War in Ukraine

[NorthDallas40]

I don't have any links to either losses, I just see what people post about the Russian losses, I was wondering if they have a site or reports on Ukraine losses.

The point was the Ukrainian MoD actually publishes daily updates. The Russian MoD publishes nothing and instead relies on trolls pushing unsupported out of their ass wild claims. We have two such trolls here in fact.

 

[volgr]

If Putin is killed by who?

We aren't doing much of anything, weak innefectual leadership is why we are where we are. Not because we are doing too much. China and their Arab partners along with Russia are the aggressors at the moment. And they are successful because of their aggressiveness or their attachment to a powerful aggressor in the case of Russia and the other Arab states.

Decades of failed foreign policy, combined with a weak current leader........ And here we are

Putin killed by whomever. His replacement would be Medvedev (not the tennis player, lol). No one talks about this. You hear idiots like Lindsey Graham spout off that Putin needs to be taken out but no one talks about who would replace him.

We aren't doing much of anything? US leadership continues to provoke and escalate toward WW3. That is why China, Russia and their Arab/African/South American partners are meeting the West's aggressive actions with aggressions of their own.

 

[Velo Vol]

Simple: It won’t.

BRICS at this point is basically just a China mouthpiece, anyways.

It's true that, for various reasons, other countries are relying slightly less on the dollar.

But China is the only alternative that matters. If other countries want to hitch their wagon to that star, more power to them.

 

[TVOLS]

Any leader or President sends there country men and women off to fight should also be prepared to die themselves. I get the part he’s in position to retaliate, but that’s about it. He’s an orc.

 

[LouderVol]

Why would Russia take Bakhmut quickly? It was heavily defended which means if Russia tried to take it too quickly they would have lost an extraordinary amount of men. Instead they took it slowly and methodically. Creating basically a turkey shoot scenario for poor Ukrainians. Due to this, they were happy to allow Zelensky to keep throwing more men into their meat grinder. Ukraine losses in Bakhmut alone have been very high compared with Russia. I don't know where you are getting your info....actually, I do, from western propaganda outlets. Good luck. This is why you are always wrong.



As the intel leaks pointed out, Ukraine's air defense is just about gone. Not that it was all that effective anyway as it was a hodgepodge of equipment, but as Russian missiles have shown over the last few months, when they want to strike a target, they can and do. However, as was shown the other day in Russia's latest missile blitz, it is becoming much easier. They hit 9 barracks and 2 huge arm depots. This isn't even arguable at this point.



Cope. Once again confession through projection. What little Ukraine can muster to fire is done in a haphazard approach. From time to time they will receive good western intel and hit something of value but it is rare. Even the recent oil depot strike wasn't important to Russia militarily.



Yeah, they were. Most of them are now dead or injured. This is another reason, going back to Bakhmut, that Ukraine is seeing rising kill ratios in Bakhmut closer to 10:1 or more. These folks picked up off the street against their will, are being given 4 weeks of training at best (mostly outside of Ukraine) and shipped back in to the frontlines with limited equipment and no experience. It's effing grotesque the US allows this to continue, but this is what the US has become, a death cult.



My claim was from early in the war, when Ukraine did have a well trained and equipped military. That is no longer applicable. They are being demilitarized very quickly. Even with those well trained men, Russia was taking cities like Mauripol with roughly even numbers. Tell me again how badly Russian troops have performed. As I have said, I don't know if the US could have taken Mauripol or Bakhmut much better than Russia. They have made plenty of mistakes, mostly from bad assumptions at the start of the war, but overall their performance has been impressive.

If Bakhmut is such a trap why is Russia closing it? why did Russia try closing continuously for months? They could have achieved the same results just by staging their men and equipment. that would be an actual feint. and it would have cost Russia pretty much nothing.

You guys were on here consistently since August talking about how Bakhmut was about to fall and it was going to take Ukraine down with it. Now 9 months later you change your rhetoric into it being some grand Russian plan to be slow, how convenient.

and I ask again, since Russia has been taking advantage of *Ukraine* so much, how is Russia going to capitalize on it? where is their big offensive going to come from? Or are they going to give Ukraine months again to dig in and just weight out the Russian attacks. When can we expect to see the benefits from this trap?

 

[KB5252]

Putin killed by whomever. His replacement would be Medvedev (not the tennis player, lol). No one talks about this. You hear idiots like Lindsey Graham spout off that Putin needs to be taken out but no one talks about who would replace him.

We aren't doing much of anything? US leadership continues to provoke and escalate toward WW3. That is why China, Russia and their Arab/African/South American partners are meeting the West's aggressive actions with aggressions of their own.

What aggressive actions are we taking? Arming a country who was invaded by a larger supposed world power?

Shooting down surveillance balloons after they collect intelligence over our skies for a week?

