BigOrangeMojo
The Member in Miss December
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2017
- Messages
- 24,790
- Likes
- 58,175
Did this get posted here? This stuff is absolutely whack. When the bureaucrats are starting to cover their asses you know something's up.
https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/11/health/moderna-bivalent-transparency/index.html
Yep.You really are a terrible person.
Your fellow Death Celebrator already posted the sad news and was immediately shot down.
I know this is confusing since your last Eulogy was actually a year old and died from PCP.
Another clarification: there is no TB vaccine currently used in the U.S., and there is no vaccine for Group A Streptococcus, the causative agent for scarlet fever. So, not sure you can blame "anti-vaxxers."
To clarify: when and which particular vaccines were ever "mandated" for babies?
Typical Trumpine duck and cover reply.
Here’s my problem with ivermectin. It hasn’t been able to be proven effective Vs Covid in a clinical study. (That I’m aware of) I’ve said over and over that is safe with minimal downside so if a person wants to try it they should be allowed too but I’ve been attacked for simply pointing out that it has failed in studies.As soon as word got out that ivermectin was being used successfully in other nations and by some physicians in the U.S., there was an IMMEDIATE smear campaign against the inexpensive, safe medication which had already been shown to have antiviral properties.
For those (including some on this board) that got on board the "dangerous, horse paste" train: how do you feel when you read that piece? Are you not left with any questions? Could there be any motive to squash a cheap alternative to the mRNA shots and ridiculously-expensive (and ineffective) Remdesivir?
Political BS spin.FDA Failed to Present NEJM Study to Advisors Before Voting to Recommend Bivalent Boosters
The study showed more people became infected with the bivalent boosters (3.2%) than the people who received the original booster shot (1.9%).
The U.S. government spent $5B on these shots, which showed to be LESS efficacious than the previous COVID jabs.
FDA vaccine advisers 'disappointed' and 'angry' that early data about new Covid-19 booster shot wasn't presented for review last year | CNN
What in the world are you talking about? Are you really posting a CDC page in rebuttal? You do realize I am a physician, right?? Are you arguing that we vaccinate against TB in the US, or that there is a vaccine for scarlet fever? I'm confused.I know you are allergic to facts, but here it is. Proceed to ignore sources, as Trumpines prefer to do.
Tuberculosis (TB) - Questions and Answers About TB
BCG is a vaccine for TB. This vaccine is not widely used in the United States. Many people born outside of the United States have received the BCG TB vaccine.
It is often given to infants and small children in other countries where TB is more common. It protects children in those countries from getting severe forms of TB disease, such as TB meningitis. The BCG TB vaccine is not thought to protect people from getting TB disease in the lungs, which is the most common form of disease in the United States.
Here’s my problem with ivermectin. It hasn’t been able to be proven effective Vs Covid in a clinical study. (That I’m aware of) I’ve said over and over that is safe with minimal downside so if a person wants to try it they should be allowed too but I’ve been attacked for simply pointing out that it has failed in studies.
The most recent example
Ivermectin shown ineffective in treating COVID-19, according to multi-site study including KU Medical Center
Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19
Edit: it also has been proven to not be harmful so if you and your doctor are for it then it should be available
Yep.
I’ve never used the ignore feature. EL just continues to prove how disgusting and distasteful human beings can be. “Owning” the libs for us is a funny meme, or a “Let’s Go Brandon” campaign. In contrast, “owning maga” for her is celebrating someone’s death. It’s evil. Time to ignore it.
I got what you were saying brotherTo clarify: my point was not to comment on the efficacy of ivermectin (which some studies have actually demonstrated, but there is so much BS influence from pharma $$$, that I'm not sure I trust they are receiving appropriate attention). I was trying to elucidate the obvious narrative-pushing when every news outlet immediately branded it as "horse paste" and dangerous.
It's literally one of the most life- and disability- saving drugs on the planet, and one of the widest used, with a very good safety profile.
