War in Ukraine

As usual, our solution will be a half million dollar weapon to take out a $500 drone before it can destroy a $9M tank. There are real lessons to be learned on this battlefield, and I wonder if we are paying attention.
Bring back our manufacturing and industrial base. Focus on STEM instead of woke/LGBTQIP+, focus on domestic energy production and mining, and engage in mutually beneficial trade with countries that have the resources we may be lacking.
 
IMO this is the most important sentence:
"With a criminal, bad faith actor like Putin, outside guarantors are even more needed."

The article proposes an outside peace keeping force. It would have to be a force that Putin will respect. Anything short of that could just give Putin time to re-arm and attack again later.

Who's going to do that if not NATO?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc and AM64
IMO this is the most important sentence:
"With a criminal, bad faith actor like Putin, outside guarantors are even more needed."

The article proposes an outside peace keeping force. It would have to be a force that Putin will respect. Anything short of that could just give Putin time to re-arm and attack again later.

Who's going to do that if not NATO?

The UN could be the peacekeeper EXCEPT Russia and China have veto power. What good is the UN if the two major belligerents have veto power and can block moves to restrain their illegal actions - like the invasion of Ukraine?
 
IMO this is the most important sentence:
"With a criminal, bad faith actor like Putin, outside guarantors are even more needed."

The article proposes an outside peace keeping force. It would have to be a force that Putin will respect. Anything short of that could just give Putin time to re-arm and attack again later.

Who's going to do that if not NATO?
Putin the bad actor? Really?



 
The UN could be the peacekeeper EXCEPT Russia and China have veto power. What good is the UN if the two major belligerents have veto power and can block moves to restrain their illegal actions - like the invasion of Ukraine?
You bellyache about China and Russia yet don't have an issue with the US and UK in Yugoslavia, Iraq and Afghanistan...
 
If that were the case, then I might agree with you in part. This is much more about building a rival organization while remaining a member of the original organization with the intent to subvert it. Russia and China learned very well what being a UN member with veto power brings them. They are largely able to act badly with impunity by vetoing any UN resolutions to counter their actions. Maybe you just don't see a parallel.
I've had a chance to think more about this today. They wouldn't have to remain in it to subvert it. You are seeing them right now simply creating a parallel set of institutions and allowing countries to decide which way they want to go. Do they want to go with BRICS+ and maintain their sovereignty without having to deal with sanctions and pollical pressure from the US?

Or do they want to be slaves to the SWIFT system/ USD, destruction of national identity and culture, sh*tty trade deals, 57 genders, open borders, coerced into whatever wars/conflicts the Pentagon prioritizes and windmills & solar panels?
 
Putin the bad actor? Really?




Remind us all why the 'Minsk Agreements' exist in the first place?
 
  • Like
Reactions: LouderVol and AM64
It has to do with Putin like governing and putting them thru a fight they can't win. What of the conscription of women being required now? If the Ukrainians were kicking ass as most of you brag about, would this be happening? None of you actually care about the people of Ukraine, much like their gov and ours, you just have blood libel for Putin. If that's your end goal, why not post that the sacrifice of all Ukrainians lives are worth it. At least that's a believable statement.
First, it could be. Russia has more than 3x the population, its pretty close to 4x the population with the land and people they took from Ukraine. So even if they were winning easily, Russia massively outnumbers them. They aren't winning easily. I keep saying it, but neither side wants to admit it, this is what war actually looks like. We have grown too accustomed to watching the US invade some fly speck nation, or watching too many movies. real war like this, is far far different, and it goes beyond a pure numbers standpoint. This is a fight for survival. Apparently Ukrainians still prefer dying on the battlefield than in a Russian concentration camp in Siberia.

Two its a bit of an unequal comparison. Russia had introduced mandatory military service, for at least a year, but could be longer if the government wants it, for every male of a certain age. This is separate from their conscription, which they have expanded to include 60 year olds, and they also just increased their age for mandatory military service. Russia has openly been relying on mercenaries and foreign troops to fill their losses.

So its not like Russia is just rolling out a bunch of volunteers, and that Ukraine is the only one having to result to "extreme recruitment" to fill up the ranks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AM64
I mean we installed the government that pushed this war. I'm sure plenty of Ukrainians are against it. They are led by a corrupt government and influenced by another (us). Meanwhile, the only ones who suffer are everyday Russians and Ukrainians forced into fighting for rich oligarchs. Time and time again.
and yet for some reason you ONLY complain about Ukraine's and our governments.

If you actually cared you would call out the Russian government too for starting the war. Only calling out the victim's government is bad form.

and no, we did not install the Ukrainian government. and even IF we had, Ukraine has had TWO elections since then. Zelensky wasn't one of the guys we "couped" into power.
 
and yet for some reason you ONLY complain about Ukraine's and our governments.

If you actually cared you would call out the Russian government too for starting the war. Only calling out the victim's government is bad form.

and no, we did not install the Ukrainian government. and even IF we had, Ukraine has had TWO elections since then. Zelensky wasn't one of the guys we "couped" into power.
What, you mean Zelensky is the legitimate, elected leader of Ukraine? Why is Russia trying to thwart the will of the Ukrainian people?
 
F5zvFSHXAAA2XBo
 

Perhaps predictably, the report makes no mention of evidence implicating Pashinsky in the 2014 massacre of 70 anti-government protesters in Kiev’s Maidan Square, an incident which pro-Western forces used to consummate their coup d’etat against then-President Viktor Yanukovych.

you mean the guy who worked hand in hand with Yukoshenko?

"During the second round of presidential elections in 2004 and the Orange Revolution, Pashynskyi worked for the candidate Victor Yushchenko in the electoral district No. 66 in Zhytomyr Oblast. The result of his work was the largest increase of votes for Yushchenko between the first and second round of elections among the regions of central and western Ukraine."
 
How will they subvert the G20 or G7 when they have no regulatory power? And again, is free trade without fear of sanctions subversion? Where are the laissez-faire capitalists in the G20?
you act like BRICS doesn't have its own rules, and requirements, and the continued possibility of this alternate currency. what do you think the whole point of that is? Its to exert their own control, ie not laisse faire, over the markets.

This isn't some purist capitalistic movement, its purely, we want the ability to do what the big guys do. which is fine, its a voluntary organization, but stop pretending like its some hold out of the free market.
 

VN Store



Back
Top