ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 20,423
- Likes
- 40,430
Are we willing to change the acceptable side effect threshold for all or part of the approval process? What would the new recommendation be: 0.75%? 0.5%? Would that change be retroactive to all currently approved vaccines and medications?
I believe most people are willing to accept a small chance for potential side effects to any medication. There are warnings on a bottle of ibuprofen. We are always making some risk
assessment when we take a medication: We trading some level of risk for the potential of some level of benefit.
I believe most people who have issues with the vaccines because both of those are unknown. And yet many people are having their arms twisted to accept the unknown risk for the unknown benefit. Maybe we’ll know more in a year or two…like if the vaccines went through their normal trials.
I think it’s a huge issue. Some people believe the unknown risk is worth the currently estimated benefit. That’s great…get the vaccine.
Others want to sit it out and wait until more is known. Those people should not be punished.
This is 100% it. It is a risk assessment. I know fairly well what my risk is from getting COVID based on almost two years of data. I do not know very well what my risks are from the vaccine- though I have a lot of concerns based on what I am seeing happen to other people in my age group. To me, it looks a lot like the risk of getting the vaccine far outweighs the risk I'd have from the actual illness (even if all the overall risks are fairly small). Then when you factor in that I am not saving anyone's life if I do get it (as I could still spread the illness, despite what all the initial propaganda tried to push) it makes literally zero sense for me to get it.I believe most people are willing to accept a small chance for potential side effects to any medication. There are warnings on a bottle of ibuprofen. We are always making some risk
assessment when we take a medication: We trading some level of risk for the potential of some level of benefit.
I believe most people who have issues with the vaccines because both of those are unknown. And yet many people are having their arms twisted to accept the unknown risk for the unknown benefit. Maybe we’ll know more in a year or two…like if the vaccines went through their normal trials.
I think it’s a huge issue. Some people believe the unknown risk is worth the currently estimated benefit. That’s great…get the vaccine.
Others want to sit it out and wait until more is known. Those people should not be punished.
You people are not smart enough for that. You have to let the bureaucrats make the decision for you.This is 100% it. It is a risk assessment. I know fairly well what my risk is from getting COVID based on almost two years of data. I do not know very well what my risks are from the vaccine- though I have a lot of concerns based on what I am seeing happen to other people in my age group. To me, it looks a lot like the risk of getting the vaccine far outweighs the risk I'd have from the actual illness (even if all the overall risks are fairly small). Then when you factor in that I am not saving anyone's life if I do get it (as I could still spread the illness, despite what all the initial propaganda tried to push) it makes literally zero sense for me to get it.
The issue is that p value is already higher than what got pulled previously.I agree with you. It should be an individual's choice.
I have made my position known previously regarding the current veracity of VAERS. Even if every single adverse reaction logged were legitimate (including divorce, lost poker games, sudden onset baldness), we're still looking at a reaction threshold much lower than 1%. Double what's in VAERS and we're still below 1%.
I know what it's like to be a medical statistic. It's not fun. But the p value threshold still holds.
They going to make them use their own water fountain and eat their meals out back? I’ve seen this before somewhere.Supermarket Giant Strips Unvaccinated Employees Of Their Benefits
Supermarket chain Kroger announced Tuesday it will eliminate paid emergency leave for unvaccinated employees who contract COVID-19 in addition to requiring some of them to pay a monthly $50 health insurance surcharge starting in 2022, according to a company memo.
The country’s largest supermarket chain, which employees roughly 465,000 workers, issued an internal company memo announcing the changes, which will start on Jan. 1, a company spokesperson told the Daily Caller News Foundation. Kroger is tightening their COVID-19 related policies as U.S. businesses face uncertainty over President Joe Biden’s recent federal vaccination mandate.
I'm sorry but the unvaccinated do not care.
MN hospitals: ‘We’re heartbroken. We’re overwhelmed.’ – Twin Cities
View attachment 420498
I tRuSt mY imMuNe sYsTem.
As COVID patients pack Colorado hospitals, anger grows against the unvaccinated