AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,590
- Likes
- 42,430
Private industry is so much more efficient than the government. Private companies have a motive to make a profit, government has a motive to get a bigger budget of free money from the taxpayers. I don't care where the technology comes from, but SpaceX has made monumental strides in space flight by landing their first stage rockets and re-using them. Boeing will never do that ever, because they suck.
There's a bit of difference. SpaceX uses their rockets to put a huge number of satellites into orbit - a means to an end (and maybe a menace to navigation); basically they developed a space oriented trucking division and benefitted from a lot of NASA pioneering. Always cheaper when someone else does the groundwork and you have a commercial application. I'm not a NASA apologist, but they were doing one time custom work, and SpaceX is doing commercial work on a repetitive basis. Let's also not forget all the technology that SpaceX has at it's fingertips vs what was available in the 50s and 60s when things like the Saturn rockets were being developed. Those factors and others change the cost equation immensely. I won't argue with you about Boeing, though.
Another issue that we aren't addressing is the expensive infrastructure to keep the nation running. One new nuclear plant since the 80s (and it's not operating yet), no new refineries since the 70s? Largely it seems because private industry isn't interested in investing in expensive long lead projects. Private industry shows a willingness to profit when the path is clear and short, but seems to want to sit on it's collective butt when the path isn't certain and they know someone else (like .gov) will eventually have to do the groundwork - or pay them like Boeing to do it.