Vice Presidential Debate 2020

[Y9 Vol]

Ya gotta give it to the flies. They recognize a good turd when they smell it

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Harris did well with women and mothers. Pence did well with old white guys.

So you're saying Biden doesn't even like her

 

[Matt2496]

lol

 

[ButchPlz]

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Well that’s what happens when you make a stupid commitment to pick a sex. Pick the best. Identity politics are absurdly stupid.

Well see in a few weeks. If blacks vote for Biden over their jobs, it will be because of race.

 

[Septic]

Usually because there are checks in place (ex. Senate, Supreme Court, in some cases States) to prevent this and other extremist agendas from coming to fruition, thankfully.

The Constitution is why they ain't takin yer gunz. All the chirping in both sides is nothing more than special interest and low information vote pandering; gunz ain't going anywhere - right, wrong or indifferent.

 

[C-south]

So would a Beijing Biden/Harris administration be for or against fracking?

Would a Beijing Biden/Harris administration keep or get rid of Trump's tax cuts?

Would a Beijing Biden/Harris administration be for or against packing the SC?

In 1864.......

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Biden to talk to voters directly as Trump skips Oct. 15 debate -campaign

I'm sure he'll get some tough questions.

 

[Septic]

View attachment 312606

Looks like he's showing how the two handed shocker works.

 

[SpaceCoastVol]

Pence has been putting shiny on Trump’s $hit for 3 1/2 years. He’s good at it. But you can’t make good $hit outta bad $hit

Same could be said about quoting yourself.

 

[volfanjustin]

I'm sure he'll get some tough questions.

More "undecided" voters?

 

[Arclight]

Another Dem media show. ZZZzzzz

 

[ButchPlz]

More "undecided" voters?

Did you see that one of those was an actor that was just used as a Democrat voter in another show?

Our leftist friends will sit and feast on a plate full of poop as long as it's from their team.

 

[volfanjustin]

Did you see that one of those was an actor that was just used as a Democrat voter in another show?

Our leftist friends will sit and feast on a plate full of poop as long as it's from their team.

I did. Yeap they hate Trump so much they don't have any issues with anything their side says or does.

 

[Wafflestomper]

Your narrative is wrong. The Republican Senate HAS been consistent and I’ve been pointing that out to you over and over and over...

You are screaming at their rationale. But their actions are consistent. Fact.

What you've been pointing out is that the government is in a unique position right now, but unequivocal statements were made by many republican senators in 2016 to the effect of "we should not be making a lifetime SCOTUS appointment in an election year" or "the American people should decide..." McConnell himself said things like this. I'll provide quotes if you like.

 

[C-south]

View attachment 312606

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[MontyPython]

Trump is out of the next debate

 

[Electric Orange]

 

[NorthDallas40]

What you've been pointing out is that the government is in a unique position right now, but unequivocal statements were made by many republican senators in 2016 to the effect of "we should not be making a lifetime SCOTUS appointment in an election year" or "the American people should decide..." McConnell himself said things like this. I'll provide quotes if you like.

And once again your attacking their rationale on not acting on the Garland nomination while ignoring the action of not nominating a justice in an election year with a non aligned Senate is somehow unique.

You are conflating that Garland not even getting a review and vote equates to the GOP must not act now. That narrative, for about the fifth time now, is not supported by our country’s history. Obama had a GOP Senate. Trump has a GOP Senate. Even Mittens and Alexander even pointed out this basic fact

 

[OHvol40]

Your narrative is wrong. The Republican Senate HAS been consistent and I’ve been pointing that out to you over and over and over...

You are screaming at their rationale. But their actions are consistent. Fact.

Lol

 

[Lloyd_Christmas]

And once again your attacking their rationale on not acting on the Garland nomination while ignoring the action of not nominating a justice in an election year with a non aligned Senate is somehow unique.

You are conflating that Garland not even getting a review and vote equates to the GOP must not act now. That narrative, for about the fifth time now, is not supported by our country’s history. Obama had a GOP Senate. Trump has a GOP Senate. Even Mittens and Alexander even pointed out this basic fact

Lincoln had a Republican led Senate and still held off on nominating a new justice until after he was reelected...so it has happened. Lincoln also had a 10th justice added and appointed 5 justices in four years, so there's also some history of packing the court. The GOP is being a bit hypocritical, but that's politics.

 

[utvolpj]

Lincoln had a Republican led Senate and still held off on nominating a new justice until after he was reelected...so it has happened. Lincoln also had a 10th justice added and appointed 5 justices in four years, so there's also some history of packing the court. The GOP is being a bit hypocritical, but that's politics.

When you're going back to civil way days for examples you've pretty much lost the upper hand

 

[NorthDallas40]

Lol

Thanks for the riveting reply. Now show where my statement is factually incorrect with regards to an election year nomination with a WH and Senate majority of the same party.

 

[Y9 Vol]

Lincoln had a Republican led Senate and still held off on nominating a new justice until after he was reelected...so it has happened. Lincoln also had a 10th justice added and appointed 5 justices in four years, so there's also some history of packing the court. The GOP is being a bit hypocritical, but that's politics.

Seriously?