Vaccine or not?

And no federal funds. Can't wait to see the Oklahoma ANG buying its own tanks and helicopters. Not exactly a low tax move. But of course you can't sell any American made military equipment without DOD permission. Wonder what the Russians will sell them.
the Okies can buy it cheap from what the xiden team left in Afghanistan.
 
Last edited:
So they are saying it alters DNA function. Funny I could have sworn there was a National “get out the truth” that mRNA therapy in no way altered dna by science foundations and the msm.
So most of us are all getting DNA altered one way or the other through the covid spike or mRNA spike. Yay 🎊
 
The spike protein is present in both virus and mRNA vaccine. My uneducated guess is that the vaccine would probably cause a higher production of spike proteins.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronaviru...&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
I’ve found this explanation which is about the only explanation I’ve found between the differences of the mRNA spike vs COVID spike. So if true and the mRNA spike doesn’t bind to organ cells, it still doesn’t matter that much because the jabs don’t really protect you from catching covid all that well.
 
https://www.reddit.com/r/Coronaviru...&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf&context=3
I’ve found this explanation which is about the only explanation I’ve found between the differences of the mRNA spike vs COVID spike. So if true and the mRNA spike doesn’t bind to organ cells, it still doesn’t matter that much because the jabs don’t really protect you from catching covid all that well.
If it doesn't circulate and it doesn't bind, what is causing myocarditis?
 
If it doesn't circulate and it doesn't bind, what is causing myocarditis?
I'm no doctor but I was about to ask the same thing. I'm fairly certain they've found it binding to cells in women's reproductive systems, too, which is why there are so many reports of messed up cycles. Also, note the NEJM study where they deliberately and massively misrepresented the numbers in their study on miscarriages (the media ran with the original numbers and did not update their stories despite the NEJM themselves adjusting their findings based on their own data).
 
I'm no doctor but I was about to ask the same thing. I'm fairly certain they've found it binding to cells in women's reproductive systems, too, which is why there are so many reports of messed up cycles. Also, note the NEJM study where they deliberately and massively misrepresented the numbers in their study on miscarriages (the media ran with the original numbers and did not update their stories despite the NEJM themselves adjusting their findings based on their own data).
Another good example. There is a multi-center investigation underway into the effects on the menstrual cycle.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
@kiddiedoc have you heard anything about hospitals getting Medicare funding cut if they don’t get employees vaccine compliant?

Just curious how these facilities are going to react if this is in fact true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: marcusluvsvols
I love it. The FOIA request wanted the documents processed in the same time the Pfizer license review took 108 days. FDA is saying they dont have the manpower to process in that timeline, nor does the redaction group of 10 (for the entire government).

Apparently the FDAs own rules require licensed product data to be immediately available. That's kinda the point of licensing.
 
I love it. The FOIA request wanted the documents processed in the same time the Pfizer license review took 108 days. FDA is saying they dont have the manpower to process in that timeline, nor does the redaction group of 10 (for the entire government).

Apparently the FDAs own rules require licensed product data to be immediately available. That's kinda the point of licensing.
I know I am quoting myself. But I love what they are saying. They will only spend 108 days reviewing data for safety of the end user, but they will take 55 years to cover their, and Biontech's arse.
 
The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data

Anybody else here not at all surprised that the government wants to keep this info hidden?

It’s sure looks like they want to wait out the life span of those folks that got the jabs. Now ask yourself why?
 
The FDA has asked a federal judge to make the public wait until the year 2076 to disclose all of the data and information it relied upon to license Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine. That is not a typo. It wants 55 years to produce this information to the public.

FDA Asks Federal Judge to Grant it Until the Year 2076 to Fully Release Pfizer’s COVID-19 Vaccine Data
This right here is all I need to know about this ****. No way in Hell am I getting this 'vaccine' now. When the government is indemnifying the company producing it, and hiding any and all data on it... and FORCING people to get it. Nuh uh. **** 'em. They can jab it in my cold dead arm.
 

VN Store



Back
Top