War in Ukraine

#47,176
#47,176
DonjoVol said:
His party has roughly 80% of the seats in the Russian parliament and is the party that is obviously preferred by the majority of Russian citizens. If Putin is somehow replaced it will more than likely be by someone else from the United Russia party. That was the point being made.

Some of you guys really do lack very basic reading comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
You still struggle with obvious discussion. Maybe one of your co-clowns can explain it to you. This is low level cognitive stuff. His parties control means zero about his stability as leader. I will pause and let you marinate. You need to. You are embarrassing yourself again. What's even funnier is you think "party" matters there. Jesus dude.

Let me clue you in. Putin himself would identify as a gay nazi tranny if it guaranteed him 10 years more in power.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, NorthDallas40, Septic and 1 other person
#47,177
#47,177
Rasputin_Vol said:
Read "Confessions of An Economic Hitman". That has been the US policy since the Dulles brothers in the 1950s.
Click to expand...

Ras, we know about the Dulles Bros and their renegade escapades just as we know about some other off the reservation stuff the CIA has pulled. They were not official acts of US policy; in NCAA parlance those would be lack of institutional control. People generally never seem to grasp that bigger bureaucracies mean less control - not more and better oversight. Those who profit from it know exactly that control is pretty much inversely related to the size of "management".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hunerwadel
#47,178
#47,178
Rasputin_Vol said:
What is the difference between the US being allied and sponsoring a country that car bombed a journalist/activist (Dugina) and some random ME country car bombing someone?

It should be obvious that we are officially a state sponsor of terrorism at this point.
Click to expand...

No doubt we are a state sponsor of terror. Have been for decades.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rasputin_Vol
#47,180
#47,180
volfanhill said:
You still struggle with obvious discussion. Maybe one of your co-clowns can explain it to you. This is low level cognitive stuff. His parties control means zero about his stability as leader. I will pause and let you marinate. You need to. You are embarrassing yourself again. What's even funnier is you think "party" matters there. Jesus dude.

Let me clue you in. Putin himself would identify as a gay nazi tranny if it guaranteed him 10 years more in power.
Click to expand...
You really need to learn how to read and process information. Blindly following only mainstream media in the U.S. and Europe has clearly affected some people's ability to think in this thread.

You and others have stated that you want Putin removed from power. If it did happen, which is unlikely, the next leader of Russia would more than likely come from the United Russia party. Why? Because they have majority control and is the party that's preferred by most Russian citizens. It's really not that difficult to understand.

Now you and the rest of your crew need to stop being drama queens. You all are really embarrassing yourselves at this point. If you guys like drama that much then please watch Days of Our Lives. It's still on the air. Or maybe you can some find reruns of Falcon Crest or Dynasty.
 
#47,181
#47,181
DonjoVol said:
You really need to learn how to read and process information. Blindly following only mainstream media in the U.S. and Europe has clearly affected some people's ability to think in this thread.

You and others have stated that you want Putin removed from power. If it did happen, which is unlikely, the next leader of Russia would more than likely come from the United Russia party. Why? Because they have majority control and is the party that's preferred by most Russian citizens. It's really not that difficult to understand.

Now you and the rest of your crew need to stop being drama queens. You all are really embarrassing yourselves at this point. If you guys like drama that much then please watch Days of Our Lives. It's still on the air. Or maybe you can some find reruns of Falcon Crest or Dynasty.
Click to expand...
Lol. Of course they would come from that party you midget. Guess what? They don't all fall in line with the guy who jails and murders opposition. Who they claim to be doesn't mean it's who they are. And the absolute dumbest approach is to accept Putin bc the next guy might be worse. Nah. The next guy wants to be rich and powerful. Ok. Just don't be an idiot like Vlad. Clown.


It's like you guys don't even attempt to understand how people act under despots. Please read a book
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, NorthDallas40, hog88 and 1 other person
#47,184
#47,184
AM64 said:
Ras, we know about the Dulles Bros and their renegade escapades just as we know about some other off the reservation stuff the CIA has pulled. They were not acts of US policy; in NCAA parlance those would be lack of institutional control. People generally never seem to grasp that bigger bureaucracies mean less control - not more and better oversight. Those who profit from it know exactly that control is pretty much inversely related to the size of "management".
Click to expand...
What difference does that make when the end result is the same as if it was official policy?

