Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,845
That fault lies squarely on the civilian leadership though. We can win every single battle yet if we can’t manage to get the people we help to manage and protect their newly established government then it just caves when we leave. This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan.Tactical victories dont really matter if they dont help accomplish strategic goals. It's that type of thinking that has involved in every pit of vipers and nothing good ever comes of it. If we dont have real, achievable strategic goals for the military, we shouldnt be there. We made afghanistan a no win situation for ourselves.
We accomplished every military objective we set out to do. We won the "war" in Afghanistan. We failed at the nation building. Are you going to declare Iraq a loss when it falls in the next couple of years?Winning wars is not about exiting under your terms, its about completing objectives.
Oh, you can lose wars by not have realistic objectives or having a failed or no strategy to complete the objectives. That's called losing.
We're back to the, I "could have" won the war, I just "didn't want to" win the war. LOL
Kramer Bets Jerry - Seinfeld
That is Champions of Life material.
Huh, that was the objective (nation building), it was a failure. The government basically fell in what 24 hours. The other objective was to remove the terrorist groups, that failed to. Some of them are running the country. LOL Loss.We accomplished every military objective we set out to do. We won the "war" in Afghanistan. We failed at the nation building. Are you going to declare Iraq a loss when it falls in the next couple of years?
As far as Vietnam, If you don't understand what happened there, then debating it with you is a lost cause.
Sorry for the copyright infringement @apevol. After much searching I believe we have found the Monarch of the Strawmen. This dude is undefeated in arguments he makes up and dunks onHuh, that was the objective (nation building), it was a failure. The government basically fell in what 24 hours. The other objective was to remove the terrorist groups, that failed to. Some of them are running the country. LOL Loss.
No major objectives were complete, the North invaded and took over and won. Loss.
"We" won the stupid dumb whitey gets killed award for no reason award and apparently the Champions of Life of award.
Lol. Danzig was 98% german in 1938, it was still 98% german when the nazis moved in. There was no pre-war cleansing. Now you want to talk about what happened to Germans AFTER the war, go ahead. But pre war was all bs false flag Nazi propaganda.Danzig was a majority German city at that time. What is it today? And you post this tweet about ethnic cleansing and don't realize how silly you sound right now.
The two signatories of the Budapest Memorandum who committed to aid for Ukraine when the fourth signatory invaded them huh? Sounds legit.Maybe Europe should go to Putin and 3elensky and sue for peace instead of throwing more weapons and sanctions at the problem, because obviously that isn't working. Leave the Americans and Brits out of the negotiations.
Just noticed the person tweeting this has the Ukraine flag emoji. I wonder if they will connect the dots...
Yes, which is a strategic defeat. We wanted to established a democracy in Afghanistan. We hung around that long so that theoretically they would have a chance to stabilize before we left. They didnt. That's defeat even if our military didnt lose.That fault lies squarely on the civilian leadership though. We can win every single battle yet if we can’t manage to get the people we help to manage and protect their newly established government then it just caves when we leave. This is exactly what happened in Afghanistan.
I don’t disagree on that my inference here by the new intellectual is we’ve been suffering military defeats we’ve done no such thing. But we absolutely suck at nation building.Yes, which is a strategic defeat. We wanted to established a democracy in Afghanistan. We hung around that long so that theoretically they would have a chance to stabilize before we left. They didnt. That's defeat even if our military didnt lose.
I will just mention that after 9/11, one of the very first things that George Bush said was that we would NOT stay around for 20 years to occupy the middle east. This was at a presser before we actually attacked. And I don't think you can have that attitude, but I realize the public doesn't go along with the forever occupiers attitude. There's no good way to do it. I was very discouraged by that, some 21 years ago almost.
I always tell people, we occupy Germany and Japan TODAY. They can argue, but it's important to give them enough shock to consider exactly what are we doing TODAY 75 years after world war 2. If people at least try to figure out where the USA military is stationed overseas right now, they can at least try to guess why. Nation building is really pretty much impossible. You can never be sure. Human nature is always out to get you. It's not because somebody is a republican and somebody else is a democrat, either. That kind of means to explain it is truly only satisfying for idiots.
Huh, that was the objective (nation building), it was a failure. The government basically fell in what 24 hours. The other objective was to remove the terrorist groups, that failed to. Some of them are running the country. LOL Loss.
No major objectives were complete, the North invaded and took over and won. Loss.
"We" won the stupid dumb whitey gets killed award for no reason award and apparently the Champions of Life of award.
Your knowledge of history is astonishing, Vietcong was a spent force after TET but you clearly already knew that. We gave the people of Iraq and Afghanistan every chance to succeed. It’s on them and US political leaders not the US military.
1. YOu are under the false impression those people might want what you want.
2. This lead to objectives which were never going to be accomplished, the strategies were never going to work as the objective was unattainable, see 1.
3. This eventually lead to a lose as the objectives were failures.
No, its on you, and the other stupid andor greedy white people. They didn't need your help. Matter of fact, the United States after $2+t caused it to fall in what about 24 hours, that wasn't happening before the U.S. showed up.
Its rinse and repeat since the time of the crusades. Losses. How many times did you get your penis stuck in your zipper before you learned your lesson? My guess, quite a few.
![]()
You should see the gems he posted about Will Wade and LSU firing him. He's a waste of time.Sorry for the copyright infringement @apevol. After much searching I believe we have found the Monarch of the Strawmen. This dude is undefeated in arguments he makes up and dunks on
View attachment 485400
You keep going on about stupid and or greedy white people. How do you describe yourself?
1. YOu are under the false impression those people might want what you want.
2. This lead to objectives which were never going to be accomplished, the strategies were never going to work as the objective was unattainable, see 1.
3. This eventually lead to a lose as the objectives were failures.
No, its on you, and the other stupid andor greedy white people. They didn't need your help. Matter of fact, the United States after $2+t caused it to fall in what about 24 hours, that wasn't happening before the U.S. showed up.
Its rinse and repeat since the time of the crusades. Losses. How many times did you get your penis stuck in your zipper before you learned your lesson? My guess, quite a few.
![]()