Vaccine or not?

The public having access to VAERS during a highly polarized time is what creates the issue with validity. It is being flooded with fraudulent data from multiple vectors and with multiple purposes.

If VAERS is to become a useful tool again, it needs to be limited to input only by authorized, credentialed medical personnel with no public facing interface.
"Knowingly filing a false VAERS report is a violation of Federal law (18 U.S. Code § 1001) punishable by fine and imprisonment."

Given that the events are reviewed by the CDC and FDA and false reporting is breaking federal law. The fact that people are not being charged showed merrit to the reporting....only reporting on VAERS is fact checker and left leaning sources trying to disprove the numbers. Logically a person would trust a system that has been trusted for 30, but suddenly now it's untrustworthy. Most people didn't even know what VAERS was until the numbers were reported for covid vaccines...I'm sure there are some fools that have reported things that are false, not sure why in the highly polarized time they are not being prosecuted, but all these deaths are reviewed by CDC and FDA.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
My wife’s boss did a group call involving himself and the other employees to tell them he began feeling sick on Saturday, got tested and was positive for covid. He told them he was vaccinated, but urged them to consider vaccination as well to prevent spreading it among each other.
😂😂 I was like uhhh…
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
I don't but pro vax and dems flock like moths to a frame whenever something go against your narrative

Well if you agree that the promised BIG BOMBSHELL VIDEO isn’t worthwhile proof of anything, then yeah people are probably going to “flock” in and say that. If I post a video of some person saying the sky is yellow and people say that’s wrong, are they flocking in because of a narrative?
 
"This 15 year old got blood clots 3 weeks after the vaccine"
"How do you know the blood clots were a result of the vaccine?"

(I'm expecting an answer like: "Because mRNA vaccines have this specific impact on the bloodstream and on functions that lead to clotting")
Nope. Her answer:
"Because he's a healthy 15-year-old so he shouldn't have clots"

LOL
Do you think there’s any chance it was due to the vaccine?
 
Who is the first pro vax to comment and try and discredit this???
It's like you challenge yourself everyday to fall for bull ****. Do yourself a favor and stop using the internet. You are way too gullible. Quick test. If you believe any of the following you should not use the internet:

Obama wasn't born in the US
Pizza Gare
Trump won the election
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
"This 15 year old got blood clots 3 weeks after the vaccine"
"How do you know the blood clots were a result of the vaccine?"

(I'm expecting an answer like: "Because mRNA vaccines have this specific impact on the bloodstream and on functions that lead to clotting")
Nope. Her answer:
"Because he's a healthy 15-year-old so he shouldn't have clots"

LOL
I haven't watched it, but she isn't wrong. That's quite unheard of, unless he had a genetic hypercoaguable condition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Obsessed
It's like you challenge yourself everyday to fall for bull ****. Do yourself a favor and stop using the internet. You are way too gullible. Quick test. If you believe any of the following you should not use the internet:

Obama wasn't born in the US
Pizza Gare
Trump won the election
Oh man you got me...Show me where i supported the video and illl erase right....
 
Well if you agree that the promised BIG BOMBSHELL VIDEO isn’t worthwhile proof of anything, then yeah people are probably going to “flock” in and say that. If I post a video of some person saying the sky is yellow and people say that’s wrong, are they flocking in because of a narrative?
Thats the point, the video is clealy as ashg said..used to illicit an emotional reaction with anecdotal evidence which is the weakest form....which anyone with half a brain knows..yet yall are so hyped up to discredit anything that goes against the vaccine its almost comical...your giving attention to something and doesn't deserve it...
 
Nope, maybe try reading before commenting
If they can’t prove they really had a PhD how can they prove that answers were intentionally misleading to throw off the survey? Now fact checkers can get into the minds of people they don’t know via a Facebook survey? And what’s the point of saying that medical doctors weren’t included in the PhD category? No ****, an M.D. and a PhD aren’t the same thing so of course they wouldn’t be included in there. However, there could be M.D’s in the “professional category” given that that’s exactly what a medical degree confers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
So you share shat you disagree with it? That's strange.
I already said earlier it don't believe it proves anything. Obviously its take the level of tweets of so and so was antivax and now they died...its a emotional piece as ashg said..i haven't seen concrete evidence on Obama, or pizza gate..as for the election i believe whe tbe security officer of the voting machine used in the election openly tweets negatively about a candidate then it need auditing b we because the security officer has access to the machine and software...until info is released and able to be verified...its all conjecture...
So before spouting off..maybe ask some questions and you come and such an ass
 

VN Store



Back
Top