VolsSportsFan
Where are the turtles?
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2008
- Messages
- 72,982
- Likes
- 46,035
Brady's team is depleted. Can't believe they are 4-0. I gotta respect him for that. It's easy to forgive a fumble like that, especially when they win. Remember when he threw a pick to lose against the Chargers, but the safety fumbled it instead of taking a knee? Yeah, things just seem to work out for Brady. The two exceptions are the improbable 2006 AFFCG comeback and the game a few years back where the Pats went for it on 4th and inches on their own 30 against the Colts.
They can quote all the stats they want to, the NFL historians will remember him as the greatest regular season QB ever and an average postseason one.
And if anyone believes otherwise, take off your orange colored glasses.
Do you guys also believe that Rocky Marciano is the greatest heavyweight ever?
LOL
Yeah, my opinion is all about emotion. I took the time -- I'm embarrassed to admit how much time -- to do the research and post the statistics and the factual information so that my opinion would NOT simply be dismissed as some sort of bias in favor of a former Vol. And then you guys conveniently dismiss my opinions anyway. You don't bother to do any work to gather facts and stats that support your views. You just parrot what you've heard other people say: Joe Montana is the best because he had some great playoff performances while playing for the dominant team of his era.
Okay, so what happens if Peyton wins another SB this year? I want to know where you guys stand. How about if he wins 2 more? This year and next? Then what will you say?
Well, I hate that I have to post so many stats. But honestly, how else are we supposed to quantify what these guys have done on the field?
You say, "His team aside..." as if you can separate a single player from a team when you're talking about wins and losses. With all due respect, I just do not think that is an intellectually defensible argument. Is football a team game? If you say yes, then you can't make an argument that starts by putting his team aside. Were Jeff Hostetler and Mark Rypien better QBs than Fran Tarkenton and Dan Marino? If I accept your premise, then there's only one possible answer. And that answer makes no sense.
I am old enough to have watched Joe Montana. I accept that he is one of the greatest QBs to ever play the game. But Peyton Manning is on a whole other level. Some day I believe this will be accepted by everyone as an incontrovertible fact. But we're not there yet. It took a lot of people some time before they let go of Rocky Marciano, too.
Peyton Manning is the Muhammad Ali of football. He will eventually win everyone over.
People act like Manning is an utter failure in the playoffs. He's won a SB. He's been to 2. He's overachieved in the regular season and it's actually hurt his public perception cause people expected the Colts to do better in the playoffs, when they probably shouldn't have.
Plug in any other QB and the Colts end up with 0 SB appearances, IMO.
Hacksaw, you saw we're "parroting" what others say; yes, what the prevailing thinking of people far more experienced and learned than you say. You can choose to disagree, that's your right, but stop acting like everyone is crazy to say Montana is the GOAT.
They're not crazy. They're just lazy. It's easy to look at Montana's SB wins and say he's the best based solely on that.
I think that most of them simply underestimate what a huge advantage it is for a QB to have a great OL that not only gives great pass protection, but also executes blocking schemes to near perfection, opening holes for running backs who not only contribute to raw offensive production (in the form of rushing yardage), but also make opposing defenses more vulnerable to the pass by forcing them to respect the run.
They seem to hugely undervalue the significance of a defense that held opposing teams to an average of 17 points less than the Colts defenses did in their playoff games with Peyton at QB. It's like, oh yeah...the 49'ers did have a great defense, but Joe! Oh, Joe!
Yes, Montana had great playoff performances. But he never had the pressure of feeling like it was all up to him to put the team on his shoulders. He never had to worry that if he didn't make it happen, it wasn't going to happen. That goes a looong way towards explaining how he was able to have some of those great performances. It's totally different when you don't have that great team around you. Joe never had to prove himself under those circumstances.
Ummm he drove them 92 yards to win the Super Bowl...if that isn't the ultimate pressure and putting a team on your shoulders I'm not sure what is. But who cares about facts right? I'm actually thinking you didn't watch Joe much and are just picking stats.
So again all the winning is Peyton and all the losing is his team. Or does he simply beat lesser competition then struggle when he faces the big dogs?