Yes I do somewhat but I still do not understand your stance on the vaccines. You have admitted that the spike protein from covid is causing major health issues but at the same time it seems like you want to simply ignore the spike protein from the vaccine that was mandated in so many places. Also how do you dismiss VAERS (it's generally very under-reported) into consideration and look at the huge increase in adverse reactions that was reported after the vaccine was forced on the public. How do you dismiss the well-known fact that a side effect of the vaccine is myocarditis?
I’m not dismissing anything.
The fact remains that the numbers are the same for the unvaccinated as the vaccinated. If the vaccine was the problem that would not be the case. If the vaccine never existed then the side effects numbers would be the exact same as they are now.
Another fact is the side effects have not appeared in any other MNRA trial (to date) just in the covid placing the blame on the disease itself instead of the vaccine. let’s just be honest what the numbers say today.
Since you didn’t ask but assumed incorrectly……
we can say a lot about the vaccine.
-Did it prevent Covid as advertised?
Nope
-Did it reduce severity of the disease.
In the first 2 mutations, yes after that no.
These are the numbers. It doesn’t change because I want them to say something else.
From the numbers I can say that you’re doing exactly what you accuse me of. Ignoring evidence to support your belief.
How about politics
-should it have been mandated?
Absolutely not.
-does that have anything to do with the side effects debate
Nope.
Let’s try this another way.
People who regularly eat bacon are at a higher risk for cancer. If bacon wasn’t the cause then there would not be a higher rate of cancer among the bacon eaters. It would be like the vaccine where the side effects are the same for both groups.
but I digress