ButchPlz
We do a little trollin'
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2014
- Messages
- 20,420
- Likes
- 40,425
Why should I look it up when I can go to the source, the people who complain the jab doesn't do what it's supposed to do?The second foremost "public health authority" made the claim, which you were too lazy to look up for yourself. You're not even qualified to have an opinion on this stuff when you're totally missing on basic stuff. No wonder this country's run into the ground- we let the lowest information people actually act on their opinions here.
This level of head-in-sand absolutely and always deserves insults.
They even re-worked the definition of "vaccine" to fit this therapy underneath it. The CDC and at least one of the pharma companies also said that the shots would "100%" prevent severe illness. Fauci said they'd reduce your likelihood to spread COVID by more than 90% (I believe his quote said the vaccinated would be a "dead end" for COVID after the first two doses). Our friend here is willingly unaware of all this, though, but thinks he's entitled to hold his opinion above everyone else's.It’s not a vaccine. And it was advertised as exactly that early on. The shot that had been researched so much they didn’t even know there would be a booster schedule.
My opinion about the jab being beneficial, sure, because it is. My question was why so many think the jab was supposed to be foolproof. Like I said, it was never presented as foolproof when (edit - and where) I got my shots. So, CDC fell down on the job.And yet you continually have the absence of mind to share your opinion and argue when you are totally unaware of a basic piece of info like this?
You're a little man that can't even parse together basic information, yet you feel like you can assert an opinion.My opinion about the jab being beneficial, sure, because it is. My question was why so many think the jab was supposed to be foolproof. Like I said, it was never presented as foolproof when I got my shots. So CDC fell down on the job.
Of course I am. Because, sadly, low-info goobers impact my life every time they vote for, approve of, and go after others over things they clearly don't understand. You just happen to have proven yourself over and over to fall under that category. And the latest farce you've presented is the most hilarious one.You're the one lashing out. You should chill.
I hope that makes you feel better about yourself.Of course I am. Because, sadly, low-info goobers impact my life every time they vote for, approve of, and go after others over things they clearly don't understand. You just happen to have proven yourself over and over to fall under that category. And the latest farce you've presented is the most hilarious one.
My opinion about the jab being beneficial, sure, because it is. My question was why so many think the jab was supposed to be foolproof. Like I said, it was never presented as foolproof when I got my shots. So CDC fell down on the job.
I figured I'd ask those who say the vaccine's no good because it doesn't block all infections. I wonder why they expect it to, when as far as I know that's never been advertised by public health authorities.
It's a discussion board. Are you so immature you can't discuss anything without throwing insults?
LolNobody from the CDC or any other medical organization that should be reputable?
A lot of people believe that the shots are supposed to completely block the virus, and that masks are to protect the wearer. I'm curious why that is. I sounds like those responsible for spreading the word didn't do a good job.
Naw, my takes are good. They just don't always agree with the anti-vaxxer anti-mask crowd.
Exactly. I noticed too that he said "all" infection.Just getting caught up but I haven’t heard anyone say that any “ vaccine “ blocks all infections . I have heard a POTUS say that it’s the unvaxxed not the vaxxed that’s the problem , I’ve seen all kinds of false and misleading stats and information about this “ vaccine “ but not heard it stops all infections .
It’s funny the same libs that screech about big pharma and crony capitalism screwing the little guy, are so often the first to unconditionally promote the Vax. The cognitive dissonance is unrealCOVID vaccines are not meant to prevent all infections, experts say. Americans need to reset their expectations.
Gotta keep spinning it to get the drug companies their money.
What was there to discuss? It's a simple right or wrong situation, and you were very, very wrong (as usual).Hardly owned. Junior didn't want to discuss, just throw his own insults. Responding in kind, so what?
Haha, you are something. I asked questions. I made no implications. You apparently imagined some implications and got your panties in a wad. Anyway, my questions have been answered.What was there to discuss? It's a simple right or wrong situation, and you were very, very wrong (as usual).
You implied medical professionals didn't say what they said they did; I provided a direct quote, you continued implying that it wasn't from "healthcare professionals" because you're too lazy to do your own thinking. You were wrong. Now tell me what's left to discuss?
"Nobody from the CDC or any other medical organization that should be reputable?" isn't implying that one of your "real" healthcare professionals didn't make the quote? It's funny watching you get absolutely blasted in every single thread trying to weasel around your own words. You'd make a decent small town councilman trying to flex nuts all over before getting arrested for embezzling money or diddling a kid, I'll give you that.Haha, you are something. I asked questions. I made no implications. You apparently imagined some implications and got your panties in a wad. Anyway, my questions have been answered.