Vaccine or not?

New VAERS numbers have been published.

818,042 Adverse Events
127,641 Doctor Visits
83,412 Hospitalizations
92,017 Urgent Care
26,199 Disabled
10,179 Bell's Palsy
10,304 Myocarditis
8,408 Heart Attacks
2,631 Miscarriages
17,128 Deaths

100% Safe And Effective


COVID Vaccine Data
So more adverse affects than people that have died from the virus? And as we know, that 700k number is inflated.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolinWayne
New VAERS numbers have been published.

818,042 Adverse Events
127,641 Doctor Visits
83,412 Hospitalizations
92,017 Urgent Care
26,199 Disabled
10,179 Bell's Palsy
10,304 Myocarditis
8,408 Heart Attacks
2,631 Miscarriages
17,128 Deaths

100% Safe And Effective


COVID Vaccine Data
Honestly statistically today it is pretty safe. But it’s still a personal choice. That’s all.
 
Courts get it wrong all the time.

Dred Scott, Plessy v Ferguson, Kelo v. City of New London...
Jacobson v. Massachusetts is a case which has withstood many challenges over the course of the last 116 years. If memory serves, Plessy v. Ferguson was from 1896 and Brown v. Board of Education was from 1954. It's already held up literally twice as long.
 
Jacobson v. Massachusetts is a case which has withstood many challenges over the course of the last 116 years. If memory serves, Plessy v. Ferguson was from 1896 and Brown v. Board of Education was from 1954. It's already held up literally twice as long.
So has US v Miller. It’s still unconstitutional as far as I’m concerned
 
OMG! Did you just post something factual, which wasn't from the MAGA, redneck narrative? Impressive. You must be turning over a new leaf. Good for you.
Lulz you’re such an unintelligent state shill. Yes the statistics today don’t show a major risk. Today. Likewise the risk of adverse results from the disease is similarly low. Now dance and reconcile that. Ready … GO! 🤡
 
Fully vaccinated people with a vaccine breakthrough infection are less likely to develop serious illness than those who are unvaccinated and get COVID-19. Even when fully vaccinated people develop symptoms, they tend to be less severe symptoms than in unvaccinated people. This means they are much less likely to be hospitalized or die than people who are not vaccinated.

A common reason I see used for remaining unvaccinated is :

"You can still contract COVID-19 when you are fully vaccinated."

That isn't a good reason. There really isn't a good reason for an adult to remain unvaccinated, especially if you are over 70 years old.
Everything you posted is totally irrelevant to my response. That's really no surprise. My response was to say that vaccinated people can get and specifically spread covid.
 
Everything you posted is totally irrelevant to my response. That's really no surprise. My response was to say that vaccinated people can get and specifically spread covid.
My response to that was highly relevant.

It was, basically :

"So what? You are still better off being vaccinated."
 
My response to that was highly relevant.

It was, basically :

"So what? You are still better off being vaccinated."
This will be my last response to you on the subject as I'm not wasting my time on an irrational motion. In a conversation, responses should make sense related to statements made. Yours didn't make any sense at all.
 
Does anyone understand the distinction between Comirnaty and the Pfizer vaccine available in the U.S.? Is there actually a legal difference that might prevent recourse against Pfizer in the case of adverse events?

I have looked and cannot determine a conclusive answer to this question that was posed by a parent.

I haven’t seen much of anything beyond the name change and I think under normal FDA approval protocols the liability protection should get removed. That last bit makes me wonder if that’s why they’re pushing so hard now for folks to get the shots.
 
Have the feds started threatening pharmacists with their licenses for filling Ivermectin scripts. 🤔
Since we are in a pseudo-fascist country at this point, I would say it is mainly from corporate suits involved and sending down the mandate to all of the pharmacists. But who knows if the govt isn't pressuring these corporations/drug stores to not fill them.

I've known about this being a problem since mid-August, so it isn't necessarily a "new" phenomenon.
 
This will be my last response to you on the subject as I'm not wasting my time on an irrational motion. In a conversation, responses should make sense related to statements made. Yours didn't make any sense at all.
Were the words too big? Or do you struggle to read sentences that are without an accompaniment of color pictures?
 
Honestly statistically today it is pretty safe. But it’s still a personal choice. That’s all.
Hey @BowlBrother85 so you liked this post. But you only quoted one part. Which is fine for the back and forth however since you liked it im curious. Do you agree it should be a matter of personal choice on whether somebody chooses to get the jab or not?
 
So you agree that individual states hold the rights to require vaccinations and the federal government does not have that right.
Which is exactly where the power lies. The federal executive branch has little to no direct control over individual citizens. The Governor of the state they reside in however…

And that explains why they pulled this OSHA BS as they fall under the executive branch.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DynaLo

VN Store



Back
Top