volinbham
VN GURU
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2004
- Messages
- 69,798
- Likes
- 62,530
Autocrat asks autocrat to help sustain autocracy. So we ignore Crimea? LOL.
You mean the same Crimea that has been Russian since before there was a United States? The same Crimea that was only given to The Ukraine by Khrushchev when it was the USSR? You mean the same Crimea that has the Black Sea Fleet at Sevastopol? You mean the same Crimea that had a referendum after the US lead coup in Kiev where the voted overwhelmingly to join Russia?Ohh... much like they were invited to Crimea.
That's right, the Crimea that was part of a separate sovereign state.You mean the same Crimea that has been Russian since before there was a United States? The same Crimea that was only given to The Ukraine by Khrushchev when it was the USSR? You mean the same Crimea that has the Black Sea Fleet at Sevastopol? You mean the same Crimea that had a referendum after the US lead coup in Kiev where the voted overwhelmingly to join Russia?
These two things can't both be true: Russia is getting their azz kicked in Ukraine and they are going to take over Europe.Anyone who is claiming that Ukraine is just the first step for Russia and that they are going to sweep across the EU is delusional or selling a war because they are clearly not watching facts on the ground nor thinking about Putin's own interests.
You may be a boiling frog, I'm not. for the most part women started working in the '50s & '60s because they wanted to not because they had to. Owning nice things became desirable and achievable. Women found they could buy their own jewelry, shoes and even a car if they worked a little. Then corporate America wised up and realized they could get two for the price of one and wages adjusted accordingly. My brother was born in '47 and me in '49. When we were 11 or 12 and able to take care of ourselves after school my mother decided to go to work in a department store. She wanted to, she didn't have to.It is like boiling a frog. It has been a gradual process, but our standard of living has declined. We have gone from a single income being able to comfortably raise a family to needing two (or more) incomes for most. It has gone from being able to work a summer mnimum wage job to pay a year of college (without scholarship) to needing to work 9-12 months on minimum wage to do the same today.
No, we wouldn't have. The world would have condemned us for invading a country in which we had been actively sponsoring an armed rebellion.They had Russians being killed in Donbass and NATO/US putting military assets in their border. We would have done the same thing and been justified in this particular case.
Now going into Syria, Libya, Iraq and Serbia? With no American interests and no American lives put at risk? Totally wrong. If you find an example of Russia invading a foreign country that is no strategic interest to them and no lives being put at risk since Putin has been in charge then I'll condemn it.
I'm not speaking necessarily of me personally, but the country as a whole.You may be a boiling frog, I'm not. for the most part women started working in the '50s & '60s because they wanted to not because they had to. Owning nice things became desirable and achievable. Women found they could buy their own jewelry, shoes and even a car if they worked a little. Then corporate America wised up and realized they could get two for the price of one and wages adjusted accordingly. My brother was born in '47 and me in '49. When we were 11 or 12 and able to take care of ourselves after school my mother decided to go to work in a department store. She wanted to, she didn't have to.
Ahhh... okay for Russians to go into a Western drawn state to support rebels in Ukraine, okay for Russians to go in to defend autocratic government in western drawn state in Syria. I get it, whatever Russians do is ok.And again... only part of Ukraine because of a random decision made by Khrushchev when it was part of the USSR. Crimea is more Russian than Texas is American.
Autocrat asks autocrat to help sustain autocracy. So we ignore Crimea? LOL.
So they allow 20k people to evacuate and they use 500 as human shields?The HORROR of Mariupol: Putin Troops Hold 500 Hostages in a Hospital as Human Shields while Premature Babies Are Abandoned By Their Parents – but at least 20,000 civilians have been allowed to flee the besieged city
Vladimir Putin's troops have seized a hospital in Mariupol and are holding 500 Ukrainians hostage, using them as human shields as attacks on the southern city continue.
- Some Ukrainians travelled via a 'humanitarian corridor' set up by Russian military to Rostov region in Russia
Russian forces rounded up 400 people from houses neighbouring the seaport's hospital number two, along with 100 doctors and patients who were already inside, and are refusing to let them leave, according to regional governor Pavlo Kyrylenko.
The terror came against a backdrop of frantic evacuation elsewhere in Mariupol, with around 20,000 fleeing the besieged city along a humanitarian corridor - supposedly safe passages which allow civilians to leave Ukraine.
Amid days of relentless shelling, a mass exodus of civilians in at least 4,000 cars left the seaport via the designated route, which runs west for more than 160 miles to the Ukraine-held city of Zaporizhzhia.
But while families rushed to escape in their droves, there were desperate scenes in Mariupol's hospitals, which continue to be under attack from Putin's forces.
In the city's hospital number three, a heartbreaking picture showed tiny premature children who had been left without parents.
![]()
In the city's hospital number three, a heartbreaking picture showed tiny premature children who had been left without parents
![]()
Alexandra, 86, cries after her apartment was destroyed by a Russian grad rocket attack in Kharkiv, Ukraine on Tuesday
20,000 evacuees flee hell of Mariupol in humanitarian corridors but many end up in RUSSIA | Daily Mail Online
The Syrian autocrat restrains some very nasty elements in that country and does a better job than most in the region of protecting the Christian community. A freer, fairer Syria would no doubt be desirable, but we all saw what happened when we overthrew the Ba'athist to the east.
World condemnation did not stop us from doing that exact thing in Syria and Libya. The Muslim Brotherood moved weapons from Egypt to Libya, overthrew Khaddaffi, then we shipped/smuggled those weapons to Turkey where they were given to the Free Syrian Army and ISIS.No, we wouldn't have. The world would have condemned us for invading a country in which we had been actively sponsoring an armed rebellion.
We had tried that about a year before with the Bay of Pigs. Plus, the only reason why the Soviets put missiles in Cuba was in response to the US placing missiles in Turkey.When Russia weaponized Cuba we didn't go in and and invade Havana and other cities and bomb them into the stone age.
I'm not a believer in the philosophy that some people deserve to live under the thumb of an autocratic while others don't.
I believe in the ability of a governed people to choose their government.It's not a question of deserts; it's a question of what's possible. What succeeded Saddam was not a democratic republic with a bill of rights, but ISIS and the utter destruction of Iraq's ancient Christian community. I have no desire to live in Assad's Syria, but I'd much rather live in Assad's Syria than Abu Sakkar's.
You are emotional right now because you don't like seeing your country be the bad guy that stirs up a lot of these problems.Ahhh... okay for Russians to go into a Western drawn state to support rebels in Ukraine, okay for Russians to go in to defend autocratic government in western drawn state in Syria. I get it, whatever Russians do is ok.