I think one aspect often missed is that the German Nazis were not simply antisemitic, but Aryan with a hierarchy of races (even within "white" ones) with the Teutonic Germany at the apogee. In the same way, it seems to me that the term "Nazi" being used for Ukraine groups are Aryan nationalists who hate "white" Poles and Russians mostly. Jews and the rest are of less concern really. So its some sort of Aryanism mixed in cultural nationalism.
People like simple labels though, especially when they can tar their enemies with disparaging ones.
Good point. I promise this is going somewhere:
I've noted a number of times is that nationalism is primary ingredient for keeping a society stable and preventing balkanization. And highlight the logical contradiction of the left gushing over "Top 10 Best Nations to Live" lists; they're all predominantly white Euro or descendant countries. Some remained that way due to geography, others with geography and 'whites only' immigration policy that lasted into the mid-20th century. Aside from imported slave and indentured labor from Africa and China, Asia early on, we had dense migrations of white Europeans who, despite their language and unique cultural attributes, had fundamental similarities (primarily Christian or Catholic religion) that was a binding agent. And they coalesced under a promise of being citizen in a constitutional republic based upon individual rights that a democratic mob can't vote away from the individual. Immigrants, contrary to narrative, didn't make this country; that Constitution did.
I want the U.S. to work. I want the (gag!) 'multicultural' experiment to somehow pull through. But according to the left we're not just racist, but based upon a white supremacist constitution and society is hardly better than when the ports of NY, MA, RI were the epicenter of the British colonial Atlantic slave trade. I'm bearish on the multicultural utopia; if it doesn't work here, it isn't going to work anywhere.
That observation has provoked more tiresome 'racist!' and 'bigot!' accusations than I care to remember. Perhaps multicultural vacationing and trade are best, rather than trying to shoehorn populaces together and diluting the society to accommodate cultural allegiances.
Which is a long-winded way of saying even ultranationalists are not wrong to have a deep skepticism or conviction that ethnic homogeneity is unnecessary for establishing a country or keeping it. Conquering nations have always understood this and attempted to mitigate or erase ethnic culture to assimilate the conquered. It's ugly, but practical and I understand it. That's not saying groups like Azov are good guys because they're not Nazis, and may have aspects of similar Aryan-based belief. But they were created to shore up a deficient Ukrainian army in the Donbas region against Russian annexation of another chunk of the country. I wouldn't have to subscribe to whatever ultranationalists believe except a shared nationalism, to appreciate their killing invaders of our mutual home were it here.