Parler was started a little over a year ago and is picking up steam with all the updates.I think that the "deals and tax breaks" should be taken away, but the solution to this situation is not through executive orders and more government regulation. It's through competition. So why don't Republicans/conservatives/Trump supporters create their own micro-blogging and social networking service, which they could use to both censor Democrats and exclude Democrats from, while posting politically partisan opinions and debunked conspiracy theories? Because they don't know how to do it. Collectively speaking, Republicans/conservatives/Trump supporters are not as creative as liberals when it comes to cyber-technology. However, that is not the fault of liberals, now is it?
It's section 230. The same law I have been mentioning for a year in here and all day yesterday to BB.Trump is set to announce an executive order against social media companies - CNNPolitics
Well - here it goes. This is despicable.
I expect the freedom loving right wing partisans will come out any moment against this. Let's see who has principles.
1) Trump is not a conservative republicanTime to take it to the Supreme Court. The Democrats,Big Tech and the MSM want to make sure the Conservative Republicans have no voice online,on social media and 1st amendment rights at all!
Appeals court ruling suggests little legal traction for Trump's anti-Twitter campaign
If Republicans want a larger online presence, they could try actually producing the micro-blogging and social networking services themselves. In terms of cyber-technology, it's the Silicon Valley liberals who create. Conservatives don't do $hit.Time to take it to the Supreme Court. The Democrats,Big Tech and the MSM want to make sure the Conservative Republicans have no voice online,on social media and 1st amendment rights at all!
Appeals court ruling suggests little legal traction for Trump's anti-Twitter campaign
Then refute my posts. It's not about fighting it's about calling out the many ridiculous claims you makeYou prove every day that you're a clueless libtard trying to pick fights with conservatives on Volnation with your idiotic posts.
You're the worst message board moderator anywhere and you know where you can go asshat.Then refute my posts. It's not about fighting it's about calling out the many ridiculous claims you make
@McDad you now get a free avatar with your yearly membership fee
If Republicans want a larger online presence, they could try actually producing the micro-blogging and social networking services themselves. In terms of cyber-technology, it's the Silicon Valley liberals who create. Conservatives don't do $hit.
And for about the tenth time... this has nothing to do with the damn 1st Amendment. The right to free speech only protects against government censorship. Twitter and Facebook are not the government.
That's because GT grads are wimpsOther message boards that I post on do like the Georgia Tech Swarm Message Board. If you don't like me ban me because i'm going to keep posting like I post now..
There is no bias from me. I believe the business should be able to operate as they see fit without interference from the govt. You believe business should be regulated by the big, benevolent govt based on "fairness"Your bias is dripping. Do both or none at all.
Okay. So, eliminate those deals and shut the hell up. If conservatives want a platform where they can post whatever they want without being fact-checked, then the onus should be on conservatives to produce it. The real problem that conservatives have on social media, is that you don't seem capable of the same creativity as Silicon Valley liberals.You keep repeating this. They aren’t the government but are profiting massively off their deals with the government.
You say this while China, Iran, Soros etc. gives billions to Silicon valley. Like I said yesterday, if you aren't a democrat when you build some software you will be a year later."It's so unfair that liberals are better at this computer stuff than we are. I need an executive order. Where's my Sharpie?" - Donald Trump
No it's based on section 230. Yank all their deals and make them start paying taxes and they can do whatever they want.There is no bias from me. I believe the business should be able to operate as they see fit without interference from the govt. You believe business should be regulated by the big, benevolent govt based on "fairness"
Which one is the more conservative view?