newyorkvol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Mar 23, 2010
- Messages
- 3,809
- Likes
- 5,561
And that’s another patently incorrect stance. Ukraine should not be considered at all for NATO membership while hostilities are ongoing. There needs to be a return to normalcy and sovereign borders established before that dialog should occur.He is pushing for immediate entry into NATO as well
His loyalty seems to still reside in Ukraine
It really isn’t a tough call at all. The munitions are largely condemned by most all western countries and the US is in the minority position of not banning and condemning them. Oh wait… we did condemn Russia’s use of them… and then gave them to Ukraine. This is on par with Russia using depleted uranium rounds from day one and then cryimg foul on the west supplying depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine.Somewhat but tough call given the way things are going.
It's pretty clear to me why Ukraine would want in. But the question is moot. There is not enough support here or abroad for Ukraine to be admitted at this time given their current situation. I cannot see why NATO would want admit a country already at war unless the situation deteriorates to the point that NATO feels they have to act collectively. Something like tactical nuclear strikes by Russia. And if that happens Russia will be alone against in the world anyway.WTF would Ukraine need to join NATO right now if NATO is supporting them anyways?
It really isn’t a tough call at all. The munitions are largely condemned by most all western countries and the US is in the minority position of not banning and condemning them. Oh wait… we did condemn Russia’s use of them… and then gave them to Ukraine. This is on par with Russia using depleted uranium rounds from day one and then cryimg foul on the west supplying depleted uranium rounds to Ukraine.
I'm not sure what this comment is in reference to???
You believe what you read/hear/see in the news? I don't. Walter Cronkite unmasked about biased Vietnam reporting popped that bubble years ago. Then there was the Three Mile Island reporting - talk about people not knowing what they were talking about. It got reinforced one day years later when reading the second of two local daily newspapers. The story wasn't even particularly political, but the republican newspaper and the dem newspaper almost made whatever it was sound like two completely separate events. The lessons repeat. I take what the news delivers with a grain of salt. How can you remember the Trump Russia Collusion, misquoted quotes, impeachments, etc and believe any current news organization is due the least bit of respect? These days you can't even believe all that you see because the video is selectively edited.
I can't believe you asked me, of all people, if I believe everything I see in the news.You believe what you read/hear/see in the news? I don't. Walter Cronkite unmasked about biased Vietnam reporting popped that bubble years ago. Then there was the Three Mile Island reporting - talk about people not knowing what they were talking about. It got reinforced one day years later when reading the second of two local daily newspapers. The story wasn't even particularly political, but the republican newspaper and the dem newspaper almost made whatever it was sound like two completely separate events. The lessons repeat. I take what the news delivers with a grain of salt. How can you remember the Trump Russia Collusion, misquoted quotes, impeachments, etc and believe any current news organization is due the least bit of respect? These days you can't even believe all that you see because the video is selectively edited.
So are you saying you don’t buy all that Russian media propaganda ******** you post? Good… progressI can't believe you asked me, of all people, if I believe everything I see in the news.
Also, thanks Boomer for the Walter Cronkite reference. I'm sure you eagerly tune in at 6:30 Eastern/5:30 Central to see what Cronkite has to say about Ukraine and Syria...