ttucke11]

I would retreat back to talking points too if I made the ghoulish suggestion that Bronny has a vaccine injury and then couldn't back it up experts, amirite?

I'm not saying it did or didn't but I find it odd when someone becomes irrationally angry when people....ask questions.

 

[headhunter15]

We haven't had a single suspicious cardiac issue arise in the past two years. That being said, I would estimate that less than 5% of my adolescent population took the shots, and basically 0% of the younger kids.

We do have a family who lost its father with what was deemed "myocardial damage secondary to CV vaccine" (per family report of death certificate).

Have you had patients or know of patients who developed myocarditis months or even a year after the vaccine or booster? I’ve been told and read that if it happens, it’s usually without the first couple of weeks.

I ask because I wonder if Bronny had been boosted or perhaps a case of Covid within the last month.

 

[Ttucke11]

Often, silence speaks louder than words.

Why are we not aloud to entertain the possibility? Do people not care if the vaccine might have been/is a huge mistake for young people?

That's been the biggest thing for me. Open and shut. Safe and effective. No chance it has side effects. Even though a simple aspirin has a laundry list of potential side effects. This shot? None.

And **** anyone for even asking. It's a weird, cultish mindset.