Web Censorship and Political Bias

#553
#553
Purple Tiger said:
Are you naive enough to think Facebook based their policy totally on what the WHO said?
Click to expand...

They are removing content that does not comply with WHO recommendations. Are you native enough to think that's a good idea considering they've told us that there is no human to human transmission and that masks don't work?
 
#555
#555
azVolFan said:
They are removing content that does not comply with WHO recommendations. Are you native enough to think that's a good idea considering they've told us that there is no human to human transmission and that masks don't work?
Click to expand...
Are you silly enough to think the whole world gets it's news and medical advice from Facebook? Try the Mayo Clinic site or some news outlets - they are highly informative.
 
#556
#556
Purple Tiger said:
So? It is Facebook's right to do what they want. Same thing happens with any other kind of media. Quit being a baby.
Click to expand...
Purple Tiger said:
Yes. Not every platform or conversation is an outlet for you to air your personal beliefs. I am not sure where you got the idea that a social media corporation has to post everything you want.
Click to expand...

Medical companies and procedures is now personal beliefs??
 
#568
#568
Byron York's Daily Memo: Devin Nunes vindicated - again
DEVIN NUNES VINDICATED -- AGAIN. Think back to March 2017. Republican Rep. Devin Nunes, then chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, announced he had learned about the "unmasking" of Trump transition officials by the outgoing Obama administration. Most people didn't even know what unmasking was; it referred to the disclosure of names of Americans whose communications were incidentally picked up in U.S. intelligence surveillance. In this case, one American unmasked was Gen. Michael Flynn, the incoming Trump national security adviser, whose conversations with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak were intercepted by U.S. spies. The unmasking led to enormous grief for Gen. Flynn and the country.

Nunes' announcement was quickly dismissed as a "stunt," a "charade," and a "fiasco." "The unmasking stunt was completely fabricated," said former Obama Justice Department official Matthew Miller. "Devin Nunes is dangerous," pronounced the New York Times' Frank Bruni. "Nunes' Fake Scandal" declared the New Yorker. Similar sentiments echoed across the hallowed halls of the Washington Post, the Times, CNN, and MSNBC.
...
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
Reactions: CagleMtnVol
#570
#570
WSJ: DOJ, State Attorneys General Likely to Hit Google with Antitrust Lawsuits

According to a report from the Wall Street Journal, officials at the Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general are focused on Google’s ad business and how it has used its search monopoly. According to the WSJ, the DOJ is planning to bring a case as early as this summer, while state AGs are likely to file a case in the fall.

The Wall Street Journal reports that both the Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general are likely to file an antitrust lawsuits against Google and have already begun to plan litigation according to sources with knowledge of the matter.

WSJ: DOJ, State Attorneys General Likely to Hit Google with Antitrust Lawsuits
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigOrangeD
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top