DuckInAPen
Vol Insider
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2017
- Messages
- 2,113
- Likes
- 5,345
What's happening in England tells me this thing isn't over. Another wave coming in two months. That's the way this has worked for 18 months. I am not advocating for more shots. Simply stating I don't believe it to be over.The sonofabitches just won’t go the hell away. Need more jab profits even though this damn thing is over.
Pfizer asks for FDA authorization for booster for everyone 18 and up
Until Ford stepped in, they weren't going to let private businesses decide if people had to wear masks in their private establishments. Legislature is pandering.And letting companies run amock results in the same lack of liberties and total oppression promised by socialism and communism- just under a different group.
I'm not completely wrong. What is the end result of regulatory capture? And is not forcing people to do things like get health insurance or pay a "tax" effectively the same thing? You're even posting this in a thread where it's continually shown your own government is attempting to force you to patronize one of a small handful of pharmaceutical companies (ps: you've already paid those companies).Nope, you are completely wrong. Not 1 single person in this country is forced to work for or patronize a business.
It's not a talking point. It's an issue that forever needs to be remembered. Don't allow only one voice to drive that narrative in emergency situations. Don't allow one person to become the face if they aren't the leader. It's that simple.Ahh, But Trump.
Get a better talking point.
So no not completely. Let’s take my case for example. My skills are tuned to a specific market segment, the defense market. What makes me worth the 35 years of experience is a position within the defense sector. The idiot in chiefs mandate locks me out if that sector if it’s upheld unless I’m willing to inject something in my body that I may not want there. Now I’m free to get a job in the private sector but my earnings are greatly diminished. As my skills aren’t tuned for that market. So yes quite a few highly skilled people are in fact forced to patronize a business or group of businesses or have the income generation capacity highly diminished due to a ridiculous over reaching mandate. That’s complete ********.Nope, you are completely wrong. Not 1 single person in this country is forced to work for or patronize a business.
I'm not completely wrong. What is the end result of regulatory capture? And is not forcing people to do things like get health insurance or pay a "tax" norm effectively the same thing? you're even posting this in a thread where it's continually a own your own government is attempting to force you to patronize one of a small handful of pharmaceutical companies (ps: you've already paid those companies).
The stupid semantics game from lolbertarians in the right wing is why companies all around literally own the politicians here.
It's not a talking point. It's an issue that forever needs to be remembered. Don't allow only one voice to drive that narrative in emergency situations. Don't allow one person to become the face if they aren't the leader. It's that simple.
Biden and Trump can both have handled this like ****. And it's ok to admit that. Plus his decision is still impacting us.
Fauci has been at the forefront of all these big time issues. He didn’t go crazy over Ebola and many other potential and actual pandemics. He’s doing his job. The attacks on him are stupid and baseless. If you think his goal is to damage Trump the you are a moron. Period. End of discussion.
So no not completely. Let’s take my case for example. My skills are tuned to a specific market segment, the defense market. What makes me worth the 35 years of experience is a position within the defense sector. The idiot in chiefs mandate locks me out if that sector if it’s upheld unless I’m willing to inject something in my body that I may not want there. Now I’m free to get a job in the private sector but my earnings are greatly diminished. As my skills aren’t tuned for that market. So yes quite a few highly skilled people are in fact forced to patronize a business or group of businesses or have the income generation capacity highly diminished due to a ridiculous over reaching mandate. That’s complete ********.
My opinion of him has changed greatly. Would you like me to go back and repost all the lies from the internet you fell for? And the second part of my statement is true. He wasn't out to attack or hurt trump. He's just myopic and that makes him dangerous. He's also only concerned about one part of this pandemic. When multiple issues have to be consideredIs this your post Fauci sentiment?
I'm not completely wrong. What is the end result of regulatory capture? And is not forcing people to do things like get health insurance or pay a "tax" norm effectively the same thing? you're even posting this in a thread where it's continually a own your own government is attempting to force you to patronize one of a small handful of pharmaceutical companies (ps: you've already paid those companies).
The stupid semantics game from lolbertarians in the right wing is why companies all around literally own the politicians here.
It's not a talking point. It's an issue that forever needs to be remembered. Don't allow only one voice to drive that narrative in emergency situations. Don't allow one person to become the face if they aren't the leader. It's that simple.
Biden and Trump can both have handled this like ****. And it's ok to admit that. Plus his decision is still impacting us.
Yep. You called me out similarly on that crap Powell was doing and I posted my revised opinion. I still boggle at how attorney ethics and character apparently have a price tag on them. Not a profession I’m equipped for.My opinion of him has changed greatly. Would you like me to go back and repost all the lies from the internet you fell for? And the second part of my statement is true. He wasn't out to attack or hurt trump. He's just myopic and that makes him dangerous.