Hedge to protect our investments in Taiwan as they are being threatened by invasion from another world power?

None of these are escalations, they are reactions to an opposing action.

 

[Volsdeep4]

Because Russia is acting rationally to a building a threat in their backyard.

That is my point though. Pro Russia- believes they are doing right. Pro Ukraine- believe they are doing what’s right. Why can’t it be they are both wrong. Russia invades neighboring countries every couple years to get what they want. Usa uses militias in other countries to get what they want. That’s both wrong, but yet, good for that economy.

 

[Volsdeep4]

Someone should ask our leadership, if Putin is killed how is Medvedev any better...considering he has been much more hawkish than Putin.

If us wanted him dead you don’t think he’d be dead? A tiny drone just made its way through the night.

 

[RDU VOL#14]

Is this the UAV that I saw a clipping of that said “an attempt to kill Putin”?

#maskirovka again

 

[scooty_vol]

The point was the Ukrainian MoD actually publishes daily updates. The Russian MoD publishes nothing and instead relies on trolls pushing unsupported out of their ass wild claims. We have two such trolls here in fact.

That makes sense

 

[BeardedVol]

That is my point though. Pro Russia- believes they are doing right. Pro Ukraine- believe they are doing what’s right. Why can’t it be they are both wrong. Russia invades neighboring countries every couple years to get what they want. Usa uses militias in other countries to get what they want. That’s both wrong, but yet, good for that economy.

It's wrong for Ukraine to defend itself from an invasion by their imperialistic neighbor?

 

[WilcoVolsFan]

Because Russia is acting rationally to a building a threat in their backyard.

Slava Ukraini.

 

[Hunerwadel]

It's wrong for Ukraine to defend itself from an invasion by their imperialistic neighbor?

But...but...the Nazis

 

[evillawyer]

Because Russia is acting rationally to a building a threat in their backyard.

98 pound weakling muscles up because the 300 pound bully keeps beating him up and stealing his lunch. And in your mind ... that justifies the 300 pound bully's continuing to beat up on the guy and steal his lunch.

Cool ethics you got there.

 

[Burhead]

That is my point though. Pro Russia- believes they are doing right. Pro Ukraine- believe they are doing what’s right. Why can’t it be they are both wrong. Russia invades neighboring countries every couple years to get what they want. Usa uses militias in other countries to get what they want. That’s both wrong, but yet, good for that economy.

In what world is defending your homeland "wrong"?

 

[WilcoVolsFan]

That is my point though. Pro Russia- believes they are doing right. Pro Ukraine- believe they are doing what’s right. Why can’t it be they are both wrong. Russia invades neighboring countries every couple years to get what they want. Usa uses militias in other countries to get what they want. That’s both wrong, but yet, good for that economy.

Remind me which country the US is currently invading by recruiting prisoners in exchange for commuting their prison sentences, annexing their land, kidnapping children, and committing mass rapes?

 

[WilcoVolsFan]

98 pound weakling muscles up because the 300 pound bully keeps beating him up and stealing his lunch. And in your mind ... that justifies the 300 pound bully's continuing to beat up on the guy and steal his lunch.

Cool ethics you got there.

More like 98 pound quick-twitch dude is boxing the $hit out of the fat slob who is suddenly getting exposed.

But you're spot on about that commie-lovers crap ethics.

 

[BeardedVol]

Nothing bizarre about this at all...

 

[Volsdeep4]

It's wrong for Ukraine to defend itself from an invasion by their imperialistic neighbor?

Absolutely not. Defend your country lines and sovereignty

 

[Volsdeep4]

In what world is defending your homeland "wrong"?

I might of said that wrong or not how it meant to come out. More or less Russia thinks they are doing what’s right and everyone else doesn’t. So I understand them being pro Russia (that is what it is) but why not say both governments are corrupt and wrong?

 

[WilcoVolsFan]

Nothing bizarre about his at all...

Eez seekret Amerikan saboteurs as pictured here.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ @volgr & @Volsdeep4 will believe it.

 

[AM64]

Someone should ask our leadership, if Putin is killed how is Medvedev any better...considering he has been much more hawkish than Putin.

You really think whatever that was is an attempt to kill Putin?

LOL, I gave you way too much credit!

The real irony in banning UAVs is that Ukraine would have no intention of complying anyway, so it's effectively just a ban on Russian UAVs. Are the Russians afraid some of their own might be out to drone Pootin? If they are, it sure would be nice to think they have a better plan.

 

[RDU VOL#14]

Shocking I tell you. Helen Keller saw this coming

 

[Volsdeep4]

Eez seekret Amerikan saboteurs as pictured here.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ @volgr & @Volsdeep4 will believe it.

?
Why am I mentioned with that guy?

 

[FLVOL_79]

Keep this in mind.

Why do third world people, like Russians, think their obvious bullsh!t will work on anyone in a first world country?