Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,842
So you want to try and sell that a Republican administration would act one bit different with regard to aid provided? Go on…
View attachment 548561
The biggest detractor thus far is Trump. And I absolutely believe he’d flip in a New York minute and keep the same level of aid going if not more. He’d bombastically call out Europe too but that would just be the side show entertainmentIt would depend on who the R was, most would act pretty much the same as Biden and stuff pockets. A very small few would probably push European nations to be the main contributors of aid.
yeah I couldn't think of too many differences.Yes, one is smaller with far fewer people, power, and influence.
You do realize there is a difference between the USSR and the Russian Federation, right?
Putin is trying to turn Russia back into the Soviet Union.Yep. One is a paranoid, depressed culture that readily accept psychopathic despots as leaders, has nuclear weapons, and views the US as evil as their sworn enemy. The other is.....wait.....uh.......
Hmmmmmm, other than population numbers, there is not a whole lot of difference.
In both cases, their nuclear weapons are the only things that make them relevant, given their conventional forces are ill equipped conscripts led by drunken morons in a military culture of murder, pillage, and plunder.
I wonder is @Rasputin_Vol has the stones to watch that and offer up anything but a deflection as a response.
LOL, of course not. Who am I kidding, he ignores the inconvenient.
decries ad hominem attacks and then turns around and uses ad hominem attacks two words later. that's got to be a record for hypocrisy.
This is part of the reason why your argument doesn't hold water. The other is that most people you are attacking aren't actually pro-Zelensky. at best/worst they are pro-Ukrainian. you are just resorting to another logical fallacy, red herrings, to try and change the argument from one you can't win, pro-Ukraine, to one you think you can win, pro-Zelensky.
and even pro-Ukraine is probably too strong of a term, but that doesn't fit into your narrow field of arguments so thats probably the best distinction I can make.
Yet another bad argument you make is "every pro-Ukraine tweet is somehow legit". thats a bad, false assumption on your part. You are always going to get a sampling bias from individuals on any topic. they aren't going to quote something they don't agree with. There are TONS of obvious pro-Ukrainian bs that doesn't get posted to this thread, or even referenced. and if anything Ras and crew are guilty of the same thing you are calling out. When was the last time they posted something that framed Russia in a negative light? Do you REALLY think that ALL of the bad is one sided in a war?
What will happen first: Russia runs out of missiles or The West runs out of money to give Kyiv?