BigPapaVol
Wave yo hands in the aiya
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2005
- Messages
- 63,225
- Likes
- 14
I absolutely hate the luck element of sports like Hockey and Soccer.
What? There's no more luck in either hockey or soccer than there is in American football.
Is in my mind. Soccer not as much as hockey, but the whole tipped puck, traffic in front of the goalie thing drives me nuts.
There would be no prayer, under any circumstances, for a team of decent 22 year old players to go out a beat a NFL football team. Our hockey team did that in 1980.
It has actually happened
College All-Star Game - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Is in my mind. Soccer not as much as hockey, but the whole tipped puck, traffic in front of the goalie thing drives me nuts.
There would be no prayer, under any circumstances, for a team of decent 22 year old players to go out a beat a NFL football team. Our hockey team did that in 1980.
Is in my mind. Soccer not as much as hockey, but the whole tipped puck, traffic in front of the goalie thing drives me nuts.
There would be no prayer, under any circumstances, for a team of decent 22 year old players to go out a beat a NFL football team. Our hockey team did that in 1980.
What? There's no more luck in either hockey or soccer than there is in American football.
Tipped pucks, traffic in front of the goalie, and the scramble in the crease is not luck. All that stuff happens on purpose. It's no more luck than somebody driving the lane in basketball and dishing it out to someone for an open shot.
Only because of the extreme physical nature of American football. 22 year olds aren't physically strong enough to handle NFL players. It's the only major team sport in the world in which that's the case. Football's the outlier, not hockey or soccer.
(And even thoroughly physically overmatched football teams can still get lucky on occasion -- cf. Appy State over Michigan.)
It's absolutely true of basketball as well.
I understad forechecking and traffic in front of the net, but the lucky bounce dictates play and makes heros of goalies. The never score nature of both games results in more fluke outcomes than any other sport.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
No way. You could put together a roster of 22-and-under American players who could beat a few NBA teams. Kevin Durant is 21. Derrick Rose is 21. Michael Beasley is 21. Tyreke Evans is 20. Etc. No, they wouldn't beat any NBA team with a commanding inside-presence guy, but it wouldn't be unthinkable that they could win a game against everybody else.
You call it a lucky bounce; I call it putting the puck in scoring position. It doesn't just bounce in the goal if the players haven't done a ton of work to put it in front of the net while there's somebody else down there to whack at it.
I can see why you might not like the low-scoring sports in an aesthetic sense. But it ain't just luck.
No on basketball. You're comparig apples and oranges. The best young hockey players were already professionals and not on the Oly team. The guys you mentioned would all be on the pro squad. It would be like taking current collegiate all stars and playing NBA all stars. Obliteration. The 80 olympics fluke wouldn't happen.
Posted via VolNation Mobile