And saying "official" is weasel/lawyer language... no different than what many of you all that say there was nothing in writing about NATO agreeing to not expand east. You all hide behind these loopholes and nuances to provide outs. We don't negotiate in good faith. Our word means nothing. And we use snake-ish logic to justify our actions. You should be ashamed to have typed what I highlighted because you know good and damn well that is a snake-ish/weasel way for plausible deniability.
 
#47,186
#47,186
DonjoVol said:
You really need to learn how to read and process information. Blindly following only mainstream media in the U.S. and Europe has clearly affected some people's ability to think in this thread.

You and others have stated that you want Putin removed from power. If it did happen, which is unlikely, the next leader of Russia would more than likely come from the United Russia party. Why? Because they have majority control and is the party that's preferred by most Russian citizens. It's really not that difficult to understand.

Now you and the rest of your crew need to stop being drama queens. You all are really embarrassing yourselves at this point. If you guys like drama that much then please watch Days of Our Lives. It's still on the air. Or maybe you can some find reruns of Falcon Crest or Dynasty.
Click to expand...
According to @hog88, if Putin is gone, the rest of the people around him would be gone also.

Again, the only hope these guys have is for 3elensky to march to Moscow, or for Navalny or Saakashvili to somehow gain power.
 
#47,188
#47,188
volfanhill said:
Lol. Of course they would come from that party you midget. Guess what? They don't all fall in line with the guy who jails and murders opposition. Who they claim to be doesn't mean it's who they are. And the absolute dumbest approach is to accept Putin bc the next guy might be worse. Nah. The next guy wants to be rich and powerful. Ok. Just don't be an idiot like Vlad. Clown.


It's like you guys don't even attempt to understand how people act under despots. Please read a book
Click to expand...
Lol. You do realize you support Zelensky who wants to jail and murder opposition. Which is why he banned numerous political party and why Ukraine has state run television.

Give us some names of some Russian policies from the United Russia party that you would like to see in charge. Since you are now an expert on Russian politics you can tell the forum here who would be better for Russia than Putin.
 
#47,192
#47,192
Rasputin_Vol said:
The Soviet Union was (key word is "was", past tense) one of the most dangerous countries on the planet... but in particular to it's own citizens. The United States, on the other hand, is (present tense) the present day terror state. Now granted, the US is not killing millions industrially as the USSR or Maoist China, but we do our fair share of destruction and control with regards to our empire.
Click to expand...
The soviet union WAS Russia. Can't go around claiming to be the second roman empire without Moscow being Rome. It was, and it still is. All the goods flow into Moscow and only **** flows out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, AM64, NorthDallas40 and 3 others
#47,193
#47,193
apevol said:
The soviet union WAS Russia. Can't go around claiming to be the second roman empire without Moscow being Rome. It was, and it still is. All the goods flow into Moscow and only **** flows out.
Click to expand...
No, you sound ridiculous. Nazi Germany is not the same as the Germany of today. Imperial Japan is not the same as Japan of today. The USSR is not the same as the Russian Federation today.
 
#47,195
#47,195
If anyone was ever wondering why are local Russian trollbots try so hard, its because they are trying to graduate to the next level in troll school which is very similiar to getting to do this:
Woman Scammed by ‘Russian Astronaut’ Who Claimed to Need Money to Return to Earth

If their computer aptitude is high enough they might even get a chance at some cyberwarfare. Doubtful though as they technically have been repeating the same grade for years now here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64, NorthDallas40 and Rickyvol77
#47,196
#47,196
Rasputin_Vol said:
No, you sound ridiculous. Nazi Germany is not the same as the Germany of today. Imperial Japan is not the same as Japan of today. The USSR is not the same as the Russian Federation today.
Click to expand...
Yes, Germany is not pursuing expansionist military policy. Nor is Japan. But one of those is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, AM64, NorthDallas40 and 3 others
#47,197
#47,197
Rasputin_Vol said:
No, you sound ridiculous. Nazi Germany is not the same as the Germany of today. Imperial Japan is not the same as Japan of today. The USSR is not the same as the Russian Federation today.
Click to expand...
One of your three examples still has many government officials from the previous regime in the current regime.

I'll let you do the math and figure that one out..
 
  • Like
Reactions: zeppelin128, AM64 and NorthDallas40
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top