AM64
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 11, 2016
- Messages
- 28,584
- Likes
- 42,423
Meanwhile... this is America.
"Roadway Is Gone": Tanker Explosion Destroys I-95 Bridge In Philadelphia | ZeroHedge
Slow your horses. This bridge, in my opinion, represents our foreign policy. While China and Russia builds bridges, the US destroys bridges. I was clearly not assigning any blame to anyone on the bridge collapse. I was simply highlighting the symbolism of this one event to the entire picture.What is the correlation here? Are you trying to say that this bridge was intentionally destroyed by someone like the dam in ukraine? If so, a few questions... Who did it? What was the purpose? What advantage is gained by that party? What evidence do have to back up your theory (this one will probably be an issue for you)?
Slow your horses. This bridge, in my opinion, represents our foreign policy. While China and Russia builds bridges, the US destroys bridges. I was clearly not assigning any blame to anyone on the bridge collapse. I was simply highlighting the symbolism of this one event to the entire picture.
Relax
Have china or russia have any recent infrastructure problems?I did not assign blame to anything or anyone with regards to the Philadelphia Bridge collapse. Just stop.
That isn't the point. China and Russia are in the business of building bridges. While the US is in the business of destroying bridges/infrastructure.Have china or russia have any recent infrastructure problems?
Can you say yes or no?
Four people killed in expressway bridge collapse in China's Hubei province
it's not that the money would have otherwise gone to fix hunger. It's that our politicians don't seem to care about the high prices. So they 1 avoid fixing OUR issues. And 2 make it worse by giving away money we dont have right after dodging a default.I guess I'm being intellectually dishonest then. I don't see even a remote link between the value of the arms we're sending to Ukraine and affordable groceries.
Nor do I accept that not sending arms to Ukraine would directly or indirectly reduce the high cost of groceries. The meme was dumb in that assumes that the value of the arms would have gone into alleviating hunger and we both know it wouldn't because of the vastly different political divides that would have to be bridged to make that happen. Military budgets wouldn't suddenly become food subsidies for the poor. It's a false dichotomy, and a bad one to boot.
If you want to try and connect the dots between military spending and inflation, then that's a different discussion but you've got a lot of twists, turns and hurdles to get over and around to make the case that milk costs what it costs because we sent a patriot battery to Ukraine.