Here’s my problem with ivermectin. It hasn’t been able to be proven effective Vs Covid in a clinical study. (That I’m aware of) I’ve said over and over that is safe with minimal downside so if a person wants to try it they should be allowed too but I’ve been attacked for simply pointing out that it has failed in studies.
The most recent example
Ivermectin shown ineffective in treating COVID-19, according to multi-site study including KU Medical Center
Effect of Ivermectin vs Placebo on Time to Sustained Recovery in Outpatients With Mild to Moderate COVID-19
Edit: it also has been proven to not be harmful so if you and your doctor are for it then it should be available
Again, that’s a fair critique. I still have no problem with people taking it.This isn't the first "study" to say Ivermectin is ineffective. It seems to have similar flaws to the "Together Trial". The same randomized control trial where 58% of the placebo group dropped out vs only 9% of the ivermectin group. Yet, when comparing death rates, they used the full denominator for the placebo group as if 58% of the group didn't drop out and used the 9% reduced denominator for the ivermectin death rate. Not only that, but the ivermectin group was underdosed and only given a course for 3 days beginning 8 days after symptoms are present. 8 days after! How does this pass for good science? Further, they instructed the ivm group to take the medication on an empty stomach when it is known that ivm requires taking with a meal to cross the gut barrier. This wasn't a trial, it was a sham attempting to give the ivm deniers a "sciency" explanation for their outright refusal to acknowledge mountains of observational trials from all corners of the globe. Even then, this Together Trial accidentally proved that Ivermectin works wonderfully if you simply use the correct denominators. 3.5% death rate vs 8.5%
Granted, the "Together Trial" was also gaging effectiveness vs the much more deadly variants like "Delta" and the original variant, where this new study seems like it was in the timeline of Omicron. Ivermectin may very well have lost any effectiveness against the much more benign variants, but so have the vaccines. The cost/benefit of the most recent variants makes it a no-brainer to eschew the vaccine, and in lieu of taking them, take something that is proven safe and harmless that may still have some effect, like Ivermectin.
Again, that’s a fair critique. I still have no problem with people taking it.
I’ve never argued against people taking it.
However if we’re going down the save and effective rabbit hole then the push, absolutely beyond any shadow of a doubt, should have been on the Vit C, Zinc, D3 cocktail. It absolutely prevents serious Covid infections…..it’s damn near completely effective vs any Covid infection. Nobody wants to do preventive care though…..unless it’s something like a mask or a lockdown that can be used for political purposes
To the bold: No doubt. The public health policy response to this virus was a complete unmitigated sh*t show. The amount of low hanging fruit we passed over while holding out for an untested miracle vaccine is mind boggling. Further, the way people were treated who tried to steer public health towards the low hanging fruit (even in the interim while vaccines were being developed) is a lesson to be remembered next time something like this happens.
There are studies that show a Serious increase in lung infections from micro plastics. From wearing a stupid ass mask.I would like to believe this to be the case. However, the continued advertising of booster shots during sporting events and the number of people still wearing cloth face diapers gives me pause.
I just saw a little girl because mom is worried that "she keeps getting sick" this year. CV, flu (twice), cold after cold....There are studies that show a Serious increase in lung infections from micro plastics. From wearing a stupid ass mask.
Don’t get me started on how many times a day a mask is supposed to be changed but we have people wearing the same one for weeks at a time.
Stupid
I also find it very interesting that ‘breakthrough cases are rare’ narrative was promoted for so long… nobody is really saying that anymore.. and once again, anecdotal evidence as I am not a professorSerious question. You don't think it's the least bit suspicious that the covid vaccines have blank inserts.
With each package of 'vaccines' the FDA and 42 USC 300aa requires that a package insert like this be included.
https://www.fda.gov/files/vaccines, blood & biologics/published/package-insert-recombivax-hb.pdf
Package inserts are intended to give the administrating healthcare professional the information they need in order to fulfill the legal requirements to achieve informed consent.
They include how to report to VAERS, contraindications, warnings, post marketing adverse events, cited research, dosage for age and weight, and important stuff like that, that is supposed to be available to every potential recipient.