Vaccine or not?

#9,378
#9,378
  • Like
Reactions: SlingBlayde
#9,380
#9,380
SpaceCoastVol said:
That's EXACTLY how I feel about the 'vaccines'.
Click to expand...
Which absolutely is your right and honestly how you should operate. Do the research and make an informed decision for yourself. Others opinion can be weighed in the decision making process but ultimately decide what consequences you can live with and move on.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary, deezvols and VolinWayne
#9,383
#9,383
[QUOTE="VolinWayne, post: 20229734, member: 54059"][MEDIA=telegram]theprofessorsrecord/2584[/MEDIA] [URL='https://openvaers.com/covid-data']COVID Vaccine Data[/URL][/QUOTE] In b4 VAERS isnt reliable..BS from out left comments
 
#9,384
#9,384
Orangeslice13 said:
At our age it’s time to add Metamucil. It will help with that.

It’s good to see you posting. Hope you’re doing well
Click to expand...
Actually, a good diet is a better option. Eat lots of greens... I actually eat a few dried prunes every morning for breakfast. Have no problems. If you are a meat and taters only kind of guy, you gonna grunt for your morning constitutional.... guaranteed. THAT is science.
 
  • Like
Reactions: InVOLuntary and Orangeslice13
#9,385
#9,385
SpaceCoastVol said:
Actually, a good diet is a better option. Eat lots of greens... I actually eat a few dried prunes every morning for breakfast. Have no problems. If you are a meat and taters only kind of guy, you gonna grunt for your morning constitutional.... guaranteed. THAT is science.
Click to expand...

4 big glasses of water a day , one bowl of oatmeal with some type of fruit . Problem solved . Went through this with my dad and his meds for Parkinson’s.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
#9,387
#9,387
Orangeslice13 said:
I’m sure these “Dr and countries” have clinical studies that prove their statements and there’s nothing else in play that might be giving them their results…..like antibody therapy
Click to expand...
It's all very ironic. Vaccine pushes came long before the testing was there. Bug push to use them. Something else that is prescribed by an actual doctor, bug push to not use it.

Nothing funny about it at all.

Heck even the vaccine has seen the politics of it change. Pre 1/20/21 vaccine bad and not to be trusted. Post 1/20/21vaccine is good.

I wonder what study came out of which medical institution that changed peoples opinions on the matter on that day?
 
#9,388
#9,388
LouderVol said:
It's all very ironic. Vaccine pushes came long before the testing was there. Bug push to use them. Something else that is prescribed by an actual doctor, bug push to not use it.

Nothing funny about it at all.

Heck even the vaccine has seen the politics of it change. Pre 1/20/21 vaccine bad and not to be trusted. Post 1/20/21vaccine is good.

I wonder what study came out of which medical institution that changed peoples opinions on the matter on that day?
Click to expand...

your goalposts are all over the place.
Nothing you posted is in anyway relevant to me.
I can read a study for myself and make a decision for myself.
I’m ok if you’re doing the same. Actually I really don’t care if you’re not. It’s your life.
Edit: I will continue to point out false information though
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolsAgainstTheWorld15 and MAD
#9,389
#9,389
There has been much debate over how to get the unvaccinated to get their jabs — shame them, bribe them persuade them, or treat them as victims of mis- and disinformation campaigns — but who, exactly, are these people?

Most of the coverage would have you believe that the surge in cases is primarily down to less educated, ‘brainwashed’ Trump supporters who don’t want to take the vaccine. This may be partially true: the areas in which the delta variant is surging coincide with the sections of red America in which vaccination rates are lowest.

But according to a new paper by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh, this does not paint the full picture. The researchers analysed more than 5 million survey responses by a range of different demographic details, and classed those people who would “probably” or “definitely” not choose to get vaccinated as “vaccine hesitant.”


The most vaccine-hesitant group of all? PhDs
 
#9,390
#9,390
VolinWayne said:
There has been much debate over how to get the unvaccinated to get their jabs — shame them, bribe them persuade them, or treat them as victims of mis- and disinformation campaigns — but who, exactly, are these people?

Most of the coverage would have you believe that the surge in cases is primarily down to less educated, ‘brainwashed’ Trump supporters who don’t want to take the vaccine. This may be partially true: the areas in which the delta variant is surging coincide with the sections of red America in which vaccination rates are lowest.

But according to a new paper by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh, this does not paint the full picture. The researchers analysed more than 5 million survey responses by a range of different demographic details, and classed those people who would “probably” or “definitely” not choose to get vaccinated as “vaccine hesitant.”


The most vaccine-hesitant group of all? PhDs
Click to expand...
So the group most hesitant is a group of people trained to interpret and conduct research? Interesting.
 
#9,392
#9,392
VolinWayne said:
There has been much debate over how to get the unvaccinated to get their jabs — shame them, bribe them persuade them, or treat them as victims of mis- and disinformation campaigns — but who, exactly, are these people?

Most of the coverage would have you believe that the surge in cases is primarily down to less educated, ‘brainwashed’ Trump supporters who don’t want to take the vaccine. This may be partially true: the areas in which the delta variant is surging coincide with the sections of red America in which vaccination rates are lowest.

But according to a new paper by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh, this does not paint the full picture. The researchers analysed more than 5 million survey responses by a range of different demographic details, and classed those people who would “probably” or “definitely” not choose to get vaccinated as “vaccine hesitant.”


The most vaccine-hesitant group of all? PhDs
Click to expand...
Fact check: Setting the record straight on claims about vaccine hesitancy among Ph.D.s | CBS 17

THE FACTS: Researchers Robin Mejia at Carnegie-Mellon University and Wendy C. King of the University of Pittsburgh based their study of vaccine hesitancy rates off of results from a Facebook Data for Good survey, reviewing about 1 million responses each month between January and May and analyzing it by race, education, region and support of former President Donald Trump.
They found 23.9 percent of the people who said they hold Ph.D. degrees expressed hesitancy, the highest rate among the various levels of education.

