Rasputin_Vol
"Slava Ukraina"
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2007
- Messages
- 72,056
- Likes
- 39,844
Trust me, and you damn well know this also... if the US felt confident that they could pull something like that off, they would have done far earlier. All we have are threats, bluffs, sanctions and Ukrainian blood.Hopefully we don't find out. If we do, your comrades will not enjoy it all. We will establish air superiority immediately and then it is game on. After about 5-8 B-2 sorties, the road to the Crimean coast will be wide open.
It's obvious that you have no clue what our military can actually do. Your namesake Putin does know, that is why he has gone out of his way to make sure that he doesn't give NATO a reason. Like I said, air superiority would come first and the hell would be unleashed. Lots of Ladas and potatoes would be passed out.Trust me, and you damn well know this also... if the US felt confident that they could pull something like that off, they would have done far earlier. All we have are threats, bluffs, sanctions and Ukrainian blood.
Sure...It's obvious that you have no clue what our military can actually do. Your namesake Putin does know, that is why he has gone out of his way to make sure that he doesn't give NATO a reason. Like I said, air superiority would come first and the hell would be unleashed. Lots of Ladas and potatoes would be passed out.
Trust me, and you damn well know this also... if the US felt confident that they could pull something like that off, they would have done far earlier. All we have are threats, bluffs, sanctions and Ukrainian blood.
I have as much experience with that as the US military has had against a country with a real air defense system. Trying to base US success off of Iraq/ME conflicts is folly.When was the last time you were down range from an airstrike from the USAF or the USN? They can put a 500 pounder in your pocket at will. A few flights of Growlers and then a few follow up strikes by the Spirits and then it is just how much ordinance do they want to put on target.
This conflict has shown that the US and NATO combined have neither. Also, Stalin was Georgian (like Saakashvili)... not Russian.My feelings about this conflict aside, US airpower is vastly superior in terms of tactics, weapons, resource deployment and delivery. We would own the skies and in short order. Same goes for ground power. Russians will never let go of the mindset that quantity has a quality all it's own. We have the quantity to match and the quality, technology and tactics to rout them in a land war as well. The US military is likely quite confident they could pull it off if they wanted to and probably equally confident Putin would resort to a last desperate act wrt nukes as a result.
All you've done is throw out marketing pitches and ad hominems as you suffer from normalcy bias.You are so off base it isn't even funny. You are a laughingstock and have no clue why.
NATO is doing just fine and in fact hasn’t had a single combat casualty or equipment loss. Because NATO is not a combatant in this conflict. You can puff and blow all the propaganda you like saying otherwise but it’s all ********.This conflict has shown that the US and NATO combined have neither. Also, Stalin was Georgian (like Saakashvili)... not Russian.
View attachment 579312
And WTF do you call the conflict right now if it isn't a land war? How is NATO/US doing right now? The 30+ members of NATO can't out gun the gas station and North Korea?
Oh absolutely. Pointing and laughing at his Putin nut sack cradling azz is the only acceptable responseAgain, you have no clue. You and your Anti-American screed is old. I'm not going to ignore you because that is silly. But I will continue to mock your ignorance of what an actual 1st world military is capable of. Enjoy your Lada and taters Ras.
In 1991 the airspace over Baghdad was the most fortified and heavily defended airspace on the planet. We neutralized their air defenses in a single night and then proceeded to pound them into oblivion until they gave up. Who was the equipment supplier and tactics trainer for all that equipment we dismantled with ease in one dark night?I have as much experience with that as the US military has had against a country with a real air defense system. Trying to base US success off of Iraq/ME conflicts is folly.
In 1991 the airspace over Baghdad was the most fortified and heavily defended airspace on the planet. We neutralized their air defenses in a single night and then proceeded to pound them into oblivion until they gave up. Who was the equipment supplier and tactics trainer for all that equipment we dismantled with ease in one dark night?
For real? You have no clue why people make fun of you in this thread? Your screen name is taken from of one the most screwed up people to walk the face of the earth. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&sou...kQFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw03fKQ4n15omtYplgi85sI5
Well, you can split hairs on the term Russian, that’s fine. Stalin was Georgian then. The concept of quantity continued as standard practice for the Soviet/Russian military long after Stalin was dead and gone. My point is if the US lined up it’s troops, warplanes, ships, subs…it’s own people and equipment that it’s not giving to UK, we would overwhelm Russian forces decidedly. What we are currently doing is not the same by any stretch. Ukrainian forces are fighting a ground war. US forces are not.This conflict has shown that the US and NATO combined have neither. Also, Stalin was Georgian (like Saakashvili)... not Russian.
View attachment 579312
And WTF do you call the conflict right now if it isn't a land war? How is NATO/US doing right now? The 30+ members of NATO can't out gun the gas station and North Korea?
if they have the calls they need to release them. That is pretty scary stuff.
and I would be really interested to know where exactly this happened. the graphics show out in the Black Sea east and south of Ukraine, closer to Turkey than anywhere else. but that may not be accurate.