NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,198
- Likes
- 83,312
So more adverse affects than people that have died from the virus? And as we know, that 700k number is inflated.New VAERS numbers have been published.
818,042 Adverse Events
127,641 Doctor Visits
83,412 Hospitalizations
92,017 Urgent Care
26,199 Disabled
10,179 Bell's Palsy
10,304 Myocarditis
8,408 Heart Attacks
2,631 Miscarriages
17,128 Deaths
100% Safe And Effective
COVID Vaccine Data
Honestly statistically today it is pretty safe. But it’s still a personal choice. That’s all.New VAERS numbers have been published.
818,042 Adverse Events
127,641 Doctor Visits
83,412 Hospitalizations
92,017 Urgent Care
26,199 Disabled
10,179 Bell's Palsy
10,304 Myocarditis
8,408 Heart Attacks
2,631 Miscarriages
17,128 Deaths
100% Safe And Effective
COVID Vaccine Data
Jacobson v. Massachusetts is a case which has withstood many challenges over the course of the last 116 years. If memory serves, Plessy v. Ferguson was from 1896 and Brown v. Board of Education was from 1954. It's already held up literally twice as long.Courts get it wrong all the time.
Dred Scott, Plessy v Ferguson, Kelo v. City of New London...
So has US v Miller. It’s still unconstitutional as far as I’m concernedJacobson v. Massachusetts is a case which has withstood many challenges over the course of the last 116 years. If memory serves, Plessy v. Ferguson was from 1896 and Brown v. Board of Education was from 1954. It's already held up literally twice as long.
Lulz you’re such an unintelligent state shill. Yes the statistics today don’t show a major risk. Today. Likewise the risk of adverse results from the disease is similarly low. Now dance and reconcile that. Ready … GO!OMG! Did you just post something factual, which wasn't from the MAGA, redneck narrative? Impressive. You must be turning over a new leaf. Good for you.
Everything you posted is totally irrelevant to my response. That's really no surprise. My response was to say that vaccinated people can get and specifically spread covid.Fully vaccinated people with a vaccine breakthrough infection are less likely to develop serious illness than those who are unvaccinated and get COVID-19. Even when fully vaccinated people develop symptoms, they tend to be less severe symptoms than in unvaccinated people. This means they are much less likely to be hospitalized or die than people who are not vaccinated.
A common reason I see used for remaining unvaccinated is :
"You can still contract COVID-19 when you are fully vaccinated."
That isn't a good reason. There really isn't a good reason for an adult to remain unvaccinated, especially if you are over 70 years old.
This will be my last response to you on the subject as I'm not wasting my time on an irrational motion. In a conversation, responses should make sense related to statements made. Yours didn't make any sense at all.My response to that was highly relevant.
It was, basically :
"So what? You are still better off being vaccinated."
Does anyone understand the distinction between Comirnaty and the Pfizer vaccine available in the U.S.? Is there actually a legal difference that might prevent recourse against Pfizer in the case of adverse events?
I have looked and cannot determine a conclusive answer to this question that was posed by a parent.
Since we are in a pseudo-fascist country at this point, I would say it is mainly from corporate suits involved and sending down the mandate to all of the pharmacists. But who knows if the govt isn't pressuring these corporations/drug stores to not fill them.Have the feds started threatening pharmacists with their licenses for filling Ivermectin scripts.
Were the words too big? Or do you struggle to read sentences that are without an accompaniment of color pictures?This will be my last response to you on the subject as I'm not wasting my time on an irrational motion. In a conversation, responses should make sense related to statements made. Yours didn't make any sense at all.
Hey @BowlBrother85 so you liked this post. But you only quoted one part. Which is fine for the back and forth however since you liked it im curious. Do you agree it should be a matter of personal choice on whether somebody chooses to get the jab or not?Honestly statistically today it is pretty safe. But it’s still a personal choice. That’s all.
Which is exactly where the power lies. The federal executive branch has little to no direct control over individual citizens. The Governor of the state they reside in however…So you agree that individual states hold the rights to require vaccinations and the federal government does not have that right.