NorthDallas40
Displaced Hillbilly
- Joined
- Oct 3, 2014
- Messages
- 57,395
- Likes
- 83,652
Dude, no. I live way too close to KS for him to be that near. Maybe Arizona or Texas with @NorthDallas40

Put him on beach front property in Oklahoma with GV.
Dude, no. I live way too close to KS for him to be that near. Maybe Arizona or Texas with @NorthDallas40
Again, we have been over it but you still refuse to admit to any possibility that might indicate that Russia is not in 100% complete control of the situation.Assuming Russia would attack the ZNPP in this manner, why in the world would the Russians need to detonate two units when they are the world's leader in nuclear weapons? They could simply drop a nuke if they were going that route. No different than them simply turning off the taps on Nordstream instead of blowing them up.
Also, why would the Russians cause a nuclear disaster in the recently reclaimed territories, knowing full well that the fallout wouldn't just be localized in Ukraine but would likely affect most of it's own territories within a large radius?
Uh you mean besides the huge land mine fields they made, the near constant bombardments of ukrainian territory, the deportations of tens of thousands of locals, the huge conscription of their own population to fight in this war, their own use of depleted uranium ammuntion, the literal tons of lead they are dumping into ground soil from all the shooting.They give enough of a damn to not deliberately ruin productive farmland in the surrounding regions and wiping out a large number of labor. Even if you want to buy in to this racist trope, it still doesn't make economic sense to create a false flag at the expense of ruining a large area. And a false flag that no one in the West will buy. Hell, the Russians didn't even bomb Nordstream or the Kakhovka Dam and they still are getting blamed for it by the West.
Assuming Russia would attack the ZNPP in this manner, why in the world would the Russians need to detonate two units when they are the world's leader in nuclear weapons? They could simply drop a nuke if they were going that route. No different than them simply turning off the taps on Nordstream instead of blowing them up.
Also, why would the Russians cause a nuclear disaster in the recently reclaimed territories, knowing full well that the fallout wouldn't just be localized in Ukraine but would likely affect most of it's own territories within a large radius?
This country is far from the ideals of the founders. Our very involvement in Ukraine is just one example. Our pandemic response is another.FYP stupid post Vlad. FTR, you disgust me. If you actually live in the States you should really think about today and what was given up so you can spout such stupid, disgusting crap.
It has been Moe. Ever since we’ve seen them pulling out T-54s and T-55s. Try to keep up. Unless of course you consider a T-54/55 a modern main battle tank… which absolutely nobody except Russian propagandists do.So now the narrative is that they are not only running out of shells, but running out of tanks?
It has been Moe. Ever since we’ve seen them pulling out T-54s and T-55s. Try to keep up. Unless of course you consider a T-54/55 a modern main battle tank… which absolutely nobody except Russian propagandists do.
You need to read this. I posted this story last year when it first came out. This is from a British website (Royal United Services Institute).10m shells
amazing
@Rasputin_Vol, given your historical ownership arguments, I'm sure you're good with China taking Vladivostok back, right? You are a principled man, afterall.And that would be absolutely hilarious if they did too
View attachment 561053
@Rasputin_Vol hey Moe is this a good time to use this meme now?
View attachment 561054