So, you admitted the west was involved initially and now are trying to say they’re just handing over old weapons with cobwebs on them…nothing shiny and new…cherry picking a few items to try and make a point. The list of advanced American/western weapons in Ukraine is extensive and far from obsolete.
NATO is absolutely calling the shots in Ukraine…militarily and politically. Western mercenaries are falling everyday, including Americans…the latest, a female combat medic from Knoxville, Tn. just yesterday.
Ukraine has had 8 years of western training, so that tells me that a lot of what was trained, isn’t there anymore. They’re exhausting thousands a week…it’s simple math.
When did I say we werent giving them weapons, or even training? This is just another strawman. My argument is that it doesnt mean Russia is fighting NATO just because of some training or equipment.
And which is it? Is Russia fighting NATO equipment in substantial numbers, or is Russia blowing most of it up at the border, or what happened to the weapons being sold off on the black market? Seems like between Russian destruction of the shipments and Ukrainian corruption there wouldnt be enough left to fight Russia. But here you are, talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Thousands a week of their super western trained NATO mercenary death cult NAZI troops? Yeah no. Simply because there was never that many of them to lose. Not sure how many there were, but it's not over 100k. The western trained guys are their special forces, so unless you think they have ONLY lost these specially trained guys your argument doesnt hold water.
I wont shed a tear for mercs or either side. They are doing what they are being paid for. They have the easiest out.
And was shooting up Poland part of that US decision making? This is why I enjoy your guys conspiracies. They go so overboard with how much power you think we have, it's easy to find examples where we clearly dont have the power. Zelensky was calling for our intervention, seems like if we were controlling him he would k ow we would oust the attacks as his and not Russias.
Or what about Zelensky asking for more money? Seems like if we were in charge we would give it without asking? That way it's not in the public eye. Or if you want to argue we tell him to ask for money, why dont we tell him to ask for the amount we are actually going to provide?
You guys always go for these super complicated, twisting explanations when the simple logical answer is sitting right in front of you. We arent in control. Of any of it. We are being just as reactionary as we are to every event.