WoodsmanVol
It takes wisdom to understand wisdom.
- Joined
- May 12, 2010
- Messages
- 17,590
- Likes
- 13,533
Respect and appreciation for taking the time explaining that so thoroughly. I learned a lot.
Well done.
I am actually. See my longer post above. I actually do research into topics. I'm actually quite the expert on the Latter Day Saint (not the LDS church) movement and other religious movements.... Because your so open to differing points of view.
I always learn a lot from Fisher...Very educated man. Knows his details so through it is like being back in School. Wonder if he is a History Professor.
I'm just pointing out facts. When I first started posting on the political forum regularly it was people like you and the usual "moderate" crowd telling me I must call out both sides. However, you "moderates" actually fail miserably at seeing both sides yourselves. It's really about getting people to only see your side. I'm smart enough to see right through that BS and call it out. Which really irritates your crowd.
The reality is there is actually two sides to this issue and some of us are pointing out. I've called out Putin, Russia, Ukraine, U.S., NATO , John McCain, Victoria Nuland, etc. There has been more than one guilty party in all of this.
I agree with some of what Fisher said. A lot of this hatred stems from the Holodomor during the Soviet Union era. Keep in mind it was the Soviet Union who did that and not Russia. This led to many Ukrainians siding with Nazi Germany and led to the rise of Stepan Bandera. Bandera still has many followers today. It fits under the category of ultranationalism. I could give more of a history lesson on the subject but will pass for now. I'll just be wasting my time.
Putin has strategically taken over Crimea and is trying to block off Ukraine from the Black Sea. He has supported Transnistria's independence. As well as that of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Sadly, most people have absolutely no idea about those 3 independence movements which of course have been supported by Russia. More than likely for strategic and economic reasons.
Kinda looks like my WinnDixie. Thanks JoeDon't panic over food supply, says Russian government
View attachment 441447
Empty shelves in a Moscow store last weekImage caption: Empty shelves in a Moscow store last week
The Russian government insists there is no need to panic over the availability of basic foods.
"We are fully covering our needs in sugar and buckwheat," said deputy PM Viktoria Abramchenko.
"There is no need to panic, no need to stockpile those goods. There's enough for everyone," she said at a government meeting, reported by Interfax news agency.
She did say however that Russia would increase the area of land used to sow sugar beet and buckwheat this year.
Abramchenko also said that so far the sanctions imposed on Russia did not give grounds to expect any food shortages. She said Russia was expanding imports from "friendly countries" to guarantee stocks of dairy produce, fruit and veg, meat and animal feed. She mentioned ex-Soviet neighbours in that group as well as Turkey, India and China.
The sanctions have depressed the value of the rouble, making imported food more expensive. They have also made it harder for Russia to use international financial services.
Poland is not taking any chances
There are more than a few ways for things to slip out of control. Hopefully Putin is either shown the door or persuaded to enter a ceasefire to claim some irrelevant victory.
Can you imagine if Russia had free elections and joined western values? They'd be off the charts rich and with no fears.
None of your long winded post actually justifies or explains anything.I'm just pointing out facts. When I first started posting on the political forum regularly it was people like you and the usual "moderate" crowd telling me I must call out both sides. However, you "moderates" actually fail miserably at seeing both sides yourselves. It's really about getting people to only see your side. I'm smart enough to see right through that BS and call it out. Which really irritates your crowd.
The reality is there is actually two sides to this issue and some of us are pointing out. I've called out Putin, Russia, Ukraine, U.S., NATO , John McCain, Victoria Nuland, etc. There has been more than one guilty party in all of this.
I agree with some of what Fisher said. A lot of this hatred stems from the Holodomor during the Soviet Union era. Keep in mind it was the Soviet Union who did that and not Russia. This led to many Ukrainians siding with Nazi Germany and led to the rise of Stepan Bandera. Bandera still has many followers today. It fits under the category of ultranationalism. I could give more of a history lesson on the subject but will pass for now. I'll just be wasting my time.
Putin has strategically taken over Crimea and is trying to block off Ukraine from the Black Sea. He has supported Transnistria's independence. As well as that of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Sadly, most people have absolutely no idea about those 3 independence movements which of course have been supported by Russia. More than likely for strategic and economic reasons.
That’s what we said when Yeltsin took over. The corruption in that land is too deep seated and baked in for that to ever happen. They have no historical precedent on which to base such a cultureThere are more than a few ways for things to slip out of control. Hopefully Putin is either shown the door or persuaded to enter a ceasefire to claim some irrelevant victory.
Can you imagine if Russia had free elections and joined western values? They'd be off the charts rich and with no fears.
None of your ranting about whether somebody claims to be moderate or "both sides" or you think they claim to be moderate or "both sides" is relevant to anything other than the fact that you use it as a go to ad hominem when they don't agree with you.I am actually. See my longer post above. I actually do research into topics. I'm actually quite the expert on the Latter Day Saint (not the LDS church) movement and other religious movements.
Let me ask you 2 questions. It's off topic but will be fun. Who was a better WR? Wesley Walker or Andre Johnson? Mike Quick or Sterling Sharpe? If don't follow the NFL then don't worry.
Perhaps we can agree that the beliefs of Stepan Bandera are outdated just like the ideas of Hitler and Marx should be considered outdated?
Or maybe we can't agree because you thinking seems to be one sided on the issue.