But some of their work appears to be misrepresented online, missing the overall point that hesitancy dropped.

“There are people that can kind of take a data point and twist it around to mean something that it doesn’t mean, and that’s unfortunate,” King said.

A sensitivity analysis found some people answered in the extreme ends of some demographic categories to throw off some of the numbers. King said it appeared to be a “concerted effort” that “did make the hesitancy prevalence in the Ph.D. group look higher than it really is.”

For example, they observed higher hesitancy rates than expected in the oldest age group — 75 and over — as well as the top end in terms of education level.

“We found that people basically used it to write in political … statements,” King said. “So they weren’t genuine responses. They didn’t really complete the survey in good faith.”

There were some other issues.

The study hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet.

People taking the survey were on the honor system, with no way to make sure people who claimed to have Ph.D. degrees actually have them.

And the Ph.D. group does not include medical doctors or nurses.

“So it’s not representative of the medical profession,” King said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#9,393
#9,393
mad4vols said:
Fact check: Setting the record straight on claims about vaccine hesitancy among Ph.D.s | CBS 17

THE FACTS: Researchers Robin Mejia at Carnegie-Mellon University and Wendy C. King of the University of Pittsburgh based their study of vaccine hesitancy rates off of results from a Facebook Data for Good survey, reviewing about 1 million responses each month between January and May and analyzing it by race, education, region and support of former President Donald Trump.
They found 23.9 percent of the people who said they hold Ph.D. degrees expressed hesitancy, the highest rate among the various levels of education.

But some of their work appears to be misrepresented online, missing the overall point that hesitancy dropped.

“There are people that can kind of take a data point and twist it around to mean something that it doesn’t mean, and that’s unfortunate,” King said.

A sensitivity analysis found some people answered in the extreme ends of some demographic categories to throw off some of the numbers. King said it appeared to be a “concerted effort” that “did make the hesitancy prevalence in the Ph.D. group look higher than it really is.”

For example, they observed higher hesitancy rates than expected in the oldest age group — 75 and over — as well as the top end in terms of education level.

“We found that people basically used it to write in political … statements,” King said. “So they weren’t genuine responses. They didn’t really complete the survey in good faith.”

There were some other issues.

The study hasn’t been peer-reviewed yet.

People taking the survey were on the honor system, with no way to make sure people who claimed to have Ph.D. degrees actually have them.

And the Ph.D. group does not include medical doctors or nurses.

“So it’s not representative of the medical profession,” King said.
Click to expand...
So they ran a survey, it didn't show what they thought it would so they are questionsing thier own survey. Lol
 
#9,396
#9,396
Starting on Monday, New York City will ban 40% of their residents and 70% of their black residents from participating in indoor dining, indoor fitness, and indoor entertainment.

Unfortunately, these residents did not want to take an experimental mRNA gene therapy with an unknown long term safety profile.

Perhaps, these residents didn't trust our health institutions compromised by the billions being made every month by their big pharma sponsors.

Or, maybe, they understood that the so called "vaccine" does not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death.

Some may have even seen the record number of adverse advents and deaths be ignored by the corporate media.

Others may have weighed the risk-to-reward of a virus with a 99.98% chance of survival for people below the age of 50.

Many may have already developed robust natural immunity.

Regardless, they all will be banished from public society in New York City starting on Monday.

Segregation is back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pacer92, NorthDallas40, davethevol and 3 others
#9,397
#9,397
VolinWayne said:
Starting on Monday, New York City will ban 40% of their residents and 70% of their black residents from participating in indoor dining, indoor fitness, and indoor entertainment.

Unfortunately, these residents did not want to take an experimental mRNA gene therapy with an unknown long term safety profile.

Perhaps, these residents didn't trust our health institutions compromised by the billions being made every month by their big pharma sponsors.

Or, maybe, they understood that the so called "vaccine" does not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death.

Some may have even seen the record number of adverse advents and deaths be ignored by the corporate media.

Others may have weighed the risk-to-reward of a virus with a 99.98% chance of survival for people below the age of 50.

Many may have already developed robust natural immunity.

Regardless, they all will be banished from public society in New York City starting on Monday.

Segregation is back.
Click to expand...
So many lies in this statement, but 👍
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#9,398
#9,398
VolinWayne said:
Starting on Monday, New York City will ban 40% of their residents and 70% of their black residents from participating in indoor dining, indoor fitness, and indoor entertainment.

Unfortunately, these residents did not want to take an experimental mRNA gene therapy with an unknown long term safety profile.

Perhaps, these residents didn't trust our health institutions compromised by the billions being made every month by their big pharma sponsors.

Or, maybe, they understood that the so called "vaccine" does not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death.

Some may have even seen the record number of adverse advents and deaths be ignored by the corporate media.

Others may have weighed the risk-to-reward of a virus with a 99.98% chance of survival for people below the age of 50.

Many may have already developed robust natural immunity.

Regardless, they all will be banished from public society in New York City starting on Monday.

Segregation is back.
Click to expand...

Rasputin tried the "gene therapy" argument, which falls completely apart with literal seconds of Googling. This is National Enquirer-level tabloid garbage
 
  • Like
Reactions: ohhbother
#9,400
#9,400
NashVol11 said:
Rasputin tried the "gene therapy" argument, which falls completely apart with literal seconds of Googling. This is National Enquirer-level tabloid garbage
Click to expand...


I wasn't discussing gene therapy in this post. I was simply pointing out that segregation is back and the sheep are clueless.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top