Brave Volunteer
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2006
- Messages
- 18,452
- Likes
- 22,202
Give it ten years and after all the legislation against football and the growth in the latina population here and we may see soccer become the dominate sport.
Its not as far fetched as some believe because of the lawsuits.
Walk in to a gym where people are actually working out.
It's not 90% Nike. In fact, it's very little Nike. It's Fail or Flag or Asics or UA. I see a lot of Mizuna shoes too.
This thread is so American focused it's not even funny.
In countries where soccer (football) is king, Puma is huge.
Puma is not a secondary brand but they are not huge in America due to the types of sports they were geared to.
I own a lot of Puma. Shirts, shoes, etc.
I own two Nike shirts and one was given to me by a friend.
Man, didn't know there was such a thing as Nike fanboys until this thread.
From what I can count, which isn't very high on Friday's, all but 2 BCS NC's have worn Nike products. Only 2 that haven't are Tennessee and Auburn. I know apparel doesn't help you win, but Nike obviously associates themselves with successful programs. Seems like it would be a great compliment to be associated with them, and would help recruiting a tiny bit. People underestimate the thought process of 17 year old athletes.
I hate going to games at other places and seeing their nike fan-gear, because I'm jealous. Nike looks way better. This is all my opinion, but I think nike is a better product. Anyway, go to any highschool and just count people wearing Adidas vs Nike. I think you'll see a large difference.
Nike is American football.
Adidas is German futbol.
I tried to avoid this thread because I've posted all of this dozens of times before. Here's the short version:
- Tennessee's contract with Adidas runs through July 1, 2015. Any change in provider will not take place until then.
- Tennessee has had discussions with Adidas regarding an extension, and has also taken meetings with Nike and Under Armour. UA is not a big player in his because they have few connections in football and basketball recruiting camps and travel teams.
- Regarding the "second tier" comments, that has been where Nike has put their contract offers in the past. They see their "top tier" as a group of 7-10 schools that move the meter nationally. If you go in a Champs Sports in any state, you'll see their gear. Florida, Alabama, Ohio State, USC, North Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, Georgia and Oregon are schools that currently have "top tier" deals. Tennessee is not getting one of these contracts from Nike. Period.
- "Second tier" Nike schools receive a lower payout and give up design control of uniforms. The schools are given several options, but if Nike wants them to wear an alternate, they're wearing an alternate.
- Adidas offers by far the best financial and equipment contract. Our deal with Adidas is worth more in money and product than all but three Nike contracts. Despite our struggles, we are one of their premier schools and are paid like it.
- If we switch to Nike, which is a possibility, we will be taking less money to do so. Adidas has the right to match any offer made by another company, but UT does not have to take it. At this point, that's a moot point, the financial package that is out there from Nike is well below what Adidas has offered.
- Saw a post that Butch is a "Nike guy," which is completely false. His teams at Central Michigan wore Adidas, his teams at Cincinnati wore Adidas and he was a part of Cincinnati extending their department-wide deal with Adidas just last fall.
- Dave Hart was a Nike guy at Florida State, but he inherited that deal from his predecessor and extended it. He wasn't involved in the last renegotiation with Nike at Alabama. He has built a relationship with people at Adidas in his time here, so his prior ties aren't significant.
- A lot of this "smoke" has come from recruits that say coaches have told them that we're changing. Hate to break it to you guys, but coaches have told recruits that for years. If a player says they love Nike, we'll roll out the "Well our deal is up soon" line. Coaches tell recruits what they want to hear. Always have. Our men's basketball staff told a kid recently that plays for an Adidas-sponsored AAU team that we were close to r-signing with Adidas. It's all about who they're talking to at a given time.
- Oranges don't match is a common complaint. Look at any sideline in college football and show me one where every jacket, sweatshirt and jersey match. You notice it here for two reasons. First, it's your school. You're looking for it. Second, the lighter the color, the bigger the difference appears in different lighting and on different materials. Clemson has a similar problem, they're a Nike school. Florida's oranges don't match, they're a Nike school. Look at Florida State's sideline, 50 shades of garnet and 50 more of gold.
I tried to avoid this thread because I've posted all of this dozens of times before. Here's the short version:
- Tennessee's contract with Adidas runs through July 1, 2015. Any change in provider will not take place until then.
- Tennessee has had discussions with Adidas regarding an extension, and has also taken meetings with Nike and Under Armour. UA is not a big player in his because they have few connections in football and basketball recruiting camps and travel teams.
- Regarding the "second tier" comments, that has been where Nike has put their contract offers in the past. They see their "top tier" as a group of 7-10 schools that move the meter nationally. If you go in a Champs Sports in any state, you'll see their gear. Florida, Alabama, Ohio State, USC, North Carolina, Texas, Oklahoma, Georgia and Oregon are schools that currently have "top tier" deals. Tennessee is not getting one of these contracts from Nike. Period.
- "Second tier" Nike schools receive a lower payout and give up design control of uniforms. The schools are given several options, but if Nike wants them to wear an alternate, they're wearing an alternate.
- Adidas offers by far the best financial and equipment contract. Our deal with Adidas is worth more in money and product than all but three Nike contracts. Despite our struggles, we are one of their premier schools and are paid like it.
- If we switch to Nike, which is a possibility, we will be taking less money to do so. Adidas has the right to match any offer made by another company, but UT does not have to take it. At this point, that's a moot point, the financial package that is out there from Nike is well below what Adidas has offered.
- Saw a post that Butch is a "Nike guy," which is completely false. His teams at Central Michigan wore Adidas, his teams at Cincinnati wore Adidas and he was a part of Cincinnati extending their department-wide deal with Adidas just last fall.
- Dave Hart was a Nike guy at Florida State, but he inherited that deal from his predecessor and extended it. He wasn't involved in the last renegotiation with Nike at Alabama. He has built a relationship with people at Adidas in his time here, so his prior ties aren't significant.
- A lot of this "smoke" has come from recruits that say coaches have told them that we're changing. Hate to break it to you guys, but coaches have told recruits that for years. If a player says they love Nike, we'll roll out the "Well our deal is up soon" line. Coaches tell recruits what they want to hear. Always have. Our men's basketball staff told a kid recently that plays for an Adidas-sponsored AAU team that we were close to r-signing with Adidas. It's all about who they're talking to at a given time.
- Oranges don't match is a common complaint. Look at any sideline in college football and show me one where every jacket, sweatshirt and jersey match. You notice it here for two reasons. First, it's your school. You're looking for it. Second, the lighter the color, the bigger the difference appears in different lighting and on different materials. Clemson has a similar problem, they're a Nike school. Florida's oranges don't match, they're a Nike school. Look at Florida State's sideline, 50 shades of garnet and 50 more of gold.