War in Ukraine

So when people don't agree with everything you say or you can't win a simple debate you resort to false accusations and smears. Typical juvenile, democrat behavior.

You defended white nationalism and ultranationalism in Ukraine. And your boy Richard Spencer is right there with you. How does that feel?

Well, no, don't be a goof who doesn't understand you being an example of irony.

I've defended nationalism as a vital ingredient in a stable society and stated it can be left/right, good or bad depending upon whose nationalism we're talking about and the circumstance. I've plainly stated Azov are not Nazis as your cadre claims; that's fact. It is not defense of "white nationalism"; do you not understand the distinction?

I'm making fun of you guys pointing and yelling Nazi! at the drop of the hat, by doing it to you with your own self-serving dot connecting.
 
@luthervol is a continuum of nonsense.
I do actually think Luther is smart and I have some respect for him so I leave him alone usually. Plus, like me, he seems to be in a 1 on 7 handicap match a lot of the time. I don't want to jump in and make it 1 on 8.

Someone did say he was turning into John Bolton recently though lol.
 
I do actually think Luther is smart and I have some respect for him so I leave him alone usually. Plus, like me, he seems to be in a 1 on 7 handicap match a lot of the time. I don't want to jump in and make it 1 on 8.

Someone did say he was turning into John Bolton recently though lol.

Morphing into John Bolton would be improvement.
 
@NCFisher LOL, you're a filthy dem now?

I knew someone would see through my Trump apologia eventually; well, fun while it lasted!

Law, Luth, EV, Monty - just wanted to say I'm a closet admirer!!

And RasDonGr still have a lot in common with Putin-worshipping white ultranationalists...
 
Last edited:
Well, no, don't be a goof who doesn't understand you being an example of irony.

I've defended nationalism as a vital ingredient in a stable society and stated it can be left/right, good or bad depending upon whose nationalism we're talking about and the circumstance. I've plainly stated Azov are not Nazis as your cadre claims; that's fact. It is not defense of "white nationalism"; do you not understand the distinction?

I'm making fun of you guys pointing and yelling Nazi! at the drop of the hat, by doing it to you with your own self-serving dot connecting.
I was not yelling it at the drop of a hat. The ultranationalist and neo Nazi sentiment of some in Ukraine is well documented. I'm also aware of the ultranationalist groups in Russia. But I haven't seen them attacking groups of people like the Ossetians or even Ukrainians who live in Russia. Like some Ukrainians have done with Russians since 2014. I still don't agree with ultranationalism as that tends to lead to racism and hatred towards other groups of people.

Now I have called out on more than one occasion of the Russian government targeting Jehovah Witnesses and claiming they are an extremist group. Calling them an extremist group is nonsense. But JWs are against nationalism, serving in the military, and many of their religious views conflict with the Russian Orthodox Church. I seem to be the only one in here bringing attention to that matter.
 
Edit : I forgot Canadians but even if they did say something off putting , they would apologize in 5 mins so they don’t count .

"Tim Horton's doughnuts are the best!"
"But to be fair, we have NOT TRIED the dung-fired toasted bread of Borneo tribes."
 
Last edited:
Well, no, don't be a goof who doesn't understand you being an example of irony.

I've defended nationalism as a vital ingredient in a stable society and stated it can be left/right, good or bad depending upon whose nationalism we're talking about and the circumstance. I've plainly stated Azov are not Nazis as your cadre claims; that's fact. It is not defense of "white nationalism"; do you not understand the distinction?

I'm making fun of you guys pointing and yelling Nazi! at the drop of the hat, by doing it to you with your own self-serving dot connecting.
You are going have to channel your inner Kamala Harris if you want your target audience to understand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NCFisher
Last edited:
I'd be shocked if there weren't a few NATO snake eaters not embedded with the Ukrainian SF.

It's not even fair, pooty sending these poor kids in rusty tin cans into a land they don't want to be in, fighting an enemy that they don't hate just to get walloped by an nlaw while they desperately try to stay warm.

Whattadick.
I've thought the same thing
 
Only one side invaded the other under false pretenses, how Ukraine chooses to fight is irrelevant if there is no invasion. Furthermore, if your country was being systematically destroyed you would use whatever means necessary. Anyone who says otherwise is lying to themselves

You are so pathetic and transparent. Russia didn't invade under false pretenses. Also, "whatever means necessary" is your justification for basically excusing any Ukrainian atrocity while holding Russia to the strictest of standards.
 
You are so pathetic and transparent. Russia didn't invade under false pretenses. Also, "whatever means necessary" is your justification for basically excusing any Ukrainian atrocity while holding Russia to the strictest of standards.

Please enlighten us voljar. Why did Russia invade Ukraine?
 

VN Store



Back
Top