Vaccine or not?

He selectively cites studies that support his claim without addressing the other studies that provide critical rebuttal and differing data.

It is possible for a study to be true and yet not paint the whole picture. That's why meta analysis exist.

And I have seen studies (aka Johns Hopkins supporting use of hydroxichloriquin) disappear from the internet. Something ain’t right.
 
I would never, ever take a salaried job again. Ever. The closest I get is if I have to be on call for a month. That means I get paid a certain amount whether I work a full schedule or if I don't turn a wheel. It sucks.

I wouldn’t either, I don’t do well working for wages.
 
Based on your expertise in evaluating the safety and effectiveness of vaccinations at what point will you accept the vaccine as being proven and tested? 5 years, 10 years, 50 years? What metric or criteria will you accept as being adequate?
How about after it has gone through the usual approval process?

And even then, I didn't get the flu vaccine so I likely wouldn't get these even if they were optional instead of mandatory.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VolStrom
My money is on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Guys like Reggie Lewis were doing this before it was cool.

These athletes, with notable careers, experienced sudden cardiac death by age 40.

That's scattered over a 40+ year period. We're looking at about half that number since the vaccines came out this year. That represents either a cluster or a coincidence.
 

VN Store



Back
Top